Creating experiments
SkillDatabases & dataGuides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics.\nTRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create.\nDO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Creating experiments skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by posthog/posthog in products/experiments/skills/creating-experiments/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
This skill walks through the 3-step flow for creating a new A/B test experiment.
Core principle: draft first, iterate on details
Create the experiment as a draft quickly, then iterate on metrics and configuration. The user gets a tangible draft immediately and can refine it.
The 3-step creation flow
Step 1: What are we testing?
Gather these before calling experiment-create:
- Experiment name — descriptive, inferred from context when possible
- Hypothesis — what you expect to happen (goes in
description) - Feature flag key — kebab-case. Ask if they want a new flag or to reuse an existing one. The flag is auto-created — do NOT create one separately.
- Type — leave empty (will internally default to
"product". The"web"value is reserved for no-code experiments configured visually with the PostHog toolbar in a browser; it cannot be meaningfully driven via MCP. If a user asks for a no-code/toolbar experiment, point them to the PostHog UI instead of creating one here.)
If the user gives enough context to infer these, don't ask — just proceed.
Step 2: Who sees what variant?
This is about rollout configuration.
Before asking any rollout question, load configuring-experiment-rollout. The disambiguation wording, recommendations, and post-answer branches live there — do not formulate rollout questions yourself, and do not assume an example you remember covers the user's path.
Key decision points (covered in detail by configuring-experiment-rollout):
- Variant split (how many variants, what percentage each)
- Overall rollout percentage (what % of all users enter the experiment)
- Whether to persist the flag across authentication steps
If the user doesn't mention rollout specifics, use defaults: 50/50 control/test, 100% rollout.
Step 3: How to measure impact?
This is about analytics and metrics. Load the configuring-experiment-analytics skill for guidance.
That skill's first step checks for an existing shared metric to reuse before building a new one —
don't duplicate a metric the project already has set up.
Do NOT configure metrics on creation. Metrics are not passed to experiment-create — they are added
afterwards via experiment-update. This keeps the creation call lightweight.
When the user specifies metrics upfront, acknowledge them and add them immediately after creation. When they don't, create the draft and then guide them through metric setup as a follow-up.
How to create
Call experiment-create with:
{
"name": "Descriptive experiment name",
"feature_flag_key": "kebab-case-key",
"description": "Hypothesis: [what you expect to happen]",
"feature_flag": {
"filters": {
"multivariate": {
"variants": [
{ "key": "control", "name": "Control", "rollout_percentage": 50 },
{ "key": "test", "name": "Test", "rollout_percentage": 50 }
]
},
"groups": [{ "properties": [], "rollout_percentage": 100 }]
},
"ensure_experience_continuity": false
}
}
Flag config goes in the feature_flag object, in the flag's own filters shape (not the deprecated parameters keys).
Two different percentages live in there, do NOT mix them up:
filters.multivariate.variants[].rollout_percentageis how users inside the experiment are split across variants (must sum to 100, recommended to have an even split).filters.groups[0].rollout_percentageis the overall gate: what fraction of all users enter the experiment at all (0-100, defaults to 100).
Key details:
- Minimum 2, maximum 20 variants. No specific variant key is required — the analysis baseline defaults to the variant keyed
"control"when present, else the first variant (override withstats_config.baseline_variant_key). Convention: key the baseline"control"unless the user asks for specific keys. filters.groups[0].rollout_percentagedefaults to 100 if omitted.ensure_experience_continuitypersists a user's variant across authentication steps; leave itfalseunless the flag is shown to both logged-out and logged-in users (seeconfiguring-experiment-rollout).- Stats default to Bayesian. Only set
stats_configif the user requests Frequentist.
After creation
-
Always show the experiment URL. The
experiment-createresponse includes_posthogUrl— always display this link so the user can view and configure the experiment in the UI. -
Remind the user to implement the feature flag in code. Link to the experiment page and say "implement the flag as shown here" — the experiment detail page shows implementation snippets for the user's SDK.
-
Guide through metrics if not yet configured — load the
configuring-experiment-analyticsskill. -
Launch when ready — use the
experiment-launchtool.
Related skills
configuring-experiment-rollout— variant splits, rollout percentage, and who sees the testconfiguring-experiment-analytics— exposure criteria and primary/secondary metricsmanaging-experiment-lifecycle— launch, pause, ship, and end once the experiment exists
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 40k
- Forks
- 3k
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Others that do the same job
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
creating-experiments- Source
- github.com/posthog/posthog