bio-atac-seq-enhancer-gene-linking

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: ABC-Enhancer-Gene-Prediction 0.2.2+ (Engreitz lab), ENCODE-rE2G v1.0+ (EngreitzLab), Cicero 1.20+, GenomicInteractions 1.36+, FitHiChIP 9.1+, HiC-Pro 3.1+, FAN-C 0.9+, MACS3 3.0+, samtools 1.19+, bedtools 2.31+.

Verify before use:

• CLI: <tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flags
• R: packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parameters
• Python: pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures

If code throws unexpected errors, introspect the installed package and adapt rather than retrying.

Enhancer-Gene Linking

"Which gene does this distal accessible region regulate?" -> Predict the enhancer's target gene using a model that combines accessibility activity, 3D contact frequency, and (optionally) sequence-based chromatin predictions. Output is a per-(enhancer, gene) score that can be thresholded for high-confidence calls.

• CLI: ABC pipeline (run.neighborhoods.py, predict.py from Engreitz lab)
• CLI: ENCODE-rE2G (Snakemake-based; ENCODE 4 enhancer-gene standard)
• R: Cicero (ATAC-only; covered in atac-seq/co-accessibility)
• CLI: FitHiChIP / hichipper for HiChIP H3K27ac loops
• Database: EpiMap (Boix 2021), GeneHancer, FANTOM5 (pre-computed reference)

ABC and ENCODE-rE2G are the canonical predictors when Hi-C/Micro-C data is available. Cicero is the ATAC-only fallback. CRISPRi-FlowFISH (Fulco 2019) is the gold-standard experimental validation.

Algorithmic Taxonomy

Method	Inputs	Mathematics	Strength	Fails when
ABC (Fulco 2019, Nasser 2021)	ATAC + H3K27ac + Hi-C/Micro-C	ABC = (Activity_E x Contact_E,G) / sum_e(Activity_e x Contact_e,G); threshold typically >= 0.02	Mechanistically grounded; published gold-standard for human cell lines	Requires matched Hi-C / Micro-C; cell-type-specific; default contact uses average across 10 ENCODE cell types if Hi-C not available
ENCODE-rE2G (Gschwind 2023)	ATAC + H3K27ac + (Hi-C optional)	Logistic regression trained on CRISPRi-FlowFISH ground truth; uses ABC features + sequence features + distance	ENCODE 4 standard; pre-trained models for many cell types	Pre-trained models only available for ENCODE cell types; retraining requires CRISPRi data
Cicero (Pliner 2018)	scATAC peak-cell matrix	Graphical lasso on metacell co-accessibility	ATAC-only; works without Hi-C	Less concordant with Hi-C than ABC; cis-distance-limited; alpha-sensitive
HiChIP H3K27ac + FitHiChIP	H3K27ac HiChIP	Statistically significant loops at FDR < 0.05	Direct experimental loop measurement; cell-type-specific; orthogonal to ATAC	Requires HiChIP wet-lab; only captures loops within HiChIP resolution (~10 kb)
Hi-C + HiCCUPS	Bulk Hi-C	Fold-enrichment loop calling	Most-validated 3D contact method	Resolution typically 5-25 kb; misses sub-loop fine structure
Capture Hi-C / PCHi-C (CHiCAGO)	Promoter Capture Hi-C	Asymptotic CHiCAGO score	High-resolution promoter-anchored	Wet-lab cost; promoter capture only
EpiMap (Boix 2021) reference	None (pre-computed lookup)	Bulk-derived enhancer-gene predictions in 833 epigenomes	Fast, comprehensive	Cell-type-agnostic for tissues outside the reference set
GeneHancer / FANTOM5 (legacy)	None (pre-computed lookup)	Pre-computed; varied methods per database	Comprehensive lookup; widely cited	Older; less reliable than ABC for cell-type-specific

Methodology evolves; verify against current Engreitz lab releases (ABC), ENCODE 4 publications (ENCODE-rE2G), and Mumbach 2017 (HiChIP) before locking pipelines.

ABC Mathematics

For each candidate (enhancer E, gene G) pair within the cis window (default 5 Mb):

ABC(E -> G) = Activity_E * Contact_E,G / sum_{all e in window}(Activity_e * Contact_e,G)

• Activity_E = ATAC reads at E * H3K27ac reads at E (geometric mean of normalized signals; reflects "enhancer strength")
• Contact_E,G = Hi-C/Micro-C contact frequency from E to G's TSS (after distance-correction)
• Window = +/- 5 Mb cis (default; ENCODE-rE2G uses 1 Mb)

Threshold typical: ABC >= 0.02 for high-confidence; >= 0.01 for exploratory.

When Hi-C is unavailable, ABC uses an "average contact" averaged across 10 ENCODE Hi-C cell types as proxy (Nasser 2021); it performs comparably to cell-type-matched Hi-C. The alternative powerlaw approximation of contact-vs-distance is the Fulco 2019 fallback.

ENCODE-rE2G Differences from ABC

ENCODE-rE2G (Gschwind et al 2023, bioRxiv) is a reformulation:

• Logistic regression trained on CRISPRi-FlowFISH ground truth (~10 cell types)
• Features: ABC score components + 3D contact + distance + activity ratios
• Multiple feature configurations: "abc-features", "no-hic-features" for cells without 3D data
• Output: Per-pair probability of regulatory connection
• Pre-trained models for ENCODE cell lines; logistic params vary by cell type

ENCODE-rE2G generally outperforms ABC at CRISPRi recall, especially at modest distances (50-500 kb). For ENCODE cell types, prefer ENCODE-rE2G; for novel cell types, ABC remains the default.

Per-Tool Failure Modes

ABC -- Wrong cell-type-matched Hi-C

Trigger: Using K562 Hi-C contact when actual cell type is GM12878.

Mechanism: Contact frequencies differ across cell types at compartment and TAD boundaries; using mismatched Hi-C produces wrong ABC scores.

Symptom: ABC predictions concentrate at known K562-specific loci even when ATAC data is from GM12878.

Fix: Use cell-type-matched Hi-C or Micro-C. If unavailable, ABC's "average HiC" (10-cell-type pooled) is the documented fallback with acknowledged degradation. Document the proxy in methods.

ABC -- H3K27ac normalization

Trigger: H3K27ac ChIP-seq with different sequencing depth than ATAC.

Mechanism: ABC's "Activity" is the geometric mean of accessibility and H3K27ac signals; both must be normalized to the same scale.

Symptom: Activity scores skewed; some peaks have very high activity from H3K27ac alone, others from ATAC alone.

Fix: Normalize both signals to reads-per-million in peaks (RPM-IP) before combining. Use ABC's --qnorm flag with a quantile-normalization reference file (e.g. --qnorm reference/EnhancersQNormRef.K562.txt from the ABC repo).

ENCODE-rE2G -- Cell type not in pre-trained set

Trigger: Running pre-trained model on a primary cell type not in CRISPRi training.

Mechanism: Logistic regression coefficients learned from ENCODE cell types may not transfer to primary tissues.

Fix: Use the closest ENCODE cell type (myeloid lineage -> K562; lymphoid -> GM12878; hepatic -> HepG2). Document the proxy. For high-stakes use, custom retraining requires CRISPRi-FlowFISH data.

Cicero -- No Hi-C concordance benchmark

Trigger: Reporting Cicero connections as enhancer-gene calls without external validation.

Mechanism: Cicero is statistical co-accessibility; correlation with Hi-C 3D contacts is ~30-50%. Many strong Cicero connections are NOT Hi-C-validated.

Fix: When Hi-C is available, cross-validate; report both. When only ATAC, use Cicero with the explicit caveat that connections are co-accessibility hypotheses, not contact predictions.

HiChIP -- Loop calling threshold

Trigger: Default FitHiChIP at FDR < 0.05.

Mechanism: HiChIP loops are abundant (10k-100k per dataset); FDR alone produces a long tail of weak loops.

Fix: Threshold at FDR < 0.05 AND number of contacts per loop >= 5; or use the top N most significant where N = expected number of loops based on cell type.

EpiMap / GeneHancer -- Cell-type-agnostic limitation

Trigger: Using EpiMap or GeneHancer pre-computed pairs for a specific cell type.

Mechanism: These references aggregate across many tissues / experiments; cell-type-specific connections are diluted.

Fix: Use as a baseline / sanity check, not as the primary call. ABC or ENCODE-rE2G in the actual cell type is preferred.

Decision Tree by Available Data

Available data	Recommended method
ATAC + H3K27ac + matched Hi-C/Micro-C	ABC or ENCODE-rE2G (with cell-type-matched contact)
ATAC + H3K27ac, no Hi-C	ABC with average HiC fallback; or ENCODE-rE2G no-hic model
ATAC only, no H3K27ac	Cicero (atac-seq/co-accessibility); ABC with synthetic activity
ATAC + H3K27ac HiChIP	FitHiChIP loops + ABC; intersect for high confidence
Multiome (ATAC + RNA same cell)	LinkPeaks (Signac) for direct correlation; SCENIC+ for TF networks
ENCODE cell type	Pre-computed ENCODE-rE2G predictions (download)
Tissue with limited public data	ABC + acknowledge proxy; do not rely on EpiMap
Multi-cell-type scATAC	scBasset (atac-seq/deep-learning-atac) for sequence-based per-cell
Want experimental validation	CRISPRi-FlowFISH design; use predictions as targeted hypotheses

ABC Standard Pipeline

Goal: Compute per-(enhancer, gene) ABC scores combining ATAC accessibility, H3K27ac activity, and Hi-C contact.

Approach: Define non-promoter candidate enhancers from ATAC peaks, run ABC neighborhoods (which counts reads directly from the ATAC/H3K27ac BAMs) to compute per-candidate activity, then run ABC predict against a Hi-C contact matrix and threshold the per-pair ABC score.

# 1. (Optional, browser tracks only) ATAC/H3K27ac bigWigs -- ABC neighborhoods below reads the BAMs directly, not bigWigs
bamCoverage --bam atac.bam --outFileName atac.bw --binSize 50 --normalizeUsing RPGC \
    --effectiveGenomeSize 2701495711 --numberOfProcessors 8

# 2. Define enhancer candidates (typically MACS narrowPeak from ATAC)
# Filter to non-promoter regions
bedtools intersect -v -a atac_peaks.narrowPeak -b promoter_regions.bed > candidate_enhancers.bed

# 3. Run ABC neighborhoods (compute Activity per candidate)
# Script path: legacy ABC = src/run.neighborhoods.py; Snakemake-based modern = workflow/scripts/run.neighborhoods.py
python /path/ABC-Enhancer-Gene-Prediction/workflow/scripts/run.neighborhoods.py \
    --candidate_enhancer_regions candidate_enhancers.bed \
    --genes refseq_protein_coding.bed \
    --H3K27ac h3k27ac.bam \
    --DHS atac.bam \
    --chrom_sizes hg38.chrom.sizes \
    --chrom_sizes_bed hg38.chrom.sizes.bed \
    --ubiquitously_expressed_genes Genes.ubiquitously_expressed.txt \
    --cellType MyCellType \
    --outdir abc_out/

# 4. Run ABC predictions (Activity * Contact) -- generates ALL unthresholded links
python /path/ABC-Enhancer-Gene-Prediction/workflow/scripts/predict.py \
    --enhancers abc_out/EnhancerList.txt \
    --genes abc_out/GeneList.txt \
    --hic_file hic_data/ \
    --hic_type avg \
    `# --hic_type choices: hic | juicebox | bedpe | avg -- must match the Hi-C input format` \
    --hic_resolution 5000 \
    --hic_pseudocount_distance 5000 \
    `# --hic_pseudocount_distance (required): powerlaw fit at this distance is added as a pseudocount (config default 5000)` \
    --chrom_sizes hg38.chrom.sizes \
    --score_column ABC.Score \
    --cellType MyCellType \
    --outdir abc_out/Predictions/

# predict.py writes EnhancerPredictionsAllPutative.tsv.gz (all unthresholded E-G links).
# 5. Threshold at ABC.Score >= 0.02. The ABC Snakemake pipeline runs filter_predictions.py with its
# full set of --output_* arguments; for a standalone cut, select by the ABC.Score column (by header):
zcat abc_out/Predictions/EnhancerPredictionsAllPutative.tsv.gz | \
    awk -F'\t' 'NR==1{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++)if($i=="ABC.Score")c=i; print; next} $c>=0.02' \
    > abc_out/Predictions/EnhancerPredictions_thresholded.tsv

ABC.Score >= 0.02 is the standard threshold validated in Fulco 2019 against CRISPRi-FlowFISH; >= 0.04 is a stricter cut sometimes used in the ABC pipeline documentation for higher precision (no separate primary-paper calibration).

ENCODE-rE2G

# Snakemake-based; clone the ENCODE-rE2G repo
git clone https://github.com/EngreitzLab/ENCODE_rE2G
cd ENCODE_rE2G

# Inputs are supplied through config/config.yaml, whose ABC_BIOSAMPLES field points to
# an ABC biosamples TSV carrying the cell type and the ATAC / H3K27ac / Hi-C paths --
# there is no cell_type=/atac_bw= --config override interface.
snakemake -j1 --use-conda

# Output: encode_e2g_predictions.tsv.gz with per-pair ENCODE-rE2G.Score and thresholded predictions

Pre-trained models are at https://github.com/EngreitzLab/ENCODE_rE2G/tree/main/models. Choose by tissue similarity if exact cell type not present.

CRISPRi-FlowFISH Validation Framework

CRISPRi-FlowFISH (Fulco 2019) is the experimental gold-standard:

1. Design sgRNAs tiling each candidate enhancer
2. Transduce CRISPRi-expressing cells; FACS by gene expression (FlowFISH for endogenous; reporter for ectopic)
3. Sequence sgRNAs in low- vs high-expression bins; compute log2 enrichment per sgRNA
4. Significance: meta-test across sgRNAs in same enhancer

A 2-fold expression decrease (p < 0.05) confirms the enhancer regulates the gene.

For predictions to be publication-grade, ENCODE 4 expects:

• Test set sensitivity / specificity against published CRISPR enhancer-screen catalogs (Fulco 2019: K562 FlowFISH; Gasperini 2019: K562; Schraivogel 2020: K562 TAP-seq)
• Effect-size correlation between predicted score and observed expression effect
• Distance bias check (predictors over-rank close-distance pairs)

Reconciling Methods

Pattern	Likely cause	Action
ABC and ENCODE-rE2G disagree	Different feature weighting; different training distributions	Both valid; report intersection as high-confidence
ABC strong, Cicero weak	Co-accessibility sparse for that cell type	Trust ABC if Hi-C is matched
HiChIP loop with no ABC prediction	Loop is below ABC threshold; or peak set too narrow	Lower threshold or expand candidate enhancers
ENCODE-rE2G high probability, no CRISPRi support	Could be context-dependent biology or false positive	Prioritize for follow-up; not a publishable claim alone
EpiMap pair not in ABC	Pre-computed reference is cell-type-aggregated	Use ABC for cell-type-specific

Operational rule for high-confidence reporting: Predictions used for therapeutic target nomination must be (a) above ABC >= 0.02 OR ENCODE-rE2G >= 0.5, AND (b) consistent across two methods (ABC + ENCODE-rE2G or ABC + HiChIP), AND (c) validated experimentally (CRISPRi-FlowFISH preferred). Single-method high-score predictions are exploratory hypotheses.

