Competitive Intelligence Analyst
SkillDev toolsBuild competitive intelligence briefs following the CI cycle, Plan, Collect, Analyze, Disseminate. Profile competitors, create feature comparison matrices, analyze pricing, build positioning maps, and identify win/loss patterns. Use when preparing for product launches, sales enablement, or strategic reviews.
Use Competitive Intelligence Analyst in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop
Free. Sign in, add Competitive Intelligence Analyst and connect your AI. About a minute.
Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex
Then ask your AI: use the Competitive Intelligence Analyst skill
Details
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; Ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
No other account needed.
Add Ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by hoavdc/codexkit in skills/codexkit-competitor-intelligence/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.
When to Use
- When launching a new product and need to understand competitive landscape
- When sales teams need competitive battle cards
- During quarterly strategic reviews
- When a new competitor enters the market
Procedure
Step 1 — Define Intelligence Requirements
- Which competitors to profile? (direct, indirect, emerging)
- Which dimensions to analyze? (product, pricing, positioning, market share, funding)
- What decisions will this intelligence inform?
- Audience: sales, product, executive, board?
Step 2 — Competitor Profiles
For each competitor, build a profile:
- Company overview (size, funding, geography)
- Product/service offering
- Target customer and ICP
- Pricing model and known price points
- Go-to-market strategy
- Key strengths and weaknesses
- Recent moves (launches, hires, partnerships, funding)
Step 3 — Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature 1 | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Feature 2 | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Pricing | $$$ | $$ | $$$$ | $ |
Step 4 — Positioning Map
Plot competitors on a 2×2 perceptual map using two key dimensions:
- X-axis: e.g., Price (Low → High)
- Y-axis: e.g., Capability (Basic → Enterprise)
Step 5 — Win/Loss Analysis
| Scenario | We Won | We Lost | Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs Competitor A | 60% | 40% | We win on features, lose on price |
| vs Competitor B | 45% | 55% | They win on brand, we win on support |
Step 6 — Counter-Strategies
For each competitor, define:
- How to position against them
- Key talking points for sales
- Features/capabilities to highlight
- Objection handling for their strengths
Inputs
| Input | Required | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Competitor list | Yes | Names and categories |
| Dimensions to track | Yes | List of comparison areas |
| Internal product data | Yes | Features, pricing, positioning |
| Win/loss data | Recommended | Deal outcomes by competitor |
Output
## Competitive Intelligence Brief — [Market] — [Period]
### Competitor Profiles
[Summary per competitor]
### Feature Comparison Matrix
[Table with feature-by-feature comparison]
### Positioning Map
Enterprise │ Competitor B
│ ★ US
│
───────────┼────────────────────
│ Competitor C
Basic │ Competitor A
└──Low Price──High Price──
### Win/Loss Summary
[Table with win rates and patterns]
### Battle Cards
[Per-competitor: positioning, talking points, counter-strategies]
### Early Warning Signals
1. Competitor A raised Series C — expect aggressive expansion
2. Competitor B hired ex-Google VP Product — product pivot likely
Definition of Done
- All identified competitors profiled
- Feature comparison matrix complete
- Positioning map with clear dimensions
- Win/loss patterns analyzed (if data available)
- Counter-strategies defined per competitor
- Early warning signals identified
Examples
Prompt
Build a competitive intelligence brief for our project management SaaS.
Direct competitors: Monday.com, Asana, ClickUp.
Indirect: Notion, Linear.
Compare on: features, pricing, target market, integrations.
Include battle cards for sales team.
Quality Criteria
- All claims reference specific frameworks, standards, or quantifiable data
- Content matches the stated audience's expertise level
- Recommendations are actionable — each includes a concrete next step
- No unsupported assertions or generic filler language
Verification (4C)
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Do referenced frameworks and standards match their official definitions? |
| Completeness | Are all key concepts covered without significant gaps for the stated audience? |
| Context-fit | Would this be useful for someone new to this domain, or is it too advanced/too basic? |
| Consequence | If a stakeholder acted on this immediately, what could they misinterpret? |
Edge Cases
- Conflicting frameworks — State which framework takes precedence and why. Document the trade-off explicitly.
- Rapidly changing domain — Note information currency date. Flag sections likely to need updates.
- Audience has mixed expertise levels — Provide a glossary and mark advanced sections as optional.
Changelog
- v1.0.0 — Initial release
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 25
- Forks
- 13
- Last commit
- Oct 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
codexkit-competitor-intelligence- Source
- github.com/hoavdc/codexkit
Related picks
Skill · openai
The pick for Notionnotion-spec-to-implementation
Skill · davila7
The pick for Notionlark-markdown
Skill · larksuite
The pick for Markdownmarkdown-formatter
Skill · nvidia
The pick for Markdownmonday
Skill · anil-matcha
The pick for Mondaymarketing-project-management
Skill · a5c-ai
The pick for Monday