Agent hierarchy
SkillAI & modelsThis skill lets your AI design a multi-agent setup for a repository: a lead agent that coordinates smaller worker agents, with each agent limited to its own area of the code. Every agent that produces work is paired with an independent agent that checks it, and a script that runs in CI keeps those boundaries enforced. Use it when you want to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent setup.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
After adding it, ask your AI to design or review a multi-agent hierarchy for your repository. It will lay out the agent split, the auditor pairings, and the CI script that enforces the boundaries.
Then ask your AI: use the Agent hierarchy skill
What your AI can do with it
- Design a hierarchy with a lead agent coordinating smaller worker agents
- Split agents so each one only writes to its own area of the code
- Pair every producing agent with an independent auditor that checks its work
- Add a script that runs in CI to keep agents from crossing into each other's files
- Set up, expand, audit, or fix an existing multi-agent setup
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by cbrock84/headcount in plugins/executive/skills/agent-hierarchy/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
A method for standing up an orchestrator → specialist-subagent hierarchy, extracted from a working implementation of ~24 agents over a 1,500-file monorepo, machine-checked on every PR.
The whole method in one paragraph
Split agents by write surface, not by topic. Two classes only: builders, which edit
inside exactly one exclusive surface and never commit, and reviewers, which are permanently
read-only and can always run in parallel. The orchestrator — the main chat — is the sole
committer. Write the surface map before any charters, keep it in one Markdown file, and
enforce it with a script that runs in CI. Each row also carries an authority — autonomous,
proposes, or escalates — which answers the separate question of whether that agent's work may
land without a decision; most rows are autonomous, and gating everything makes the gate
meaningless. Producer and auditor are never the same agent. For
each class of fact, exactly one file owns it and everyone else derives.
Why topic splits fail
"One agent on SEO, one on UI" is the intuitive split and it breaks immediately: both end up
editing tokens.css. Neither is wrong, and neither can be held responsible. A surface split
has no such overlap by construction — which is exactly what makes it checkable.
Order of operations
Do not start writing charters early; the order is the method.
- Inventory the real tree —
git ls-files | sed 's|/[^/]*$||' | sort -u. Report what is actually there before proposing anything. - Propose the roster — the smallest set where no two agents share a file. Each needs an id, a class, a one-line remit, and its exact globs. An agent whose surface cannot be stated in globs is not an agent; fold it in.
- Write the surface map — one Markdown file, one row per agent.
- Wire the guard —
scripts/agent-guard.mjs checkproves the map is coherent (no path claimed twice, no path unowned);agent-guard.mjs diff <agent>proves a given diff obeyed it. Both are needed: once the orchestrator commits, the authorship thatdiffchecks is gone, so it has to run while the work is still attributable. - Write charters last, in the format in the playbook: why the agent exists, what it must never do, the verification its surface implies, and a six-section return contract.
Rules that carry a failure behind them
- Producer and auditor are never the same agent. An agent that reviews its own output reliably approves it.
- The orchestrator is not one of the two classes. It is the sole committer, and giving it a surface makes it a builder that can also merge.
- One file owns each class of fact. Everything else derives from it, or the two copies diverge and nobody notices which is stale.
- Never remove a shared-core export because it looks unused. You cannot see the consumers from inside the core. Deprecate, announce, then remove.
This repository's own log
docs/DECISION-LOG.md is the live instance of the decision log described in the playbook. When a
decision is raised, assign it the next number immediately — before it is answered — and give it
lettered options with an explicit recommendation. Never renumber, never reuse a number, and record
resolutions in place rather than deleting them.
Never
- Add an agent before the surface it will own exists. The map comes first, the agent second.
- Let two agents hold a write claim on the same path. Overlap resolves itself as a race.
- Hand-edit a generated artifact instead of the source it derives from.
- Skip the guard because the change is small. Small changes are how surfaces drift.
References
references/playbook.md— the full 415-line playbook: surface splitting, the guard, the registry, the decision log, anti-patterns with their failure modes, sizing, multi-repo and shared-core layouts, the charter format, and a day-one checklist.references/starter-rosters.md— concrete rosters for a mobile-app portfolio, a game portfolio, and a shared core, with producer/auditor pairings.references/bootstrap-prompt.md— a fill-in-the-blanks prompt for standing this up in a fresh session against a target repo.scripts/agent-guard.mjs— the executable guard. No dependencies, Node 18+.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 209
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
agent-hierarchy- Source
- github.com/cbrock84/headcount