Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
SkillAI & modelsArchitecture Decision Record: context-decision-consequences, for decisions that are expensive to reverse. Written under docs/adr/.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Architecture Decision Record (ADR) skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit in plugin/skills/adr/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Trigger phrases: "adr", "architecture decision", "decision record", "why this approach", "why we chose", "why we went with", "nobody remembers why", "why we picked"
When
On an architecture/technology choice that is expensive to reverse, long-lived, or contested (database selection, auth strategy, critical pattern). Small/reversible decisions do not require an ADR.
On a team, the record ALSO goes on the board
docs/ is gitignored in an install, so an ADR written there reaches the machine that wrote it and nobody else —
which is the opposite of what a decision record is for. When a teamboard exists, record it with
board.sh decide "<title>" "<context + decision + consequences>" as well: the board is shared, so it arrives at
every teammate's next session opening, and it travels even when the board lives in its own repository. The local
file stays the long form; the board entry is the part that has to reach people, so it must be readable on its
own — a title nobody can act on ("auth decided") is not a record.
Format (docs/adr/NNNN-short-title.md, ~1 page)
# NNNN. <Decision title>
Status: proposed | accepted | rejected | superseded (by NNNN)
## Context
Which problem/constraint requires this decision?
## Decision
What was decided (clear, one sentence + rationale)?
## Consequences
Pros / cons / accepted trade-offs.
## Alternatives considered
Why were they not chosen?
Principles
- Invariant: a new decision marks the old ADR as
superseded; an ADR is never deleted (decision history is preserved). - Numbered and dated; keep it short.
Deliberately bypassing a rule is a decision too
A gate the user knowingly overrode — a deferred DoD item, an accepted known gap, a trimmed scope — belongs here whenever its effect outlives the task. It is not a lesser kind of decision: choosing not to apply a rule shapes the codebase exactly as choosing a database does, and it is the one class of decision that leaves no trace in the code at all. Six months on, a rule that was weighed and overridden is indistinguishable from one that was never noticed, and the second is the one you would want to fix.
Record it in the same file as any other decision, with the fields that make it reversible:
## Bypassed
- <gate/rule> — why: <reason> — asked by: <who> — revisit: <condition or date>
revisit is the load-bearing field. A bypass with no condition attached is permanent by default, and nobody
chose permanence. See [[confidence-check]], which is where most bypasses surface.
DoD
- Decision + rationale + rejected alternatives recorded; status current.
- Any deliberately bypassed rule is recorded with its reason, who asked, and what would reverse it.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 22
- Forks
- 4
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
adr-byerlikaya- Source
- github.com/byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit