Cloud Cost Management

Overview

Cloud cost management here means two things: catching spend that changed unexpectedly, and finding spend that shouldn't exist at all (a resource nobody is using but that's still billing). Both are about protecting margin on infrastructure that's easy to lose track of once it's provisioned — this skill treats "the bill went up" and "we're paying for something idle" as related but distinct findings, and reports them separately.

This is spend on the infrastructure substrate itself (compute, storage, managed databases, networking). It is not PSA/contract billing reconciliation (see finance-pack) — this skill is about what the cloud platform itself is charging, not what the MSP bills the client for it.

Anti-triggers

• Azure retail pricing and inventory lookups — meter rates, quota headroom, and subscription/resource-group listings are the connector's own read-only surface; use azure-mcp-cost-and-capacity. This skill consumes those numbers to find anomalies and reclaimable spend.
• The raw metric or log query behind a spend signal — use azure-mcp-observability for the monitor and log surface itself.

Discovering available tools first

Never assume which cloud platform is connected:

1. Call conduit__search_tools with a query like "cost", "pricing", "billing", or "list droplets" to discover which cloud platform connector(s) are live and their actual tool names (e.g. azure-mcp__pricing, azure-mcp__monitor, azure-mcp__group_resource_list, digitalocean__list_droplets, digitalocean__list_databases, digitalocean__list_volumes, digitalocean__list_load_balancers).
2. More than one cloud platform can be connected — cover all of them.
3. Only call concrete tools that discovery actually returned. Not every connected platform exposes a first-class billing API through its MCP surface — where cost data isn't directly available, build the cost view from resource inventory and known pricing (azure-mcp__pricing) instead, and say explicitly that it's a derived estimate, not a billed figure.

Key Concepts

Cost spikes vs. normal variance

Apply the same discipline as capacity planning: a spend increase driven by a known, intentional change (a new resource provisioned, a planned scale-up) is not an anomaly — it's expected cost. Flag as an anomaly only spend growth that:

1. Doesn't correspond to a visible inventory change (resource count and sizing look the same, but the bill went up) — this is the strongest anomaly signal, since it points at either a pricing/tier change, a usage spike (egress, API calls, storage growth within existing resources), or a billing error.
2. Exceeds a reasonable period-over-period threshold (in the absence of a documented client policy, flag month-over-month growth beyond roughly 20% for review — state this as a default, not a tuned threshold).
3. Is concentrated in a single resource or service rather than spread evenly across the whole environment — concentrated spikes are easier to root-cause and usually more actionable than broad, gradual growth.

Orphaned and idle resources — the reclaimable-spend hunt

These are resources that cost money but provide no value, and they're the highest-confidence savings finding because reclaiming them has no functional downside (unlike right-sizing, which requires judgment about headroom). Check for, per platform:

Category	Azure	DigitalOcean
Unattached storage	Managed disks not attached to any VM (via azure-mcp__group_resource_list filtered to disk resources, cross-referenced against VM attachments)	Unattached volumes (via digitalocean__list_volumes, cross-referenced against Droplet attachments)
Idle load balancers / gateways	Load balancers or app gateways with no healthy backend pool members, or minimal-to-no traffic in azure-mcp__monitor	Load balancers with no attached Droplets or near-zero traffic
Stopped-but-billing compute	VMs stopped but not deallocated (still billing for reserved compute) — check power state distinctly from "stopped/deallocated" via resource health/monitor	Droplets powered off but not destroyed still bill for reserved disk/resources — flag long-powered-off Droplets
Idle managed databases	Databases provisioned with no recent connection activity in azure-mcp__monitor	Databases (digitalocean__list_databases) with no recent connection activity
Orphaned network resources	Unused public IPs, NICs not attached to any VM	Reserved IPs not attached to any Droplet

For each candidate, distinguish "confirmed idle" (clear evidence of no use over a meaningful window) from "likely idle, needs confirmation" (e.g., a resource with sparse but non-zero activity, or a standby/DR resource that's supposed to be idle) — never recommend deleting something without stating the confidence level and evidence.

Building a monthly cost trend view

1. Discover what billing/usage data each connected platform actually exposes through the gateway — this varies by platform, and not every connector surfaces itemized billing.
2. Where usable cost/usage data exists, build a month-over-month view scoped to whatever history is available, broken out by resource/service category where the data supports it.
3. Where cost data isn't directly exposed, build a resource-inventory-based proxy (current resource count/sizing × platform list pricing) and label it explicitly as an estimate, not an actual bill.
4. Always state the data source and window behind the trend view so the reader knows whether they're looking at billed actuals or an estimate.

Common Workflows

Cost anomaly report for a window

1. Discover connected cloud platforms via conduit__search_tools.
2. Pull cost/usage data (or the inventory-based proxy, if billing data isn't exposed) for the requested window and the prior comparable window.
3. Apply the spike-detection logic above; rank anomalies by dollar impact (largest absolute change first).
4. Separately, run the orphaned/idle-resource hunt across all connected platforms and rank by reclaimable monthly cost.
5. Return both sections — anomalies and reclaimable spend — clearly separated, since they call for different actions (investigate vs. decommission).

Reclaimable-spend sweep only

1. Discover connected platforms.
2. Run the orphaned/idle-resource checks above across all resource categories the connected platform(s) expose.
3. Rank findings by estimated monthly reclaimable cost, with confidence level per finding.

Error Handling

No cloud platform connector discovered

Say so explicitly: "No cloud platform connector (Azure, DigitalOcean) is available through the gateway, so there's no cost data to report." Do not fabricate spend figures.

Platform connected but no billing/cost data exposed

Fall back to the inventory-based cost estimate described above and label it as an estimate. Never present an estimate as a billed actual.

Ambiguous or ambiguous-confidence idle-resource finding

Report it with its confidence level and evidence rather than omitting it or overstating certainty — a "likely idle, needs confirmation" finding is still useful if labeled honestly.

Related Skills

• Cloud Capacity Planning — resource right-sizing and forecasting; a related but distinct judgment from cost anomaly detection
• Network Health Sweep — device/network health, a different infrastructure axis entirely