Topic Selection & Venue Fit (aejmac-topic-selection)
SkillDev toolsUse when deciding whether a macro paper fits the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) rather than AER, J. Monetary Economics, RED, or AEJ: Applied. Tests the broad-interest macro bar and venue fit; it does not write the paper or fix identification.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Topic Selection & Venue Fit (aejmac-topic-selection) skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills in AEJ-Macroeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmac-topic-selection/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
When to trigger
- You have a macro result but are unsure it is "AEJ: Macro-shaped" vs. a field outlet
- The question feels technically interesting but narrow to specialists
- You are choosing between AEJ: Macro, AER, JME, RED, and AEJ: Applied
- A coauthor wants to lead with a method (a new DSGE block, a new estimator) rather than a macro question
The AEJ: Macro fit bar
AEJ: Macro is the AEA's quarterly, broad-interest macro journal (founded 2009; one of four AEJs). The fit test has three legs:
- Substantive macro question of broad interest. Growth, business cycles, monetary/fiscal policy, labor-macro, international macro, or macro-finance — framed so a general macroeconomist (not only your subfield) cares about the answer. AEJ: Macro editorial decisions explicitly weigh breadth of topic and interest to the AEJ: Macro audience (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
- Quantitative discipline. The paper must measure something with a credible mapping from model or data to the number. Either a quantitative-theoretical apparatus (DSGE / HANK / structural estimation / calibration) or an identified empirical design (SVAR / local projections / narrative / proxy-VAR) — AEJ: Macro welcomes both.
- Policy or mechanism relevance. A memorable, decision-relevant quantity or mechanism, not just a sign or a significance star.
A paper that has only two of three is usually a field paper or an AER paper, not AEJ: Macro.
Venue decision table
| Signal | Better venue | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Result reshapes the general macro consensus; first-order, top-of-field | AER (or AER: Insights if short) | AEJ: Macro is high-quality but not the general-interest flagship |
| Deep, technical contribution mainly for monetary/business-cycle theorists | J. Monetary Economics | Field depth over breadth |
| Quantitative dynamic-GE methods paper for the macro-methods community | Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) | RED is the quantitative-dynamics field home |
| Micro-empirical paper that happens to touch macro aggregates | AEJ: Applied | Applied identification over macro mechanism |
| Pure macro theory with no quantification | Theoretical Economics / JET / RED | AEJ: Macro values quantitative discipline |
| Broad macro question + disciplined quantification + policy relevance | AEJ: Macro | The sweet spot |
Sharpening the question (do this before drafting)
- State the macro quantity in one sentence, with units: "a 100 bp monetary tightening lowers output by X% at horizon h," or "lifecycle earnings risk explains Y% of wealth inequality."
- Name the audience: which general macro readers should cite this, and for what claim?
- Pick the tool the question demands, not the tool you own: if the question is the dynamic causal effect of a shock, that is SVAR/LP/narrative; if it is welfare or counterfactual under a policy regime, that is a quantitative model; if it is both, plan a model-plus-evidence paper.
- Pre-empt "why not the field journal?" in one line — usually breadth + the AEA process + a quantity general readers want.
Checklist
- One-sentence macro question with a quantity and units
- Passes all three legs (broad interest / quantitative discipline / policy-mechanism relevance)
- Venue table consulted; AEJ: Macro beats AER, JME, RED, AEJ: Applied for this paper
- Tool (model vs. identified empirics vs. hybrid) chosen by the question, not by habit
- Audience named: which general macroeconomists cite it and for what
- Not a thinly-quantified theory paper and not a narrow field-specialist paper
Anti-patterns
- Leading with a method ("we add a new financial block to a DSGE") instead of a macro question readers care about
- A narrow business-cycle-accounting exercise dressed as broad interest — better at RED/JME
- Confusing "rigorous" with "broadly interesting": AEJ: Macro needs both
- Targeting AEJ: Macro as a consolation for an AER reject without re-framing the contribution for breadth
- A pure-theory result with a token calibration tacked on
Output format
【Macro question (1 sentence + quantity/units)】...
【Three-leg fit】broad interest? [Y/N] quantitative discipline? [Y/N] policy/mechanism? [Y/N]
【Tool the question demands】SVAR / LP / narrative / DSGE / HANK / structural / hybrid
【Venue verdict】AEJ: Macro vs. {AER / JME / RED / AEJ: Applied} + one-line why
【Audience】which general macro readers cite it
【Next step】aejmac-literature-positioning
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 146
- Last commit
- Aug 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
aejmac-topic-selection- Source
- github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills