Crisis Communication
SkillDocs & knowledgeDraft crisis communication packages including holding statements, stakeholder updates, Q&A documents, and internal briefs. Follows ICS (Incident Command System) communication principles. Use during PR crises, data breaches, product recalls, or any event requiring rapid coordinated messaging.
Use Crisis Communication in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop
Free. Sign in, add Crisis Communication and connect your AI. About a minute.
Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex
Then ask your AI: use the Crisis Communication skill
Details
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; Ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
No other account needed.
Add Ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by hoavdc/codexkit in skills/codexkit-crisis-communication/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.
When to Use
- During a PR crisis, data breach, or security incident
- When a product issue affects customers at scale
- When media attention or social media escalation requires response
- When a compliance violation or legal issue needs external communication
Procedure
Step 1 — Severity Assessment
| Level | Criteria | Response Time | Approval |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Public safety, data breach, regulatory | < 1 hour | CEO + Legal |
| High | Major service disruption, media coverage | < 4 hours | VP + Comms |
| Medium | Notable customer impact, social media trending | < 24 hours | Director + Comms |
| Low | Minor issue, limited audience | < 48 hours | Comms team |
Step 2 — Fact Gathering
Before writing anything, document what is known:
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| What happened? | [Factual description — no speculation] |
| When? | [Timeline of events] |
| Who is affected? | [Customers, employees, partners — numbers] |
| What caused it? | [Known root cause, or "under investigation"] |
| What actions taken? | [Steps already taken to address] |
| What's next? | [Planned actions and timeline] |
Rule: Only communicate confirmed facts. Never speculate.
Step 3 — Holding Statement
Draft the initial public response (use within first hour):
[Company] is aware of [brief description of incident].
We are actively investigating and have taken immediate steps to [action taken].
[Affected parties] may experience [specific impact].
We will provide an update by [specific time].
For questions, contact [channel].
Principles:
- Acknowledge the situation
- Show empathy for those affected
- State what you're doing about it
- Commit to a specific update time
- Provide a contact channel
Step 4 — Q&A Document
Prepare answers for anticipated questions:
| Question | Answer | Approved by |
|---|---|---|
| How many users are affected? | [Specific number or range] | Legal |
| Is my data safe? | [Honest, specific answer] | Security + Legal |
| What should I do? | [Clear action steps] | Product |
| Will this happen again? | [Prevention measures] | Engineering |
| Will you compensate affected users? | [Policy decision] | Executive |
Step 5 — Stakeholder-Specific Messages
| Audience | Channel | Tone | Key Message |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customers | Email, in-app | Empathetic, transparent | Impact + what we're doing + what you should do |
| Employees | All-hands, Slack | Honest, calm | What happened + talking points + don't speculate publicly |
| Media | Press release | Professional, factual | Statement + background + contact |
| Regulators | Formal letter | Compliant, detailed | Full disclosure per requirements |
| Board / investors | Direct call | Strategic | Impact assessment + response + outlook |
Step 6 — Update Cadence
| Phase | Frequency | Channel |
|---|---|---|
| First 24 hours | Every 2–4 hours | Status page, social media |
| Day 2–3 | Every 8–12 hours | Email, blog |
| Day 4–7 | Daily | Blog, status page |
| Post-resolution | Final update + postmortem | Blog, email |
Inputs
| Input | Required | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Incident description | Yes | What happened |
| Affected parties | Yes | Who and how many |
| Known facts | Yes | Confirmed information only |
| Actions taken | Yes | What has been done so far |
| Legal review status | Recommended | Has legal approved messaging? |
Output
## Crisis Communication Package — [Incident Name]
### Severity: High | Status: Active
**Incident Lead:** [Name] | **Comms Lead:** [Name]
### Holding Statement
[Ready-to-publish statement]
### Q&A
[Prepared answers for 10–15 anticipated questions]
### Stakeholder Messages
[Customized message per audience]
### Update Schedule
[When and where next updates will be published]
Definition of Done
- Severity assessed and response timeline set
- Facts separated from speculation
- Holding statement drafted within response window
- Q&A covers top 10 anticipated questions
- Messages tailored per stakeholder group
- Update cadence committed and communicated
Quality Criteria
- All placeholder sections are filled with domain-specific content
- Structure follows the relevant industry standard or framework
- Language matches target audience (technical / executive / legal)
- Output is ready for review — not a rough draft requiring major rework
Verification (4C)
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Does the draft structure follow the stated framework or industry standard? |
| Completeness | Are all required sections present with substantive (not placeholder) content? |
| Context-fit | Does tone, detail level, and terminology match the intended audience? |
| Consequence | If sent to the intended recipient without further editing, what would fail? |
Edge Cases
- No existing template for this type — Use the closest available template and document all customizations made.
- Stakeholder requirements conflict — Flag conflicts explicitly in the draft. Do not silently choose one requirement over another.
- Output required in multiple formats — Produce the canonical format first, then derive others. Note any formatting limitations.
Changelog
- v1.0.0 — Initial release
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 25
- Forks
- 13
- Last commit
- Oct 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
codexkit-crisis-communication- Source
- github.com/hoavdc/codexkit
Related picks
Skill · larksuite
The pick for Markdownmarkdown-formatter
Skill · nvidia
The pick for Markdownoutlook_calendar
Skill · win4r
The pick for Outlookanalyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics
Skill · mukul975
The pick for Outlookslack-gif-creator
Skill · anthropics
The pick for Slackhive.slack-notifications-setup
Skill · aden-hive
The pick for Slack