Combining Multiple Predictions

Goal: Build a high-confidence enhancer-gene set by intersecting ABC, ENCODE-rE2G, and HiChIP evidence.

Approach: Load each method's output, merge ABC and ENCODE-rE2G on enhancer-gene pair above per-method thresholds, then flag pairs with HiChIP loop support for triple-method evidence.

import pandas as pd
abc = pd.read_csv('abc_predictions.tsv', sep='\t')
re2g = pd.read_csv('encode_re2g.tsv.gz', sep='\t')
hichip = pd.read_csv('fithichip_loops.bedpe', sep='\t', header=None,
                     names=['chr1','s1','e1','chr2','s2','e2','name','score'])

# High-confidence intersection
high_conf = abc[abc['ABC.Score'] >= 0.02].merge(
    re2g[re2g['ENCODE-rE2G.Score'] >= 0.5],
    on=['enhancer_id', 'gene'])

# Add HiChIP support flag
hichip_anchors = ...    # extract enhancer/gene pairs from HiChIP loops
high_conf['hichip_support'] = high_conf['enhancer_id'].isin(hichip_anchors)

Common Errors

Error / symptom	Cause	Solution
ABC predictions concentrate at TSSs	Did not exclude promoter regions from candidates	Pre-filter bedtools intersect -v against promoters
Activity scores all very small	H3K27ac or ATAC bigWig in wrong scale	Use RPGC normalization
ENCODE-rE2G model not converging	Pre-trained model loaded for wrong cell type	Match training cell type via cell_type config
Cicero connections used as enhancer-gene calls	Method confusion (co-accessibility vs contact)	Switch to ABC if Hi-C available; or document as co-accessibility hypothesis
Hi-C resolution too coarse	Default 25 kb resolution masks fine ABC structure	Use 5 kb or 10 kb if Micro-C available
FitHiChIP many loops, low specificity	Default FDR alone	Add contact count threshold; or use ENCODE-rE2G HiChIP-trained model
GeneHancer / FANTOM5 used as primary call	Cell-type-agnostic limitation	Use as baseline only

References

• Fulco CP et al 2019 Nat Genet 51:1664 (ABC; CRISPRi-FlowFISH validation)
• Nasser J et al 2021 Nature 593:238 (ABC genome-wide application)
• Gschwind AR et al 2023 bioRxiv 2023.11.09.563812 (ENCODE-rE2G; encyclopedia of enhancer-gene regulatory interactions; preprint)
• Mumbach MR et al 2017 Nat Genet 49:1602 (HiChIP H3K27ac)
• Bhattacharyya S et al 2019 Nature Communications 10:4221 (FitHiChIP)
• Boix CA et al 2021 Nature 590:300 (EpiMap reference)
• Gasperini M et al 2019 Cell 176:377 (CRISPRi at scale)
• Schraivogel D et al 2020 Nat Methods 17:629 (TAP-seq targeted Perturb-seq enhancer screen, K562; scRNA-seq readout)
• Pliner HA et al 2018 Mol Cell 71:858 (Cicero co-accessibility)

Related Skills

• atac-seq/co-accessibility - Cicero (ATAC-only enhancer-promoter inference)
• atac-seq/atac-peak-calling - Generate enhancer candidates
• atac-seq/consensus-peakset - Fixed-width enhancer regions
• atac-seq/deep-learning-atac - chromBPNet variant effect at predicted enhancers
• atac-seq/single-cell-atac - Per-cell-type scATAC inputs
• hi-c-analysis/loop-calling - Hi-C / Micro-C contact prediction
• hi-c-analysis/contact-pairs - Hi-C / Micro-C input
• chip-seq/peak-calling - H3K27ac peaks
• gene-regulatory-networks/scenic-regulons - Downstream TF -> target inference