Authoring GitHub Actions Workflows Safely

SkillFiles & storage

Helps your agent write and fix GitHub Actions workflow files so they load and run without errors.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Authoring GitHub Actions Workflows Safely skill

About this capability

Author and review GitHub Actions workflow YAML safely so syntactically-valid YAML can't ship a workflow that GitHub Actions refuses to run. USE FOR: editing, adding, or reviewing any file under .github/workflows/, writing run-name/name/if/env/run values that contain ${{ }} expressions, diagnosing a

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by dotnet/skills in .agents/skills/authoring-github-workflows/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

GitHub Actions workflow files are YAML, but valid YAML is not the same as a valid workflow. A workflow can parse cleanly with yaml.safe_load (or a casual review) yet still be rejected by GitHub Actions at load time — producing the opaque failure "This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue" with zero jobs started. This skill teaches the YAML-vs-Actions traps (the #-as-comment trap above all), how to quote expression scalars correctly, and how to validate with actionlint before merge.

Scope: syntactic vs. semantic. This skill is about the syntactic and structural correctness of workflow YAML — quoting, parsing, and actionlint-level validity that determines whether GitHub Actions will load and run a file at all. It is not about what a workflow should do or how an agentic workflow should behave. For semantic and functional guidance (designing workflow logic, agentic-workflow patterns, gh-aw authoring), use .github/agents/agentic-workflows.agent.md. The two are complementary: get the behavior right with the agent, get the YAML right with this skill.

When to Use

  • Editing, adding, or reviewing any file under .github/workflows/.
  • Writing a run-name, name, if, env, with, or run value that embeds a ${{ }} expression.
  • A workflow run failed with "This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue" and no jobs ran.
  • Eval/CI on main suddenly breaks for every run after a workflow edit merged, even though the change "looked fine."
  • Deciding whether a YAML scalar needs quoting.

When Not to Use

  • Authoring non-Actions YAML (app config, Kubernetes, Compose, Azure Pipelines, GitLab CI).
  • Pure shell/script logic inside an already-valid run: block (that is a scripting task, not a workflow-syntax task).

The #1 Trap: # inside an unquoted expression becomes a YAML comment

In YAML, a space followed by # starts a comment. In an unquoted (plain) scalar, everything from that space-then-# to end-of-line is silently discarded:

# BAD — the run-name is silently truncated at " #"
run-name: ${{ inputs.pr_number != '' && format('Evaluate PR #{0} @ {1}', inputs.pr_number, inputs.head_sha) || '' }}

YAML parses this as run-name: ${{ inputs.pr_number != '' && format('Evaluate PR — an unterminated ${{ expression. yaml.safe_load succeeds (it just sees a truncated string with a trailing comment), so the bug passes naive validation, but GitHub Actions rejects the malformed expression and refuses to start any run.

# GOOD — wrap the whole value in double quotes so '#' stays inside the scalar
run-name: "${{ inputs.pr_number != '' && format('Evaluate PR #{0} @ {1}', inputs.pr_number, inputs.head_sha) || '' }}"

The inner expression already uses single quotes, so double-quoting the scalar is safe. This is exactly the bug that broke dotnet/skills evaluation on main (PR #746 → fixed by quoting).

Other characters that force quoting in a plain scalar

Character / patternWhy it breaksFix
space then # (space-hash)Starts a YAML comment; truncates the valueQuote the whole value
Leading *, &, !, ?, |, >, @, `YAML anchors/aliases/tags/block scalarsQuote the value
Leading { or [Parsed as flow mapping/sequence (a bare ${{ }} starts with $, which is safe, but {{ after a leading char is risky)Quote the value
: then space (colon-space) inside the valueParsed as a nested mapping keyQuote the value
Leading/trailing spaces that matterPlain scalars strip themQuote the value
Values that are true/false/yes/no/on/off/numbers but must stay stringsYAML type coercionQuote the value

Rule of thumb: if a name, run-name, if, env, or with value contains a ${{ }} expression and any literal #, :, or leading special character, wrap the entire scalar in double quotes.

Workflow

Step 1: Identify the changed/authored workflow files

git diff --name-only origin/main... -- .github/workflows/

For each file, scan every line that contains ${{ together with a #, a colon-space, or a leading special character.

Step 2: Quote risky expression scalars

Wrap the full value in double quotes when the value embeds an expression and contains a # or other special character (see the table above). Prefer double quotes when the inner expression uses single quotes, and vice-versa. Do not escape the ${{ }} braces — quoting the scalar is enough.

Step 3: Validate with actionlint (authoritative)

actionlint understands the GitHub Actions schema and the expression grammar, so it catches exactly this class of bug that plain YAML linters miss. Download a pinned release and run it:

ACTIONLINT_VERSION=1.7.7
ACTIONLINT_SHA256=023070a287cd8cccd71515fedc843f1985bf96c436b7effaecce67290e7e0757
curl -fsSLo actionlint.tar.gz \
  "https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint/releases/download/v${ACTIONLINT_VERSION}/actionlint_${ACTIONLINT_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz"
# Verify the download against the pinned checksum before extracting/executing it:
echo "${ACTIONLINT_SHA256}  actionlint.tar.gz" | sha256sum -c -
tar -xzf actionlint.tar.gz actionlint
# Focus on workflow/expression correctness; silence shell/py style noise:
./actionlint -shellcheck= -pyflakes= -color .github/workflows/*.yml

On Windows PowerShell, use the actionlint_<ver>_windows_amd64.zip asset and Expand-Archive.

The truncated-expression bug surfaces as:

got unexpected EOF while lexing end of string literal, expecting ''' [expression]

A clean exit code 0 means the workflows are structurally valid.

Step 4: Confirm a YAML-only check is not enough

Do not rely on yaml.safe_load, yamllint, or "it parses" as proof. They accept the truncated-comment form. Only actionlint (or pushing and watching GitHub Actions parse it) validates the Actions layer.

Step 5: Keep the CI gate green

This repository runs actionlint automatically (see .github/workflows/actionlint.yml) on any PR that touches .github/workflows/. Ensure your change passes that check before requesting review. If you add a new workflow, the gate covers it automatically.

Validation

  • Every ${{ }} value containing #, a colon-space, or a leading special character is wrapped in quotes.
  • actionlint -shellcheck= -pyflakes= .github/workflows/*.yml exits 0.
  • No workflow run reports "This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue".
  • The actionlint CI check is green on the PR.

Common Pitfalls

PitfallSolution
Unquoted run-name/name with # inside the expressionWrap the whole value in double quotes
Trusting yaml.safe_load/yamllint/a code review to catch itRun actionlint; YAML-only checks accept the truncated form
Escaping ${{ braces to "fix" itDon't — quote the scalar instead; escaping breaks the expression
Using single quotes around a value that contains single quotesUse double quotes for the outer scalar
Adding actionlint with shellcheck enabled and drowning in pre-existing shell-style warningsRun with -shellcheck= -pyflakes= to focus on workflow/expression errors
Assuming a green YAML lint means the workflow will runPush and confirm jobs actually start, or rely on the actionlint gate

References

Signals

GitHub stars
5k
Forks
414
Last commit
Sep 2026

ahel review

  • S4info
    community integration — published by dotnet, not github

Automated review, not a security audit. Ruleset v1.

Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
authoring-github-workflows
Source
github.com/dotnet/skills