Risk Register Manager
SkillMonitoring & opsBuild and maintain a project Risk Register per PMBOK 8 Risk Performance Domain. Identify risks, assess probability and impact, define response strategies, and track residual risk. Use throughout the project lifecycle, not just at planning. Do not use for operational incident response or security vulnerability scanning.
Use Risk Register Manager in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop
Free. Sign in, add Risk Register Manager and connect your AI. About a minute.
Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex
Then ask your AI: use the Risk Register Manager skill
Details
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; Ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
No other account needed.
Add Ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by hoavdc/codexkit in skills/codexkit-risk-register/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.
Purpose
Systematically identify, assess, and manage project risks using a structured register with probability/impact scoring and defined response strategies.
When to use
- project kick-off to establish the initial risk baseline
- sprint or milestone reviews to update and add emerging risks
- before major decisions to assess risk exposure
- when stakeholders request a risk assessment report
When not to use
- live incident response or post-mortem analysis
- security vulnerability scanning (use security tools)
- personal task risk assessment
Inputs
- project scope, objectives, and constraints
- project type (predictive / adaptive / hybrid)
- stakeholder list and their risk tolerance
- known assumptions and dependencies
- lessons learned from similar projects (if available)
Procedure
- Identify risks using multiple sources:
- Internal: technical complexity, resource gaps, schedule pressure, budget
- External: market shifts, regulatory changes, vendor reliability, geopolitical
- PMBOK 8 emphasis: sustainability risks (ESG, climate, social impact)
- Techniques: brainstorming, PESTLE analysis, Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS)
- Assess each risk qualitatively:
- Probability: Very Low (0.1) / Low (0.3) / Medium (0.5) / High (0.7) / Very High (0.9)
- Impact: Very Low (0.05) / Low (0.1) / Medium (0.2) / High (0.4) / Very High (0.8)
- Risk Score = Probability × Impact
- Red zone (≥ 0.25): immediate response required
- Yellow zone: response plan needed
- Green zone: monitor only
- Define response strategy:
- For threats: Avoid / Transfer / Mitigate / Accept (active or passive)
- For opportunities: Exploit / Share / Enhance / Accept
- Assign ownership — every risk has one named owner.
- Track residual risk — after response, re-score to verify reduction.
- SAFe integration — for SAFe teams, use ROAM board:
- R = Resolved | O = Owned | A = Accepted | M = Mitigated
Output
- risk register table: ID | Category | Description | Trigger | Probability | Impact | Score | Owner | Response Strategy | Residual Risk | Status
- risk heat map summary (red/yellow/green distribution)
- top 10 risks with detailed response plans
- escalation list for sponsor or steering committee
- risk trend over time (risk burn-down if tracked across sprints)
Definition of done
- every identified risk has a probability, impact, and score
- every red/yellow risk has a named owner and defined response strategy
- residual risk is assessed for all mitigated risks
- register is reviewable by stakeholders
Examples
- "Build an initial risk register for a 6-month ERP migration project."
- "Update the risk register after Sprint 5 — add 3 new risks we discovered."
- "We have 15 risks but no response plans. Help me define strategies for the top 10."
Quality Criteria
- All dependencies and prerequisites are documented
- Changes are reversible or include a rollback plan
- Security implications are assessed for each configuration change
- Monitoring and alerting are defined for post-deployment validation
Verification (4C)
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Are all configurations, permissions, and dependencies accurate? |
| Completeness | Does the setup cover dev, staging, and prod environments as needed? |
| Context-fit | Is the solution proportional to the problem (not over/under-engineered)? |
| Consequence | If deployed as-is to production, what is the highest-risk failure mode? |
Edge Cases
- Target environment has pre-existing configuration — Scan for conflicts before applying changes. Document what to preserve.
- Permissions differ between environments — Test in staging first. Document the minimum permissions required.
- Third-party service is unavailable or deprecated — Document fallback or alternative. Include health-check endpoints.
Changelog
- v1.0.0 — Initial release
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 25
- Forks
- 13
- Last commit
- Oct 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
codexkit-risk-register- Source
- github.com/hoavdc/codexkit
More in Monitoring & ops
Skill · anthropics
More in Monitoring & opsagent-eval
Skill · affaan-m
More in Monitoring & opspricing
Skill · coreyhaines31
More in Monitoring & opslark-okr
Skill · larksuite
More in Monitoring & opsdashboard-builder
Skill · affaan-m
More in Monitoring & opsbabysit
Skill · thedotmack
More in Monitoring & ops