Close Session Workflow

This repository-local package is adapted from cyberalchemy-orchestrator/.codex/skills/close-session. Its frontmatter guide is packaged at references/frontmatter.md so the skill does not depend on another runtime tree.

Step 0 — Triage

Create a node if any is true: repository documentation changed, domain code changed, an architectural decision was made, verification artifacts changed, or a contradiction was found or resolved.

Skip if: no documentation or code changed and the exchange was purely Q&A with no decisions. Say “Q&A-only session. No session node created.” and stop.

---

Step 1 — Write the summary and forward registers

The closing agent authors the node itself. First read references/frontmatter.md completely, then choose concrete topical tags, exactly one primary layer, and meaningful typed Connections. Do not delegate these judgments.

Write up to 10 sentences covering what the session set out to do, what was decided and why, and what was done. Use no subheadings or per-file detail in the summary. A reader should grasp the arc without access to the conversation. Draft the forward registers in Step 2 yourself.

---

Step 2 — Assemble the node

File: sessions/YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM-{short-slug}.md

Every new node emitted by this workflow has artifact_kind: session.

---
tags: [{tag1}, {tag2}]
artifact_kind: session
layer: {project | domain | capability | feature | task | others}
version: 0.1.0
created_at: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS±HH:MM
updated_at: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS±HH:MM
expires: {calendar date of created_at + 60 days}
decisions_made: true | false
contradictions_found: true | false
specs_updated: [paths or []]
promoted_candidates: [nodes or []]
expected_importance: {0-10}
importance_rationale: "{sentence}"
---

# {Title}

## Summary

{Maximum 10 sentences from Step 1.}

## Connections

| Document | Type | Description |
|----------|------|-------------|
| [real context or artifact](path) | `is-part-of` | Why this session belongs structurally to that context. |

## Open questions

{Undecided claim or conjecture. Omit if none.}

## Next steps

{Decided action, method known — imperative and priority-ordered. Omit if the arc is closed.}

## Recommendation

{The keystone among the items above and how to attack it. Omit on routine sessions; never use a placeholder.}

## Files touched

{Flat bullet list of paths. No table and no descriptions.}

## Extra section

{Include only when the user asked to register something specific from this session.}

## Connections is mandatory. Use the three-column table only for supported relationships with real targets. If no real relationship is known, replace the table with:

No real connection was identified in this session.

A session may use is-part-of toward its actual enclosing project, domain, capability, feature, or task context. It may use validates, contradicts, contextualizes, derives-from, or other only when evidence supports that relationship. contains is the inverse of is-part-of; add the inverse to a governed target only when that target is in scope for the same change. Do not infer Connections from directory placement or from files merely read, mentioned, or touched.

Contradictions belong in ## Connections when a typed target relationship exists. Add separate contradiction prose only when it contributes useful narrative that is not duplicated by the edge row.

## Files touched is an operational record only and never generates Connections.

Forward registers

• The three registers are distinct. Open questions are undecided and become resolved, not “done”; Next steps are decided labor; Recommendation ranks across them and asserts nothing new. If a line seems to fit two, ask whether it can be done or claims a truth, then move it to the matching register.
• Open questions name an epistemic gap the session opened but did not close. If the method is already known and only labor remains, use Next steps. A question may remain here even when it mentions an existing artifact. File-path existence does not establish an edge; add a Connection only when a real typed relationship can be asserted.
• Next steps defer to the backlog. This repository has no backlog/ yet, so keep them body-only with promoted_candidates: [] until one exists.
• Recommendation obeys the subset rule. Recommend a direction, never assert the outcome; name the licensing fact or self-label a hunch. Reference only items in the sections above.
• Omit, do not pad. No open business means omitting the empty forward sections. Absence is the signal.

Hard cap: The body below frontmatter must not exceed 200 lines. The forward sections count toward the cap and have the lowest priority: trim them first, then omit them.

---

Step 3 — Final checks

Before finishing, the creating agent checks directly that:

1. the frontmatter is valid and follows references/frontmatter.md;
2. artifact_kind is session, tags are topical, and exactly one layer is selected;
3. ## Connections has supported typed edges with real targets or the explicit no-connection statement;
4. files touched have not been converted mechanically into edges;
5. the forward registers obey their distinct roles; and
6. the body stays within the 200-line cap.

There is no automatic review in this workflow for now. Any future review must use the repository's governed subagent workflow.