Checking Model Compliance
SkillAI & modelsUse this skill when the user asks to check Simulink model compliance against a standard (MISRA, MAB, JMAAB, ISO, DO, IEC, EN, CERT C/CWE, AUTOSAR, Simulink Code Inspector (SLCI)), wants to run Model Advisor checks, or needs a compliance report with fix suggestions. For JMAAB/MAB, supplement deterministic checks with agentic review of uncheckable guidelines.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Checking Model Compliance skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by matlab/simulink-agentic-toolkit in skills-catalog/verification-validation-and-test/checking-model-compliance/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Runs Model Advisor checks for a named standard (or default configuration) and delivers a prioritized summary with fix suggestions.
When to Use
- Checking whether a Simulink model complies with a standard (MISRA, MAB, JMAAB, ISO 26262, DO-178C, etc.)
- Running Model Advisor checks against a named compliance standard
- Generating a compliance report with prioritized findings and fix suggestions
- Running a custom Model Advisor configuration file against a model
- Justifying or waiving specific compliance violations
When NOT to Use
- Building or editing model structure →
building-simulink-models - Writing behavioral tests →
testing-simulink-models - Structural validation only (unconnected ports) →
model_checktool directly - General model quality questions without a named standard (e.g., "is my model well decomposed?") — this requires a different workflow
Supported Standards
| Standard | Accepted Inputs |
|---|---|
| MISRA C:2023 | MISRA_C, MISRA C, MISRA |
| MISRA Simulink/Stateflow | MISRA_SLSF, MISRA Simulink |
| MAB | MAB, MAAB |
| JMAAB v5.1 | JMAAB |
| JMAAB v6 | JMAAB_V6, JMAAB06 |
| ISO 26262 | ISO_26262, ISO 26262 |
| ISO 25119 | ISO_25119, ISO 25119 |
| DO-178C/DO-331 | DO_178C, DO-178C, DO-178B, DO-331 |
| DO-254 | DO_254, DO-254 |
| IEC 61508 | IEC_61508, IEC 61508 |
| IEC 62304 | IEC_62304, IEC 62304 |
| EN 50128/EN 50657 | EN_50128, EN 50128, EN_50657 |
| Secure Coding (CERT C, CWE) | SECURITY, CERT_C, CWE, secure coding |
| AUTOSAR | AUTOSAR |
| Simulink Code Inspector (SLCI) | SLCI, Simulink Code Inspector |
Equivalent check sets (run once, report for both):
- ISO 26262, IEC 61508, IEC 62304, EN 50128/EN 50657, ISO 25119
- DO-178B, DO-178C, DO-331
Custom Checks and Configurations
Users may have custom Model Advisor checks or custom configuration files (.json exported from Model Advisor Configuration Editor). These are not standards — they are handled via:
- Custom configuration file: User provides a path → use
model_advisor_runwith'configuration'parameter directly (Path B) - Custom check IDs: User provides specific check IDs → use
model_advisor_runwith'checks'parameter directly (skip resolution)
Prerequisites
All script functions are in the skill's scripts/ directory. Use evaluate_matlab_code with project_path set to the skill's scripts/ folder so MATLAB can find them. Never use addpath.
Tools provided (always use these — never improvise with raw Model Advisor API):
| Function | Inputs | Output | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
model_advisor_resolve_checks | 'standard', '<NAME>' | struct with checks, checks_count, status | model_advisor_resolve_checks('standard', 'JMAAB') |
model_advisor_run | system, 'checks', {ids} or system, 'configuration', path | YAML with findings, status, check_summary | model_advisor_run('MyModel', 'checks', checkIds, 'token_budget', 8000) |
model_advisor_justify | model, checkId, blockPath, text | struct with status | model_advisor_justify('MyModel', 'mathworks.jmaab.db_0032', 'MyModel/Sub', 'Waived per review') |
detect_default_config | modelName | struct with config_path or empty | detect_default_config('MyModel') |
Workflow
1. Identify Standard, Model, and Scope
Determine from user request:
- Standard — map to supported name (see table). Defaults: "MISRA" →
MISRA_C. For "JMAAB" without version → ask user (v5.1 or v6) - Model —
.slxfile (ask if ambiguous) - Scope — full model (default) or subsystem path (e.g.,
Model/Controller)
Disambiguation rules:
- "JMAAB" without version specifier → ask (v5.1 or v6 — two distinct check sets)
- "ISO" without specifier → ask (multiple supported)
- "DO" without specifier → ask (178C vs 254)
- Multiple standards requested → resolve each, compare sets, run once if identical
2. Choose Path
Path A — Standard named: Proceed to step 3.
Path B — No standard, user says "run Model Advisor" / "check my model":
Run detect_default_config(modelName). If config found → skip to step 4. If empty → ask which standard (show supported list).
3. Resolve Checks (Path A only)
model_advisor_resolve_checks('standard', '<STANDARD_NAME>')
status: success→ notechecks_count, inform userstatus: truncated→ use returned config file path in step 4status: error→ report and stop
Gate: If checks_count > 100, confirm with user before proceeding.
Shortcut: If the user already has specific check IDs, call model_advisor_run directly with those IDs and skip to step 5.
4. Run Checks
model_advisor_run('<system>', 'checks', {<check_ids>}) % inline checks
model_advisor_run('<system>', 'configuration', '<config_path>') % config file
Use 'token_budget', 8000. If truncated, read full results from full_results path.
5. Analyze Findings
Classify from YAML response:
- Critical (Failed) — must fix for compliance
- Warnings (Warning) — should fix, may be justifiable
- Informational — low priority
6. Present Compliance Report
For non-MAB/JMAAB standards, use this template:
## Compliance Summary: <Standard>
Model: <model> [Scope: <subsystem> if scoped]
Result: X passed, Y warnings, Z failures
### Critical Findings (must fix)
| Check | Blocks | Fix Type | Action |
|-------|--------|----------|--------|
| name | N | param/insert/config/routing/arch | what to change |
### Warnings (should fix)
| Check | Blocks | Fix Type | Action |
|-------|--------|----------|--------|
### Passed
N checks passed.
