Abnormal Security Messages
SkillCommunicationAbnormal Security message analysis: message retrieval, email header inspection, attachments, sender reputation, delivery context, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC authentication results.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Abnormal Security Messages skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins in msp-claude-plugins/abnormal/abnormal-security/skills/messages/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Overview
Abnormal Security provides deep message analysis capabilities beyond basic threat detection. This skill covers message retrieval, header inspection, attachment analysis, sender authentication results, and delivery context. Use it when performing forensic analysis of specific emails or investigating delivery patterns.
Anti-triggers
- Where a message went, or why it never arrived — Abnormal sees
messages only as evidence attached to a detected threat. It has no
delivery pipeline, no queue, and no bounce record, so "trace this
email" questions belong to the gateway: use
Mimecast Message Tracking. - Removing the message from inboxes, or putting it back — that is
the remediation surface; use
Abnormal Security Threats. - Inspecting a message a gateway is holding — everything Abnormal
can show was already delivered. Pre-delivery holds are
SpamTitan QuarantineorProofpoint Quarantine.
Message Field Reference
These are response fields describing what Abnormal reports about a
message. They are not tool parameters — the only parameters the message
tools accept are threatId and messageId. Availability varies by
message and by tenant configuration; treat any single field as
best-effort.
Core Message Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
abxMessageId | string | Abnormal's identifier for the message, as returned in the abnormal_messages_list response |
subject | string | Email subject line |
fromAddress | string | From header email address |
fromName | string | From header display name |
toAddresses | string[] | All To: recipients |
ccAddresses | string[] | All CC: recipients |
bccAddresses | string[] | All BCC: recipients (if available) |
sentTime | datetime | When the email was sent |
receivedTime | datetime | When the email was received by Abnormal |
internetMessageId | string | RFC 5322 Message-ID header |
Sender Analysis Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
senderAddress | string | Envelope sender address |
senderName | string | Sender display name |
senderDomain | string | Sender domain |
senderIpAddress | string | Originating IP address |
returnPath | string | Return-Path header (envelope sender) |
replyToEmails | string[] | Reply-To header addresses |
Authentication Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
spfResult | string | SPF check result: pass, fail, softfail, neutral, none |
dkimResult | string | DKIM signature result: pass, fail, none |
dmarcResult | string | DMARC policy result: pass, fail, none |
authenticationResults | string | Full Authentication-Results header |
Attachment Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
attachmentCount | int | Number of attachments |
attachmentNames | string[] | Filenames of attachments |
attachmentTypes | string[] | MIME types of attachments |
attachmentSizes | int[] | Sizes of attachments in bytes |
URL Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
urls | string[] | All URLs found in message body |
urlCount | int | Total number of URLs |
Delivery Context
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
isRead | boolean | Whether the recipient has read the email |
isInternal | boolean | Whether the email is internal (within org) |
isExternal | boolean | Whether the email is from outside the org |
remediationStatus | string | Current remediation status |
MCP Tools
Two tools, and both are scoped to a single threat. There is no separate
headers tool and no tenant-wide message search — you cannot ask "show me
every message from this sender". Every message lookup starts from a
threatId.
| Tool | Description | Parameters |
|---|---|---|
abnormal_messages_list | List the messages inside one threat case. Returns message IDs and summary data. | threatId (required) |
abnormal_messages_get | Full analysis of one message: metadata, headers, URLs, attachments, and AI threat analysis — all in a single payload. | threatId (required), messageId (required) |
Headers arrive inline, not from a separate call
abnormal_messages_get returns the header set as part of its one
response, alongside URLs, attachments and the AI analysis. Everything the
Header Analysis Workflow below asks for comes out of that single call —
there is no second, header-only fetch to make, and nothing to page
through. The practical consequence is on the other side: one
abnormal_messages_get pulls the entire substance of a customer's email
into context, including recipient addresses and Authentication-Results,
whether or not you needed the headers. Call it when you intend to do
forensics on that message, not to browse.
ID vocabulary
threatId is a UUID string. messageId is the message identifier
from the abnormal_messages_list response (URL-encoded when sent). Do
not confuse either with caseId, which abnormal_cases_get takes as a
number.
