AJPS Workflow Router (ajps-workflow)
SkillDocs & knowledgeUse as the entry point for any American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) manuscript. Routes to the right AJPS sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and which submission type (Article, Research Note, Correspondence) fits, and reminds you that AJPS re-runs your code via a third-party verifier before publishing. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
Then ask your AI: use the AJPS Workflow Router (ajps-workflow) skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills in American-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/ajps-workflow/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
The orchestrator for an AJPS submission. Figure out the stage and the submission type, then send the user to the matching skill. AJPS is the MPSA's flagship, Wiley-published, double-blind journal whose defining feature is mandatory third-party verification of replication materials before publication — so this router also makes sure reproducibility is engineered from the start, not bolted on at acceptance.
When to trigger
- Starting a new AJPS paper and unsure where to begin
- Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
- Deciding whether the paper is an Article, Research Note, or Correspondence
- Returning with a decision letter (route to
ajps-rebuttal)
First question: which submission type?
| Situation | Type | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full original study | Article (<= 10,000 words) | normal pipeline below |
| A methodology advance or a meta-analysis | Research Note (<= 4,000 words) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |
| Critique / correction of a paper already published in AJPS | Correspondence (<= 4,000 words) | ajps-literature-positioning + ajps-data-analysis |
The Research Note is not a short empirical paper — at AJPS it is reserved for methodology (including methodology in normative theory) and meta-analyses. Do not mis-route a small empirical study into it.
Routing map (stage -> skill)
Idea / fit? -> ajps-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? -> ajps-literature-positioning
What's the argument? -> ajps-theory-building
Is the design identified? -> ajps-research-design
Are the analyses sound? -> ajps-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? -> ajps-tables-figures
Does it read well + fit caps? -> ajps-writing-style
Will the code re-run for a verifier? -> ajps-replication-and-verification
How will it be judged? -> ajps-review-process
Ready to submit? -> ajps-submission
Got an R&R / decision? -> ajps-rebuttal
Default order
topic-selection -> literature-positioning -> theory-building -> research-design -> data-analysis -> tables-figures -> writing-style -> replication-and-verification -> review-process -> submission -> rebuttal
Iterate: theory <-> design <-> analysis usually loops several times. Critically, start the replication-and-verification package while you analyze — at acceptance an independent verifier re-runs your code, and an unscripted analysis cannot be fixed quickly under deadline.
Anti-patterns
- Treating reproducibility as a post-acceptance chore — AJPS verifies before publishing
- Mis-routing a short empirical study into the methodology-only Research Note type
- Sending a critique of a non-AJPS paper as Correspondence (it is for published AJPS work)
- Forgetting that table/figure captions and footnotes count toward the word limit
Router pass for American Journal of Political Science
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the political theory, design leverage, measurement validity, and scope condition; then test whether the manuscript addresses political-science reviewers who expect tight theory, transparent design, and a contribution that travels across political settings.
- Primary move: Run the pack as fit gate, evidence gate, writing gate, source-map gate, and output contract; stop when a gate lacks evidence.
- Decision ledger: return
claim / evidence / blocker / next editrows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly. - Sibling comparison: compare against APSR for field-wide breadth, Journal of Politics for broader political-science audience, Political Analysis for methods-first work; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
- Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open
resources/official-source-map.mdfor volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.
Output format
【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / replication / review / submit / rebut
【Type】Article / Research Note (methodology|meta-analysis) / Correspondence
【Route to】ajps-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
Supplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— political-science data + software by method../../resources/official-source-map.md— official AJPS URLs behind every fact in this pack
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 155
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
ajps-workflow- Source
- github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills
github.com/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills
Related picks
Skill · brycewang-stanford
The pick for Academic03-academic-writing
Skill · 24kchengye
The pick for Academichandoff
Skill · mattpocock
More in Docs & knowledgecanvas-design
Skill · anthropics
More in Docs & knowledgedoc-coauthoring
Skill · anthropics
More in Docs & knowledgewriting-for-agents
Skill · mattpocock
More in Docs & knowledge