Artifact Detection Tactic

SkillDev tools

Detect annotation artifacts and shortcuts in benchmarks

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Artifact Detection Tactic skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine in skills/artifact-detection/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Systematically probe benchmarks for annotation artifacts, dataset shortcuts, and spurious correlations that allow models to achieve high scores without the intended capability.

Stages

Stage 1: Hypothesis-Only Baseline Test

Search literature for evidence that partial-input baselines achieve unexpectedly high performance:

  • Hypothesis-only baselines (NLI without premise)
  • Question-only baselines (QA without context)
  • Label-word frequency baselines
  • Majority-class and surface-pattern baselines

Search queries: "[benchmark] annotation artifacts", "[benchmark] hypothesis only", "[benchmark] spurious correlations", "[benchmark] dataset bias"

If published partial-input results exist, record performance gap between partial and full input. Gap < 10 points above random indicates severe artifacts.

Stage 2: Contrast Set Construction

Identify whether contrast sets or adversarial evaluations exist:

  • Search for "[benchmark] contrast sets", "[benchmark] adversarial examples"
  • Check if CheckList-style behavioral tests have been applied
  • Look for counterfactual data augmentation studies

Record performance drops on contrast sets. Drops > 20 points indicate reliance on surface patterns.

Stage 3: Format Manipulation Probes

Search for evidence of format sensitivity:

  • Prompt template sensitivity studies
  • Label name/ordering effects
  • Verbalization effects in classification
  • Input length correlations with labels

Record whether minor format changes cause disproportionate score changes.

Stage 4: Conclusion Synthesis

Aggregate evidence into artifact severity assessment:

SeverityCriteria
CriticalPartial-input baseline within 5 points of full model
HighContrast set drop >20 points OR format sensitivity >10 points
MediumKnown artifacts documented but partial mitigations exist
LowMinor artifacts, full-input still required for high performance
NoneNo evidence of artifacts (may indicate insufficient probing)

Output

artifact_report:
  benchmark: string
  overall_severity: critical|high|medium|low|none
  partial_input_baselines:
    - input_type: string  # e.g., "hypothesis only"
      performance: float
      full_model_performance: float
      gap: float
      source: string
  contrast_set_results:
    - contrast_set: string
      original_performance: float
      contrast_performance: float
      drop: float
      source: string
  format_sensitivity:
    - manipulation: string
      score_range: string
      source: string
  shortcuts_identified:
    - shortcut: string
      mechanism: string
      exploitability: high|medium|low
  evidence_completeness: thorough|partial|minimal

Yield Report

MetricMinimum
Literature sources checked5
Artifact categories probed3
Evidence items collected4
Severity classification produced1

Signals

GitHub stars
469
Forks
37
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
artifact-detection
Source
github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine