active-inference-robotics
SkillAI & modelsBridge active inference theory with robot control using K-Scale's JAX/MuJoCo stack. Use when connecting predictive coding to locomotion policies, mapping KL divergence minimization to RL training, applying mean field approximation to robotics state estimation, or implementing sim2real as inference about future observations.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the active-inference-robotics skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by plurigrid/asi in skills/active-inference-robotics/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Synthesizes Patrick Kenny's discrete active inference framework with K-Scale's JAX/MuJoCo robotics stack for predictive coding in robot locomotion.
Use When
- Bridging active inference theory with robot control implementations
- Connecting KL divergence minimization to RL training loops
- Applying mean field approximation to robotics state estimation
- Implementing sim2real transfer as inference about future observations
- Training locomotion policies with principled entropy regularization
The Constructive Collision
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CONSTRUCTIVE COLLISION: Two Threads Converging │
│ │
│ Thread A: Patrick Kenny (Nov 2025) │
│ ════════════════════════════════════ │
│ "Active inference can be formulated as constrained KL divergence │
│ minimization solved by standard mean field methods" │
│ │
│ Key insight: Expected Free Energy ≈ KL Divergence + Entropy Regularizer │
│ │
│ Thread B: K-Scale Labs (2024-2025) │
│ ═══════════════════════════════════ │
│ "RL-based closed-loop control using policies trained in simulation │
│ has firmly won as the best way of achieving real-time control" │
│ │
│ Key insight: Stateless vs Stateful behaviors as pure/coalgebraic semantics │
│ │
│ COLLISION POINT: Both minimize surprise about future observations │
│ ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ │
│ │
│ Active Inference Robotics RL │
│ ──────────────── ────────── │
│ Predictive Distribution ←→ Policy π(a|s) │
│ Hidden Markov Model ←→ MDP/POMDP │
│ Mean Field Updates ←→ PPO Gradient Steps │
│ Variational Free Energy ←→ Policy Loss │
│ Expected Free Energy ←→ Value Function + Entropy │
│ Perception/Action Loop ←→ Observation/Action Loop │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Kenny's Key Contribution
From arXiv:2511.20321:
Perception/Action Divergence = VFE(past) + KL(future states)
Where:
- VFE(past) = Standard variational free energy on observed history
- KL(future) = Divergence of predictive distribution from HMM
This differs from Expected Free Energy by an ENTROPY REGULARIZER:
EFE ≈ Pragmatic Value + Mutual Information
PAD ≈ Pragmatic Value + Entropy(Q)
Why Entropy Regularization Matters for Robotics
# In ksim PPO training, entropy bonus prevents policy collapse:
loss = policy_loss + value_loss - entropy_coef * entropy
# Kenny's formulation shows this is NOT ad-hoc but principled:
# Entropy regularizer = not being overconfident about predictions
# Biological rationale: know limitations of future predictions
Mapping to ksim Architecture
| Active Inference Concept | ksim Implementation |
|---|---|
| Hidden Markov Model | PhysicsEngine (MJX/MuJoCo) |
| Observation distribution | Observation.observe(state) |
| State inference Q(s) | Critic.forward(obs, carry) |
| Action inference Q(a) | Actor.forward(obs, carry) |
| Mean field factorization | Independent Q(s_t) per timestep |
| Predictive distribution | Policy rollout trajectory |
| VFE minimization | PPO policy gradient |
| EFE/PAD minimization | Value function + entropy bonus |
Second-Order Behavior Types
1. Reflexive Control (Kenny's "Sufficient" Model)
# Agent predicts proprioceptive sensations → fulfills reflexively
class ReflexiveController:
"""
Kenny: "If the agent can successfully predict its future sensations,
it can fulfill them unconsciously via motor reflexes."
"""
def step(self, predicted_proprio: Array) -> Action:
# Low-level PD control fulfills proprioceptive predictions
return self.pd_controller(predicted_proprio, self.current_state)
2. Deliberative Planning (EFE Extension)
# When reflexive prediction fails, engage deliberative inference
class DeliberativeController:
"""
Extends reflexive control with policy search over trajectories.
This is where EFE differs from Kenny's PAD formulation.
