Crypto Governance Guide

SkillCommerce & finance

Guide to DAO governance — voting mechanics (token-weighted, veToken, quadratic), proposal processes, delegation, and governance participation best practices. Covers Snapshot, on-chain governance, and real examples including Sperax, Aave, and Uniswap.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Crypto Governance Guide skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by nirholas/three.ws in data/skills/community/crypto-governance-guide/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) use various governance models to make protocol decisions. This guide helps AI agents assist users with governance participation.

Governance Models

Token-Weighted Voting

Most common model: 1 token = 1 vote.

ProtocolTokenVoting Platform
UniswapUNIOn-chain + Snapshot
AaveAAVE/stkAAVEOn-chain
CompoundCOMPOn-chain

Pros: Simple, aligns economic incentives Cons: Whale-dominated, low participation

Vote-Escrowed (veToken)

Lock tokens for governance power. Longer lock = more power.

ProtocolTokenLock PeriodPower Formula
SperaxSPA → veSPA7d–4yveSPA = SPA × (days/365)
CurveCRV → veCRV1w–4yveCRV = CRV × (days/365)
BalancerBAL → veBAL1w–1yveBAL = BAL × (days/365)

Pros: Aligns long-term incentives, reduces mercenary governance Cons: Capital lock-up, decaying voting power

Quadratic Voting

Vote weight = √(tokens). Reduces whale dominance.

ProtocolImplementation
GitcoinQuadratic funding for grants

Pros: More egalitarian Cons: Sybil-vulnerable without identity verification

Optimistic Governance

Proposals pass unless vetoed within a timeframe.

ProtocolImplementation
OptimismToken House + Citizens' House

Pros: Faster execution, less voter fatigue Cons: Requires active monitoring

Governance Lifecycle

Typical Process

Idea → Discussion → Proposal → Vote → Execution

Sperax Governance (Example)

PhaseActionDuration
Phase 0Discord ideationOpen-ended
Phase 1Forum SIP proposal48h minimum discussion
Phase 2Snapshot vote3 days, veSPA-weighted
Phase 3Engineering implementationVaries

Requirements:

Aave Governance (Example)

StepAction
ARCAave Request for Comments (forum)
AIPAave Improvement Proposal (formal)
VoteOn-chain vote (AAVE + stkAAVE weighted)
Timelock24h delay before execution
ExecuteAutomated on-chain execution

Voting Platforms

Snapshot (Off-Chain)

  • What: Gasless voting via signed messages
  • Used by: Most DAOs for governance votes
  • Cost: Free (no gas to vote)
  • Security: Relies on social consensus for execution

On-Chain Governance

  • What: Votes recorded on blockchain
  • Used by: Compound, Aave, Uniswap (binding votes)
  • Cost: Gas for each vote
  • Security: Enforced by smart contracts

Tally

  • What: Governance dashboard for on-chain proposals
  • Used by: Compound, Aave, Uniswap, and many others
  • URL: https://tally.xyz

Delegation

Many DAOs allow vote delegation — give your voting power to a delegate who votes on your behalf.

How It Works

  1. Choose a delegate whose values align with yours
  2. Delegate your voting power (you keep your tokens)
  3. Delegate votes on proposals on your behalf
  4. You can undelegate at any time

Benefits

  • For voters: Don't need to track every proposal
  • For DAOs: Higher effective participation
  • For delegates: Build reputation in governance

Proposal Analysis

When helping users evaluate proposals, consider:

Impact Assessment

FactorQuestions
ScopeHow big is this change?
RiskWhat could go wrong?
ReversibilityCan it be undone?
PrecedentDoes it set a precedent?
Economic ImpactHow does it affect token holders?

Red Flags in Proposals

  • Extremely short voting periods
  • Vague or poorly specified changes
  • Large treasury spending without detailed budget
  • Changes that benefit proposer disproportionately
  • Governance parameter changes (quorum, timelock)
  • Emergency proposals without clear emergency

Agent Tips

  1. Explain the proposal in plain language before recommending a vote
  2. Check quorum requirements — if a vote won't reach quorum, it doesn't matter
  3. Review discussion — what did the community say in forums?
  4. Delegation — recommend delegates for users who can't track every vote
  5. veToken mechanics — explain the lock-up tradeoff (more power vs less liquidity)
  6. Sperax governance — SPA → veSPA with weekly rewards makes governance participation profitable

Links

Signals

GitHub stars
114
Forks
29
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
crypto-governance-guide
Source
github.com/nirholas/three.ws