Tool Usage Examples
List messages associated with a threat:
{
"tool": "abnormal_messages_list",
"parameters": {
"threatId": "184def76-3c28-4e1b-9ef0-a5abc123def4"
}
}
Get one message in full (metadata, headers, URLs, attachments):
{
"tool": "abnormal_messages_get",
"parameters": {
"threatId": "184def76-3c28-4e1b-9ef0-a5abc123def4",
"messageId": "<CA+8mv1x@mail.example.com>"
}
}
Message Analysis Workflows
Header Analysis Workflow
- Retrieve the message -
abnormal_messages_getreturns the headers inline; there is no separate header call - Check authentication:
- SPF: Does the sending IP match the domain's SPF record?
- DKIM: Is the DKIM signature valid and aligned?
- DMARC: Does the message pass DMARC policy?
- Trace routing:
- Follow Received headers from bottom to top
- Identify mail servers and relay hops
- Check for unusual routing or delays
- Inspect key headers:
- From vs Return-Path mismatch (potential spoofing)
- Reply-To vs From mismatch (redirect replies)
- X-Mailer or User-Agent (sending client)
- Content-Type and encoding
Attachment Analysis Workflow
- List attachments - Review filenames, types, and sizes
- Check for suspicious patterns:
- Double extensions (e.g.,
invoice.pdf.exe) - Macro-enabled Office files (
.docm,.xlsm) - Archive files (
.zip,.rar,.7z) containing executables - Unusual MIME types
- Double extensions (e.g.,
- Cross-reference with threat data:
- Check if the attachment hash matches known malware
- Review sandbox analysis results if available
- Assess risk:
- Was the attachment opened by the recipient?
- How many users received the same attachment?
Sender Reputation Workflow
- Check sender identity:
- Is this a first-time sender to this recipient?
- Does the display name match the email address?
- Is the domain recently registered?
- Verify authentication:
- SPF, DKIM, DMARC all passing?
- Are there any authentication failures?
- Check sender IP:
- Is the IP on any blocklists?
- Does it match the expected mail server for the domain?
- Review communication history:
- Has this sender contacted the organization before?
- Is the communication pattern normal?
Authentication Results Reference
SPF Results
| Result | Meaning | Risk |
|---|---|---|
pass | Sending IP authorized by domain | Low |
softfail | IP not authorized but not explicitly denied | Medium |
fail | IP explicitly not authorized | High |
neutral | No SPF assertion | Medium |
none | No SPF record exists | Medium |
DKIM Results
| Result | Meaning | Risk |
|---|---|---|
pass | Valid DKIM signature, aligned | Low |
fail | DKIM signature invalid | High |
none | No DKIM signature present | Medium |
DMARC Results
| Result | Meaning | Risk |
|---|---|---|
pass | Passes DMARC policy (SPF or DKIM aligned) | Low |
fail | Fails DMARC policy | High |
none | No DMARC record exists | Medium |
Error Handling
Common API Errors
| Code | Message | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| 400 | Invalid message ID | Use a messageId taken from abnormal_messages_list, not a hand-built one |
| 401 | Unauthorized | Check API token |
| 404 | Message not found | Message may have been purged or threat ID is wrong |
| 429 | Rate limited | Wait and retry |
Best Practices
- Always check authentication - SPF/DKIM/DMARC failures are strong spoofing indicators
- Compare From and Return-Path - Mismatches often indicate spoofing or forwarding
- Review Reply-To - Reply-To different from From is a common BEC indicator
- Check attachment types carefully - Not all dangerous files have obvious extensions
- Trace Received headers - Follow the email routing path for anomalies
- Check if email was read - Read emails with credential phishing need password resets
- Cross-reference with threats - Message context enriches threat investigations
Related Skills
- Abnormal Threats - Threat detection and analysis
- Abnormal Cases - Abuse mailbox case management
- Abnormal API Patterns - API authentication and usage
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 45
- Forks
- 24
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
abnormal-security-messages- Source
- github.com/wyre-ai/msp-claude-plugins