Agent-Safe Pipeline

MCP serverEverything else

This adds an approval checkpoint for AI agents: consequential actions are held until someone authorizes them. Once it is added, your AI cannot carry out significant tasks on its own — each one waits for your sign-off first. It is community-maintained and available at github.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Add it, then use your AI as usual — consequential actions will pause and wait for your authorization before they execute.

Then ask your AI: use Agent-Safe Pipeline

What your AI can do with it

  • Hold consequential AI actions until they are authorized
  • Review each pending action before it runs
  • Approve or deny what the AI wants to do
  • Require sign-off for high-impact tasks

From the project's README

As published by decionis/agent-safe-pipeline in README.md.

Let agents propose. Let policy decide.

Agent-Safe Pipeline is the reference implementation of the Execution Authority architecture: AI-agent actions execute only through an independent authorization boundary, and every authorization decision leaves a verifiable evidence record.

This repository is a library and runnable reference implementation, not a hosted authorization service or a substitute for provider-side identity, least privilege, network isolation, and incident response. Its safety claims apply only when the documented trust boundary is preserved.

Agent -> immutable intent -> Decionis -> ALLOW / ESCALATE / BLOCK -> SafeExecutor -> API
                                      |
                                      +-> Presence -> verified human approval -> Decionis re-evaluation
                                      |
                                      +-> Decision Dossier -> compounding decision record

Agents can reason, plan, and propose actions. They must not determine whether their own actions are authorized, possess downstream privileged credentials, or choose which trusted handler runs.

Five-minute demo

Requirements: Node.js 22.14 or later and pnpm 9.

git clone https://github.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline.git
cd agent-safe-pipeline
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
pnpm --filter @decionis/agent-safe-example-basic demo

The demos use an explicitly non-production fixture authority. A production integration uses DecionisGate and DecionisGrantVerifier with server-side credentials.

const captured = intentCapture.capture(agentProposal, trustedContext);
const decision = await gate.evaluate(captured);
const result = await executor.run(captured, decision);

The executor accepts a captured intent and a decision. It does not accept an arbitrary callback from the agent. A sealed ActionRegistry maps action names to trusted handlers and validates parameters before consuming a single-use grant.

Golden adversarial demo

One legitimate path and eight adversarial attempts against the same boundary, offline, in a few seconds, with every expectation asserted:

pnpm --filter @decionis/agent-safe-example-golden-adversarial demo

A treasury agent proposes a USD 250,000 wire, a remote Chief Risk Officer completes a FIDO2 plus liveness ceremony, and exactly one wire executes. Injected authorization fields, a fabricated ALLOW, an asserted approval, a swapped receipt, a post-approval amount change, a replayed grant, 25 concurrent claims, a shadow observation, and an expired grant all fail to execute. The run exits 0 only when that holds. See examples/golden-adversarial-demo, the bank-audience walkthrough in docs/remote-cro-authorization.md, and the receipt semantics in docs/presence-evidence.md.

From the fixture to Decionis

The package is used in three stages. Each stage uses the same IntentCapture, ActionRegistry, and handler code, so nothing is rewritten between them.

StageAuthorityWhat it proves
DevelopmentcreateFixtureAuthorityPair (refuses NODE_ENV=production)The intent, registry, and executor wiring is correct
ShadowShadowPipeline over DecionisGate with mode: "SHADOW"What Decionis would have decided about actions that already run; no grant is ever issued
EnforcementDecionisGate plus DecionisGrantVerifier in SafeExecutorNothing runs without an independent decision and a consumed single-use grant

Decionis credentials belong only in the trusted executor process, never in the agent runtime:

DECIONIS_API_URL=https://api.decionis.com
DECIONIS_API_KEY=server-side-secret

See the package README for the complete enforcement example and docs/shadow-mode.md for the shadow rollout path.

Repository map

Production invariants

  1. Agent input contains only the proposed action, target, and parameters. Tenant, actor, downstream target, and credentials come from trusted runtime configuration.
  2. The exact canonical intent is hashed and expires quickly.
  3. Decionis independently decides. Network errors, malformed responses, missing grants, or binding mismatches fail closed.
  4. Presence proves a human approved that exact intent; Presence never directly authorizes execution. Decionis verifies the receipt and re-evaluates policy.
  5. The grant is bound to the intent, decision, audience, and expiry and is claimed atomically before the handler runs; the attempt outcome is finalized with the authority afterwards as evidence, never as authority.
  6. Downstream credentials exist only behind the trusted executor.
  7. Every decision is evidence-bearing. An ALLOW whose response lacks a dossier identifier or grant is refused as non-executable, and an executed result retains its consumed {decisionId, dossierId, grantId} binding. A dossier identifier is never an execution credential.

Presence supports two explicit integration levels. In DIRECT mode, the trusted executor coordinates Presence and returns the receipt reference to Decionis. In MANAGED mode, the executor asks Decionis to orchestrate Presence and polls Decionis for a terminal status. Both modes require independently signed Presence evidence, exact-intent verification, current-policy re-evaluation, and the same claim-before-handler grant path. Invitation delivery and Presence evidence are never execution authority, and approval cannot revive a five-minute intent after it expires.

See docs/trust-boundary.md before integrating a real downstream API.

Decision record

The Execution Authority architecture has two load-bearing properties. Position on the execution path creates control: nothing runs without an independent decision at the moment of action. The evidence record creates accountability that compounds: every decision adds to an auditable history of what was authorized, under which policy, on whose approval.

Every Decionis evaluation is recorded as a Decision Dossier, and each GateDecision returns the decisionId and dossierId of that record. Escalations attach the verified Presence receiptDossierId, and every executed action returns the consumed grant's {decisionId, dossierId, grantId, intentHash} binding, so execution results correlate to their evidence without extra bookkeeping. In the research vocabulary, dossiers compound into a Decision Chain: tamper-evident lineage linking evaluation, approval, and execution evidence across workflows. Decionis maintains that record; this repository's contribution is that execution cannot bypass it.

Treat dossier identifiers as audit and support references, never as execution credentials — see docs/decision-dossiers.md.

Research and specifications

Decionis Research defines the Execution Authority architecture, this repository demonstrates it as runnable, tested code, and the Decionis platform operates it as a hosted authority. The provenance chain is research paper -> protocol contract -> reference implementation (this repository) -> production service.

Published research:

  • Jejelowo, Festus. "The Execution Verifiability Gap: Why Model Governance Cannot Authorize Consequential Actions." Decionis Research, version 1.0, 21 August 2026. Canonical article · Archival PDF · Research index.

Companion notes on the Execution Authority model, the authorization protocol, Presence-verified human approval, and Decision Dossiers are in preparation. Following this repository's discovery rules, a publication link is added here only after its canonical article resolves publicly.

Research conceptImplementation in this repository
Execution Authority boundaryIntentCapture -> DecionisGate -> SafeExecutor
Protocol contractExactly the Decionis ExecutionAuthorityRequest and ExecutionIntentBinding contract on the wire; DecionisGate and DecionisGrantVerifier claim and finalize against the published OpenAPI
Intent integrityCanonicalIntentHasher plus the conformance/ hash vectors
Human approval evidenceDIRECT PresenceApprovalCoordinator or MANAGED DecionisGate polling; both require Presence receipt verification and Decionis re-evaluation
Trusted executionSealed ActionRegistry and atomic single-use grant consumption in SafeExecutor
Decision evidencedecisionId and dossierId on every gate decision; executed results retain the consumed-grant binding
Failure semanticsFail-closed production invariants and THREAT-MODEL.md
Observation without authorityShadowPipeline over a SHADOW-mode gate: failure-isolated, bounded, grant-free, and rejected by SafeExecutor; see docs/shadow-mode.md
MCP governanceexamples/mcp-tool-gate
Operational patternsexamples/shopify-refund-agent, examples/github-deploy-agent, examples/procurement-agent

Open core

The architecture, intent contract, execution boundary, client adapters, audit contract, shadow mode, conformance vectors, examples, and @decionis/commerce runtime are Apache-2.0. The narrowly scoped Claude Desktop wrapper in packages/commerce-mcp-claude-extension is MIT-licensed to satisfy that directory's extension requirement; its bundle preserves the CommerceGate runtime as a separate Apache-2.0 artifact with license and notice. Decionis operates the policy control plane behind DecionisGate: policy evaluation, grant issuance and atomic consumption, Decision Dossier signing and retention, and Presence. The seam is two exported interfaces, DecisionAuthority and AuthorizationVerifier, plus a published OpenAPI contract; the library checks no plan, key, or entitlement. OPEN-CORE.md states the boundary and the commitments that keep it stable.