### Suggested Next Steps
[5-7 prioritized actions max]
For MAB, JMAAB, or JMAAB_V6 standards, use this template instead (includes the uncheckable guidelines review as an integral part of the report):
## Compliance Summary: <Standard>
Model: <model> [Scope: <subsystem> if scoped]
Result: X passed, Y warnings, Z failures
### Critical Findings (must fix)
| Check | Blocks | Fix Type | Action |
|-------|--------|----------|--------|
| name | N | param/insert/config/routing/arch | what to change |
### Warnings (should fix)
| Check | Blocks | Fix Type | Action |
|-------|--------|----------|--------|
### Passed
N checks passed.
---
### Agentic Review of Uncheckable Guidelines (LLM-based — not deterministic)
> **Note:** This is a semantic evaluation performed by an AI agent, not a deterministic Model Advisor check.
**Model:** <model_name>
**Judgment:** PASS | WARNING | FAIL
**Confidence:** 0.XX
#### Critical (must fix)
| Guideline | Blocks | Fix Type | Action | Confidence |
|-----------|--------|----------|--------|------------|
#### Warnings (should fix)
| Guideline | Blocks | Fix Type | Action | Confidence |
|-----------|--------|----------|--------|------------|
### Evidence
[2-3 sentences citing specific model data]
### Recommendation
[Top 3-5 prioritized actions, or "No action required."]
---
### Suggested Next Steps
[5-7 prioritized actions max, combining both deterministic and uncheckable findings]
Fix Type values: param (block parameter), insert (add block), config (model config), routing (reconnect signals), arch (restructure — recommend only)
Conciseness rules:
- One line per check; max 3-5 block paths shown per check (state total)
- Target 40-60 lines; max ~80
- Offer "I can list all affected blocks for check X" for detail
7. Performing the Uncheckable Guidelines Review (JMAAB/MAB only)
This section explains HOW to fill in the "Agentic Review of Uncheckable Guidelines" section that is part of the MAB/JMAAB report template above. You MUST complete this before presenting the report to the user.
Skip this step ONLY for other standards (MISRA, ISO 26262, DO-178C, etc.).
For JMAAB, JMAAB_V6, or MAB standards → load and follow references/uncheckable-guidelines-review.md.
What to do: Evaluate guidelines that Model Advisor cannot fully verify — guidelines where semantic judgment is required or no check exists at all. Load references/semantic-evaluation-index.md to get the list of uncheckable guidelines, then:
- From the Model Advisor results, identify which checked guidelines appear in the semantic evaluation index
- For those guidelines, extract model data using MCP tools (
model_overview,model_read,model_query_params) - Apply the Quick Rules from the index for each applicable guideline
- For borderline cases, use the Semantic Gap column to calibrate judgment
Judgment: worst verdict across findings (FAIL > WARNING > PASS). Confidence 0.0-1.0. Do NOT issue FAIL if confidence < 0.5.
8. Fix Mode
Ask: "Would you like me to fix these issues?"
- No → stop (report only)
- Yes → load and follow
references/fix-mode.mdworkflow
9. Justification Mode
If user wants to justify/waive/suppress violations → load and follow the Justification section in references/fix-mode.md.
Guardrails
Always
- For JMAAB/JMAAB_V6/MAB: ALWAYS perform Step 7 (Uncheckable Guidelines Review) — the report is incomplete without it
- Show standard name + check count before running
- Include block paths in findings
- Follow Fix Order strictly (structural → diagnostic) to prevent cascading false failures
- Summarize, do not echo raw output
- Confirm with user before executing >=100 checks
- Ask the user for justification text before adding any justification — never fabricate rationale
- If a reference tool returns an error, report it verbatim — do not retry with alternative approaches
- Confirm which model to check if multiple
.slxfiles are present or the name is ambiguous - State the resolved standard name and version in the report header
- Report the exact check count from tool output
- When explaining failures, list all distinct root causes
Ask First
- Fix mode modifications — never modify model without per-batch confirmation
- Justification — always a human decision
- Running >100 checks — confirm scope is intentional
Never
- Claim "model IS compliant" — only report pass/fail; compliance determination is user's responsibility
- Escalate diagnostics before structural fixes
- Suppress findings without explicit request
- Guess parameter names — use exact
parameterfield from check output - Modify the MATLAB path permanently (no
savepath) - Run
slbuildor code generation without explicit user permission - Re-run checks unnecessarily — reuse violation IDs from the most recent run if the model has not been modified since; only re-run to get fresh hashes if the model changed
Error Recovery
| Error | Action |
|---|---|
UNKNOWN_STANDARD | Check for typo/alias (e.g., "MAAB" → MAB). If valid but unsupported standard, acknowledge and show supported list. |
LICENSE_FAILED | Simulink Check license required |
MODEL_NOT_FOUND | Ask for correct model path |
CHECK_NOT_FOUND | Release mismatch — tell user which MATLAB release needed |
CONFIG_NOT_FOUND | Stale path — ask for update or fall back to named standard |
EXECUTION_FAILED | Model may have compilation errors — suggest fixing first |
| Token budget exceeded | Read full results from full_results field |
HASH_NOT_FOUND (justify) | Model modified since last run — re-run checks for fresh ids |
JUSTIFICATION_FILE_ERROR | Check file permissions and license |
Copyright 2026 The MathWorks, Inc.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 103
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
checking-model-compliance- Source
- github.com/matlab/simulink-agentic-toolkit