"""
def plan(self, beliefs: Distribution, horizon: int) -> Policy:
# Tree search over policies weighted by expected free energy
for policy in self.policy_space:
efe = self.expected_free_energy(beliefs, policy, horizon)
# EFE includes mutual information (curiosity/exploration)
# PAD would use entropy instead (uncertainty awareness)
3. Hierarchical Composition
Level 3: Goal Selection (minimize long-horizon EFE)
↓ sets reference for
Level 2: Trajectory Planning (predictive distribution)
↓ sets reference for
Level 1: Reflexive Execution (fulfill proprio predictions)
↓ actuates
Level 0: Motor Primitives (PD control, actuator dynamics)
GF(3) Balanced Quad
active-inference (0) ⊗ kscale-ksim (0) ⊗ mujoco-playground (0) = 0 ✓
All three are ERGODIC — coordination/infrastructure skills.
This is a "resonant triad" where all components coordinate.
For generation (+1), add: skill-creator, algorithmic-art
For verification (-1), add: sheaf-cohomology, code-review
Skill Colors (drand seed 12005093902789493003)
| Skill | Trit | Color | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
active-inference | 0 | #DF8D0F | Coordination (theory) |
kscale-ksim | 0 | #25BC3D | Coordination (simulation) |
mujoco-playground | 0 | #93DBDA | Coordination (framework) |
2-3-5-7 Prime Sieve Experts
Applying prime-indexed refinement to identify domain experts:
| Prime | Expert | Domain | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Patrick Kenny | Active Inference | Mean field formulation, PAD criterion |
| 3 | Thomas Parr | Active Inference | 2022 textbook, EFE derivation |
| 5 | Ben Bolte | K-Scale | ksim architecture, open-source humanoids |
| 7 | Karl Friston | Free Energy Principle | FEP foundations, continuous formulation |
| 11 | (DeepMind team) | MuJoCo Playground | MJX, sim2real zero-shot |
| 13 | Wesley Maa | K-Scale | Tooling, visualization |
Mutual Awareness
This skill references and is referenced by:
depends_on:
- kscale-ksim # Simulation implementation
- kscale-ecosystem # Hardware context
- mujoco-playground # Framework foundation
referenced_by:
- cognitive-superposition # Team mental models
- parametrised-optics-cybernetics # Category theory bridge
- reafference-corollary-discharge # Sensorimotor prediction
Implementation Pattern
# Unified Active Inference + RL Training Loop
class ActiveInferenceTrainer:
"""
Combines Kenny's PAD criterion with ksim's PPO.
"""
def __init__(self, hmm: PhysicsEngine, config: Config):
self.hmm = hmm
self.actor = Actor(config)
self.critic = Critic(config)
def perception_action_divergence(
self,
observations: Array, # O_{1:t} (past)
q_future: Distribution # Q(S_{t+1:T}, O_{t+1:T})
) -> Scalar:
"""
Kenny's PAD = VFE(past) + KL(future states from HMM)
"""
# Past: standard VFE on observation history
vfe_past = self.variational_free_energy(observations)
# Future: KL divergence of predicted states from HMM
# Note: Observable emissions cancel out in future KL
kl_future = self.kl_future_states(q_future, self.hmm)
return vfe_past + kl_future
def train_step(self, trajectory: Trajectory) -> Metrics:
# PPO updates approximate mean field coordinate ascent
# Entropy bonus provides Kenny's regularization
return ppo_update(
self.actor,
self.critic,
trajectory,
entropy_coef=0.01 # ← The regularizer!
)
References
- Kenny (2025) Active Inference from First Principles
- Parr, Pezzulo, Friston (2022) Active Inference Textbook
- ActInf ModelStream 019.1 - Jan 15, 2026
- K-Scale Labs GitHub
- MuJoCo Playground
- Ben Bolte's Blog
ACSet Schema
@present SchActiveInferenceRobotics(FreeSchema) begin
# Objects
HMM::Ob # Hidden Markov Model (generative model)
State::Ob # Latent state
Observation::Ob # Sensory observation
Action::Ob # Motor command
Policy::Ob # Action sequence
# Morphisms (inference)
perceive::Hom(Observation, State) # Perception: O → S
predict::Hom(State, Observation) # Prediction: S → O
act::Hom(State, Action) # Action selection: S → A
transition::Hom(State × Action, State) # Dynamics: S × A → S'
# Attributes
FreeEnergy::AttrType
vfe::Attr(State, FreeEnergy) # Variational free energy
efe::Attr(Policy, FreeEnergy) # Expected free energy
pad::Attr(Policy, FreeEnergy) # Perception/action divergence
# The key relationship (Kenny's contribution):
# pad ≈ efe + entropy_regularizer
end
Related Skills
kscale-ksim— simulation implementation partnermujoco-playground— framework foundationcognitive-superposition— team mental modelsreafference-corollary-discharge— sensorimotor prediction
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 63
- Forks
- 12
- Last commit
- Jul 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
active-inference-robotics- Source
- github.com/plurigrid/asi