Auditing 21 CFR Part 11 trails for OpenMed pipelines

SkillCloud & infra

Lets your agent create and check tamper-evident audit trails with timestamps and signatures for regulated medical workflows.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Auditing 21 CFR Part 11 trails for OpenMed pipelines skill

About this capability

Generates and verifies 21 CFR Part 11-style audit trails — who/what/when, electronic signatures, and tamper-evidence — for OpenMed pipelines in GxP and clinical-trial (GCP) settings. Use when the user runs OpenMed in a regulated/validated environment and needs an attributable, time-stamped, tamper-e

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by maziyarpanahi/openmed in skills/auditing-part11-trails/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

In FDA-regulated GxP work (GCP clinical trials, GLP, GMP) any electronic record used to support a regulatory decision must meet 21 CFR Part 11: it has to be attributable (who), contemporaneous and time-stamped (when), describe what changed, be tamper-evident, and — where a signing event occurs — carry a controlled electronic signature. These map onto the ALCOA+ data-integrity expectations (Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate, +Complete/Consistent/Enduring/Available).

OpenMed's deidentify(..., audit=True) already emits a deterministic, PHI-free AuditReport that you can .sign() (HMAC-SHA256) and later .verify(). That gives you the tamper-evidence and attribution primitives; this skill wraps them in the who/when/what/e-signature envelope Part 11 wants.

This is a compliance-enablement aid. Part 11 compliance also requires validated systems (CSV), SOPs, and access controls that live outside any single library — a QA/validation lead signs off.

When to use

  • OpenMed runs inside a validated/GxP environment and each run must leave an attributable, tamper-evident record.
  • You need to wrap an OpenMed AuditReport with who/when/what + an e-signature manifestation (meaning, signer, timestamp).
  • You must verify a stored trail hasn't been altered, or produce CSV evidence for an inspection.

How OpenMed's AuditReport maps to Part 11

Part 11 expectation21 CFR citeOpenMed mechanism
Tamper-evident, accurate copies11.10(b),(c)AuditReport.to_json() + repro_hash over the canonical payload
Audit trail: what changed, when11.10(e)AuditReport.spans (action per identifier), input_hash/deidentified_text_hash, openmed_version, manifest_hash
Operational/authority checks; attribution11.10(d),(g)AuditSignature.key_id (signer/key identity) + your envelope's user id
Signature manifestation (name, date, meaning)11.50Your envelope fields signer, signed_at, meaning
Signature/record linking, non-repudiation11.70, 11.200HMAC-SHA256 over the canonical payload via .sign() / .verify()

The HMAC binds the signature to that exact report content: any later edit to a span, hash, or field changes repro_hash, so .verify() fails — that is the tamper-evidence.

Quick start

import openmed, json, datetime as dt

note = "Subject S-014 (DOB 1962-08-09) reported headache on 2024-05-01."

# 1) Produce the deterministic, PHI-free audit record for this processing step.
report = openmed.deidentify(note, policy="hipaa_safe_harbor", audit=True)

# 2) Sign it with a controlled release key (stored in a vault / HSM, never in code).
report.sign(b"<release-hmac-key>", key_id="omv-signer-2026")

# 3) Wrap in a Part 11 envelope: who / when / what / signature meaning.
trail = {
    "record": report.to_dict(),              # tamper-evident, no PHI
    "who": "j.smith@sponsor.example",        # authenticated user (your IdP)
    "when": dt.datetime.now(dt.timezone.utc).isoformat(),
    "what": "PHI de-identification of source narrative (study X, subject S-014)",
    "signature_manifestation": {             # 21 CFR 11.50
        "signer_printed_name": "Jane Smith",
        "meaning": "reviewed and approved",
        "signed_at": dt.datetime.now(dt.timezone.utc).isoformat(),
    },
    "system": {"openmed_version": report.openmed_version,
               "manifest_hash": report.manifest_hash},
}
with open("part11_trail.json", "w") as fh:
    json.dump(trail, fh, indent=2, sort_keys=True)

# 4) Later — verify integrity (optionally bind to the exact source/output text).
ok = report.verify(b"<release-hmac-key>", original_text=note)
assert ok, "AUDIT TRAIL TAMPERED OR KEY MISMATCH"

Workflow

  1. Authenticate the actor in your own IdP/access system (Part 11 needs unique IDs and operational checks — outside the library). Capture the user id.
  2. Run the processing step with audit=True to get the deterministic record.
  3. Sign with a controlled release key from a vault/HSM; record key_id. Never embed the key in source or the trail.
  4. Build the Part 11 envelope — who, when (UTC, contemporaneous), what, and the signature manifestation (printed name, meaning, timestamp) per 11.50.
  5. Append, never overwrite. Store trails write-once (WORM / append-only store). The audit trail itself must be protected and retained.
  6. Verify on retrieval with .verify(key, original_text=..., deidentified_text=...) to confirm neither the record nor the bound texts changed.
  7. Retain per the study/retention schedule; keep keys and any reversible mapping in a separate, access-controlled store.

Hand-off to / from OpenMed

  • Produce the record: auditing-deidentification-runs (deidentify(audit=True)AuditReport) is the source of the signed, PHI-free trail this skill envelopes.
  • Coverage evidence: auditing-safe-harbor-checklist documents that the 18 identifier categories were handled — useful as a CSV artifact.
  • No-PHI logging: enforcing-nophi-logging ensures the surrounding application logs don't leak identifiers into the trail.
  • HIPAA overlap: checking-hipaa-compliance — Part 11 audit controls and the HIPAA Security Rule audit-controls standard (164.312(b)) reinforce each other.
  • OpenMed runs on-device, so the record-generating step stays inside your validated boundary.

Edge cases & gotchas

  • Part 11 ≠ one library. The signed AuditReport gives tamper-evidence and attribution, but Part 11 also requires validated systems (CSV), SOPs, training, and access controls you implement around it. Don't claim "Part 11 compliant" from the audit object alone.
  • Unsigned = not tamper-evident. .sign() is a deliberate step; signature is None until called. Empty/None keys are rejected.
  • Key management is the crux. The HMAC is only as trustworthy as the key. Use a vault/HSM, rotate via key_id, and never store the key with the trail.
  • Contemporaneous timestamps. Use a synchronized, trusted clock (UTC) at the moment of the action — back-dating breaks ALCOA "Contemporaneous".
  • Append-only retention. A trail you can silently overwrite isn't an audit trail. Use WORM/append-only storage and protect it from the operators it audits.
  • No PHI in the envelope. The AuditReport is hash-and-offset only; don't reintroduce identifiers in the what/who free-text fields.
  • HMAC is symmetric. It proves integrity to holders of the key, not public non-repudiation. If you need third-party non-repudiation, layer an asymmetric signature over report.to_json().

Standards & references

Signals

GitHub stars
5k
Forks
666
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
auditing-part11-trails
Source
github.com/maziyarpanahi/openmed