Public-repository policy

This is intended to be the public, canonical reference implementation. It should not be mirrored: mirrors create contract and security-fix drift. Public content belongs here—architecture, package source, synthetic policies, and runnable examples. Production policy bundles, customer data, credentials, internal infrastructure, and private incident material do not.

Decionis remains the authoritative decision service, Presence remains the human-verification service, and their server internals can evolve independently behind versioned contracts.

Verify Decision Dossiers

The repository-owned dossiers/ corpus checks the offline verifier against synthetic ALLOW, BLOCK, and ESCALATE proof bundles, including an owned-workspace, execution-bound vector. Its private signing key is intentionally public so anyone can regenerate the corpus; it is not a production credential and cannot establish that a production dossier is authentic.

pnpm exec decionis-verify \
  --file dossiers/vectors/allow.json \
  --jwks dossiers/corpus-jwks.json

To verify the distinct production claim, obtain a live dossier through an authorized route and run the pinned verifier against the live JWKS without committing the dossier:

npx -y @decionis/verify@0.2.0 \
  --file /absolute/path/to/live-decision-dossier.json \
  --jwks https://api.decionis.com/v1/.well-known/decision-dossier-jwks.json

See the corpus README for regeneration, provenance, expected failures, and the trust boundary between synthetic conformance and production verification.

Status

The package is published as @decionis/agent-safe-pipeline. Install the latest stable release with npm install @decionis/agent-safe-pipeline; prereleases publish under the next dist-tag and require an explicit request such as npm install @decionis/agent-safe-pipeline@next.

Archived releases are citable under Zenodo concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22312955. The release-metadata contract explains the preflight checks, version-DOI verification, and human publication boundary.

Development

pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
pnpm verify

pnpm verify enforces formatting, Markdown lint, fixture conventions, canonical licensing, separate production/toolchain audits, deterministic performance tests, types, tests, and coverage thresholds of 90% for lines/functions/statements and 85% for branches. pnpm mutation checks that trust-boundary tests kill deliberate code mutations. pnpm fuzz runs deterministic property tests against canonical intent handling; CI also runs them weekly with a larger bounded sample. Installation activates the repository's simple-git-hooks pre-commit guardrails.

Testing escalations locally

@decionis/agent-safe-pipeline/testing ships LocalPresence and LocalAuthority, loopback doubles that the production clients talk to unchanged. They enforce the structural intent-hash binding, verify receipts the way Decionis does, issue single-use grants, orchestrate managed escalations, and record finalization. The person's ceremony is a method call or a local control route. See docs/local-testing.md and examples/local-escalation.

Fixture provenance and loopback origins

Every fixture-bearing file is listed in fixtures/manifest.json and checked by pnpm fixture:check: the unit tests under packages/pipeline/test, example sources, conformance vectors, the dossier corpus, synthetic policies, and the integration harness under tests/integration. The gate requires synthetic identities (synthetic- or fixture_ prefixes, tenants in the reserved UUID block) and parses every URL-shaped literal it finds, which must resolve to localhost, 127.0.0.1, example.com, or a .example or .invalid domain. Nothing in the tests, examples, or harness reaches the network beyond loopback.

Two consequences matter when you add or evaluate tests:

  • Loopback stubs bind to 127.0.0.1 on an ephemeral port and build their base URL from a plain string constant, const LOOPBACK_ORIGIN = "http://127.0.0.1", appending the port separately. A template literal that interpolates inside the URL, such as `http://127.0.0.1:${port}`, is read by the gate as literal text and rejected as an invalid URL. That is deliberate: the gate does not guess what an interpolated host would resolve to.
  • A new fixture-bearing file needs its manifest entry in the same change. Discovery uses git ls-files, so an untracked file is invisible to the gate until it is staged, and the manifest and discovery must match exactly.

See FIXTURE-PROVENANCE.md for the full construction rules and tests/integration/contract/ for the loopback harness that follows them.

Apache-2.0 licensed except for the explicitly scoped MIT Claude Desktop wrapper in packages/commerce-mcp-claude-extension. See LICENSE, OPEN-CORE.md, TRADEMARKS.md, SECURITY.md, and CONTRIBUTING.md. Report suspected vulnerabilities through GitHub's private advisory form, not a public issue.

Advanced
Delivery
mcp MCP server → your ahel gateway (mcp.ahel.ai) → every connected AI client.
Catalog kind
mcp-server
Gateway key
com-decionis-mcp
Source
github.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline
Hosted endpoint
https://protocol.decionis.com/mcp