Agent Lifecycle Management
SkillAI & modelsA skill for ai & models by thelobbi.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Agent Lifecycle Management skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by thelobbi/claude in plugins/claude-code-expert/skills-old/agent-lifecycle/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Complete guide to managing sub-agent and teammate lifecycle in Claude Code — health checks, idle detection, cleanup, retention, and the mandatory audit loop.
The Orchestration-First Principle
Claude should prefer to orchestrate rather than do work directly. When a task has multiple components or would benefit from specialized review:
- Break the task into work units
- Assign each to the best-fit agent type
- Run agents in parallel where possible
- Audit every agent's output
- Clean up when done
Direct work is the fallback, not the default.
Agent Lifecycle States
┌──────────┐
┌────────→│ active │──────────┐
│ └──────────┘ │
│ │ │
spawn/resume no output completes
│ >60s │
│ ↓ ↓
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ spawning │ │ idle │ │ completed│
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘
│ │
no response collected?
>120s │
↓ yes/ \no
┌──────────┐ ↓ ↓
│ stalled │ released orphaned
└──────────┘
│
terminate
↓
┌──────────┐
│ errored │
└──────────┘
Health Check Protocol
When to Check
- During orchestration: Every 2 minutes
- After fan-out: Once all agents are spawned
- Before fan-in: Before collecting results
- On completion: Before producing final output
How to Check
For foreground agents: They return results when complete. No polling needed.
For background agents: Use SendMessage to check in:
SendMessage(to: "agent-id", message: "Status check: progress on your task?")
For agent teams: Teammates communicate via shared task list. Check TaskList for stale assignments.
Check-In Message Template
"Status check on your assigned task: [{task}].
Reply with one of:
- WORKING: {current activity}
- BLOCKED: {what's blocking}
- DONE: {summary}
- NEEDS_HELP: {what you need}"
Idle Detection & Cleanup
Detection Signals
| Signal | Threshold | Action |
|---|---|---|
| No output | 60s | Send check-in |
| No response to check-in | 30s | Mark stalled |
| Stalled | 180s | Terminate, reassign |
| Completed but uncollected | 60s | Collect results |
| Errored | Immediate | Collect partial, log |
Cleanup Procedure
cleanup_steps:
1_identify:
- List all agent IDs from spawn records
- Check each agent's last known state
- Identify: completed, idle, stalled, errored
2_collect:
- For completed agents: gather results
- For errored agents: gather partial output + error
- For stalled agents: attempt final check-in
3_terminate:
- Release completed agents (results collected)
- Terminate stalled agents (no response after 3 min)
- Terminate errored agents (unrecoverable)
- Keep active agents running
4_report:
- Log cleanup summary
- Report any lost work
- Suggest task reassignment if needed
Token-Aware Cleanup
Track cumulative token usage across all agents:
Per-agent budget = total_budget / num_agents
If agent exceeds 150% of per-agent budget → flag for review
If total usage exceeds 80% of budget → switch to cheaper models
If total usage exceeds 95% → terminate non-essential agents
The Mandatory Audit Loop
Every agent's work must be audited before acceptance.
Audit Flow
Agent completes task
↓
Orchestrator spawns audit agent (code-reviewer or audit-reviewer)
↓
Audit agent reviews:
- Completeness (did it do everything asked?)
- Correctness (is the output right?)
- Consistency (does it match project style?)
- Security (any vulnerabilities introduced?)
- Tests (are new things tested?)
↓
Audit verdict:
PASS → accept, merge into deliverables
PASS_WITH_NOTES → accept, log improvement notes
FAIL → send back to original agent with specific fixes
↓
Re-do (max 2 rework rounds)
↓
Re-audit
↓
If still fails → escalate to user
Audit Agent Selection
| Original Agent | Audit Agent | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Builder/Implementer | code-reviewer | Correctness, completeness |
| Test writer | code-reviewer | Test quality, coverage |
| Security reviewer | audit-reviewer (opus) | False positives, missed vectors |
| Researcher | audit-reviewer (opus) | Source quality, bias |
| Doc writer | code-reviewer | Accuracy, completeness |
| Infrastructure | security-reviewer | Misconfigs, blast radius |
Audit Depth Levels
audit_levels:
quick:
checks: [completeness, correctness]
model: haiku
cost: low
standard:
checks: [completeness, correctness, consistency, security]
model: sonnet
cost: medium
thorough:
checks: [completeness, correctness, consistency, security, testing, documentation]
model: opus
cost: high
Agent Team Lifecycle
For Claude Code Agent Teams (Experimental)
Teams have additional lifecycle considerations:
team_lifecycle:
spawn:
- Lead session creates team
- Lead defines task list with dependencies
- Teammates join and claim tasks
active:
- Teammates self-coordinate via TaskList
- Direct messaging via SendMessage
- Lead monitors overall progress
idle_detection:
- Teammate hasn't claimed new task in 120s
- Teammate's current task hasn't progressed
- TeammateIdle hook fires
cleanup:
- Lead sends final status check to all teammates
- Collect all teammate outputs
- TeamDelete to dissolve team
- Prune any worktrees created
audit:
- Lead reviews each teammate's work
- Cross-check: teammate A audits teammate B's output
- Final synthesis by lead
Cross-Audit Pattern
In teams of 3+, use cross-auditing:
Agent A completes → Agent B audits A's work
Agent B completes → Agent C audits B's work
Agent C completes → Agent A audits C's work
This distributes audit load and provides diverse perspectives.
Retention Policies
When to Keep an Agent Alive
- Pipeline stage: Agent is between steps, waiting for upstream input
- Expensive context: Agent has loaded large codebase context that would cost tokens to rebuild
- Follow-up planned: User may ask for iterations on agent's work
- Background monitoring: Agent is running periodic checks
When to Terminate
- Task complete, results collected: No further value
- Idle >3 minutes, no planned follow-up: Wasting potential tokens
- Stalled despite check-ins: Likely stuck, won't recover
- Budget exceeded: Cost ceiling reached
- Circular work: Agent is repeating itself
Best Practices
- Always track agent IDs — maintain a mental or written registry of every agent spawned
- Collect results immediately — don't let completed agents sit uncollected
- Use background mode sparingly — foreground is easier to manage
- Match model to task — haiku for research, sonnet for implementation, opus for architecture/audit
- Set max_turns — prevent agents from running indefinitely
- Use worktree isolation — for agents that write code, prevent conflicts
- Audit before accepting — never skip the second-round review
- Clean up before finishing — no orphaned agents when orchestration ends
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 21
- Forks
- 2
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
agent-lifecycle- Source
- github.com/thelobbi/claude