Artifact Detection Tactic
SkillDev toolsDetect annotation artifacts and shortcuts in benchmarks
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Artifact Detection Tactic skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine in skills/artifact-detection/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Systematically probe benchmarks for annotation artifacts, dataset shortcuts, and spurious correlations that allow models to achieve high scores without the intended capability.
Stages
Stage 1: Hypothesis-Only Baseline Test
Search literature for evidence that partial-input baselines achieve unexpectedly high performance:
- Hypothesis-only baselines (NLI without premise)
- Question-only baselines (QA without context)
- Label-word frequency baselines
- Majority-class and surface-pattern baselines
Search queries: "[benchmark] annotation artifacts", "[benchmark] hypothesis only", "[benchmark] spurious correlations", "[benchmark] dataset bias"
If published partial-input results exist, record performance gap between partial and full input. Gap < 10 points above random indicates severe artifacts.
Stage 2: Contrast Set Construction
Identify whether contrast sets or adversarial evaluations exist:
- Search for "[benchmark] contrast sets", "[benchmark] adversarial examples"
- Check if CheckList-style behavioral tests have been applied
- Look for counterfactual data augmentation studies
Record performance drops on contrast sets. Drops > 20 points indicate reliance on surface patterns.
Stage 3: Format Manipulation Probes
Search for evidence of format sensitivity:
- Prompt template sensitivity studies
- Label name/ordering effects
- Verbalization effects in classification
- Input length correlations with labels
Record whether minor format changes cause disproportionate score changes.
Stage 4: Conclusion Synthesis
Aggregate evidence into artifact severity assessment:
| Severity | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Critical | Partial-input baseline within 5 points of full model |
| High | Contrast set drop >20 points OR format sensitivity >10 points |
| Medium | Known artifacts documented but partial mitigations exist |
| Low | Minor artifacts, full-input still required for high performance |
| None | No evidence of artifacts (may indicate insufficient probing) |
Output
artifact_report:
benchmark: string
overall_severity: critical|high|medium|low|none
partial_input_baselines:
- input_type: string # e.g., "hypothesis only"
performance: float
full_model_performance: float
gap: float
source: string
contrast_set_results:
- contrast_set: string
original_performance: float
contrast_performance: float
drop: float
source: string
format_sensitivity:
- manipulation: string
score_range: string
source: string
shortcuts_identified:
- shortcut: string
mechanism: string
exploitability: high|medium|low
evidence_completeness: thorough|partial|minimal
Yield Report
| Metric | Minimum |
|---|---|
| Literature sources checked | 5 |
| Artifact categories probed | 3 |
| Evidence items collected | 4 |
| Severity classification produced | 1 |
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 469
- Forks
- 37
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
artifact-detection- Source
- github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine