Analyze Test Failures

SkillAI & models

Analyzes failing test cases to determine whether failures indicate genuine bugs or incorrect test implementations. Use when debugging test failures, investigating test errors, classifying failures as test bugs vs implementation bugs vs ambiguous behavior, or when given specific failing test names or

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Analyze Test Failures skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by jamie-bitflight/claude_skills in plugins/python-engineering/skills/analyze-test-failures/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Analyze failing test cases with a balanced, investigative approach.

Context

When tests fail, there are two primary possibilities:

  1. False positive: The test itself is incorrect
  2. True positive: The test discovered a genuine bug

Analysis Process

1. Initial Analysis

  • Read the failing test carefully, understanding its intent
  • Examine the test's assertions and expected behavior
  • Review the error message and stack trace

2. Investigate the Implementation

  • Check the actual implementation being tested
  • Trace through the code path that leads to the failure
  • Verify that implementation matches documented behavior

3. Apply Critical Thinking

For each failing test, ask:

  • What behavior is the test trying to verify?
  • Is this behavior clearly documented or implied by the API design?
  • Does the current implementation actually provide this behavior?
  • Could this be an edge case the implementation missed?

4. Make a Determination

Classify the failure as one of:

ClassificationMeaning
Test BugTest's expectations are incorrect
Implementation BugCode doesn't behave as it should
AmbiguousIntended behavior is unclear

5. Document Reasoning

Provide clear explanation including:

  • Evidence supporting the conclusion
  • Specific mismatch between expectation and reality
  • Recommended fix (to test or implementation)

Example Analyses

Example 1: Ambiguous Behavior

Scenario: Test expects calculateDiscount(100, 0.2) to return 20, but it returns 80

Analysis:

  • Test assumes function returns discount amount
  • Implementation returns price after discount
  • Function name is ambiguous

Determination: Ambiguous Recommendation: Check documentation or clarify intended behavior

Example 2: Implementation Bug

Scenario: Test expects validateEmail("user@example.com") to return true, but it returns false

Analysis:

  • Test provides a valid email format
  • Implementation regex is missing support for dots in domain
  • Other valid emails also fail

Determination: Implementation Bug Recommendation: Fix the regex to properly validate email addresses per RFC standards

Example 3: Test Bug

Scenario: Test expects divide(10, 0) to return 0, but it throws an error

Analysis:

  • Test assumes division by zero returns 0
  • Implementation throws DivisionByZeroError
  • Standard mathematical behavior is to treat as undefined/error

Determination: Test Bug Recommendation: Update test to expect an error, not 0

Output Format

For each failing test, provide:

Test: [test name/description]
Failure: [what failed and how]

Investigation:
- Test expects: [expected behavior]
- Implementation does: [actual behavior]
- Root cause: [why they differ]

Determination: [Test Bug | Implementation Bug | Ambiguous]

Recommendation:
[Specific fix to either test or implementation]

Key Principles

  • When uncertain, lean toward investigating the implementation
  • Tests are often your specification - they define expected behavior

Related Skills

  • test-failure-mindset: Set investigative approach for session
  • comprehensive-test-review: Full test suite review

Signals

GitHub stars
66
Forks
10
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
analyze-test-failures
Source
github.com/jamie-bitflight/claude_skills