RLHF Self-Reflection Scorer
SkillDocs & knowledgeOffline experimental post-call feedback scorer using supplied ratings and text heuristics. Use to demonstrate advisory review suggestions; no LLM inference, RLHF training, or memory integration is included.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
Then ask your AI: use the RLHF Self-Reflection Scorer skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by calle-ai/awesome-phone-call-agents in skills/call-rlhf-self-reflection-scorer/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
This skill demonstrates post-call QA with a small lexical scorer. It accepts a supplied transcript and optional rating, then returns predefined review suggestions. It does not collect user feedback, call an LLM, train a model, store RAG memories, or apply prompt changes. These are possible future host integrations, not delivered behavior.
Scientific Foundation
| Paper / Concept | Relevance |
|---|---|
| LLM-as-a-Judge | Using a strong LLM to evaluate the outputs of an agentic LLM correlates highly with human CSAT (Customer Satisfaction). |
| Self-Reflection (Reflexion) | Agents that critique their own past transcripts and generate "verbal reinforcement" prompts perform significantly better on subsequent tasks. |
| RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) | Incorporating explicit user scores (if provided post-call) alongside automated critiques bridges the gap between simulated and real-world quality. |
How it works
- The skill receives the transcript and any explicit CSAT score given by the user (if applicable).
- If the user gave a high score (>= 4), the interaction is marked as successful.
- If the score is low or missing, the skill checks a small set of text patterns and returns a mocked critique; it cannot establish a root cause.
- It outputs an
EvaluationResultcontaining the score, the identified critique, and a specific system prompt recommendation to fix the behavior.
Decision Matrix
| Explicit Score | Transcript Sentiment | Outcome | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
>= 4 | Any | EXPLICIT_USER (High) | Maintain current strategy |
< 4 | Any | SELF_CRITIQUE | Return a heuristic critique; not an explanation of the user's rating |
None | Smooth | SELF_CRITIQUE (High) | Baseline evaluation |
None | Friction detected | SELF_CRITIQUE (Low) | Flag friction point and generate patch |
Expected Outcomes & Metrics
These are unvalidated targets for a possible future evaluator, not measurements of this mock scorer.
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Critique Relevance | > 90% | The LLM-generated critique should match human QA audits. |
| Recommendation Actionability | > 85% | Recommendations must be directly usable as system prompt instructions. |
Limitations & Known Constraints
- Self-Correction Loop: This skill only generates the critique. A separate meta-agent is required to actually update the core agent's prompt based on these recommendations.
- Cost: The local helper has no LLM dependency. A future LLM integration would have separate costs and evaluation needs.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 104
- Forks
- 527
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
call-rlhf-self-reflection-scorer- Source
- github.com/calle-ai/awesome-phone-call-agents