/cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions
SkillAI & modelsYour AI can grill any plan that touches customer data, compliance, or production access before you act on it. It asks six security questions covering threats, blast radius, detection, response, and compliance, so weak spots surface before launch. Use it when launching features that handle customer data, before a SOC 2 or ISO audit, or after any incident or near-miss.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
After adding it, share the plan you want reviewed, such as a feature launch that handles customer data, and it will run its six-question security review.
Then ask your AI: use the /cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions skill
What your AI can do with it
- Interrogate any plan that touches data, compliance, or production access
- Ask six security questions covering threats, blast radius, detection, response, and compliance
- Review features that handle customer data before they launch
- Check plans ahead of a SOC 2 or ISO audit
- Examine what happened after an incident or near-miss
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by alirezarezvani/claude-skills in .gemini/skills/ciso-review/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Command: /cs:ciso-review <plan>
The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope.
When to Run
- Before deploying any system that touches PII / PHI / cardholder data
- Before signing a new vendor with data access
- Before a compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR)
- Before any architecture decision crossing trust boundaries
- After any near-miss incident
The Six CISO Questions
1. Threat Model
What's the STRIDE threat model for this system, and which threat is most likely?
- Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info Disclosure, DoS, Elevation of Privilege.
- Pick the top 3 by likelihood × impact.
2. Blast Radius
If this is fully compromised, what data is exposed and how many users are affected?
- Worst case in plain English.
- Quantify in dollars via FAIR-based ALE.
3. Detection
What signals indicate compromise, and how long until they're triggered (MTTD)?
- Logs alone are not detection.
- Define the detection rule, the alert, and the on-call.
4. Response
Is there an IR runbook for this scenario, and has it been tabletop-tested?
- If no runbook: build one before ship.
- If untested: tabletop before ship.
5. Regulatory Window
What's the regulator notification window if this scenario occurs?
- GDPR: 72h. HIPAA: 60d. State breach laws vary.
- Pre-write the customer comms template.
6. Vendor & Supply Chain
Which third-party vendors are in scope, and what's their security posture?
- Subprocessor list current?
- DPAs in place?
- Last security review per vendor?
Workflow
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/risk_quantifier.py
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/compliance_tracker.py
Output Format
# CISO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Threat Model
- Top threat: <STRIDE category> — <description>
- Likelihood: H/M/L | Impact: H/M/L
- ALE: $X / year
## Blast Radius
- Data exposed (worst case): <description>
- Users affected: N
- Estimated cost: $X
## Detection
- MTTD target: X hours
- Current MTTD: X hours
- Detection rule: <name>
## Response
- IR runbook: ✅ / ❌
- Last tabletop: <date>
## Regulatory
- Frameworks in scope: SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / GDPR
- Notification window: X hours/days
## Vendors
- New vendors added: N
- DPAs signed: N / N
- Security reviews complete: N / N
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 MITIGATE THEN SHIP | 🔴 BLOCK
Routing
/cs:cto-review— architecture alignment/cs:gc-review— DPA, regulatory implications/cs:decide— log risk acceptance/cs:boardroom— for CRITICAL risks
Related
- Agent:
cs-ciso-advisor - Skill:
ciso-advisor - Compliance:
../../../ra-qm-team/
Version: 1.0.0
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 26k
- Forks
- 4k
- Last commit
- Aug 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
ciso-review- Source
- github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills