doe-designer
SkillMediaDesign of Experiments planning and analysis skill for factorial and response surface experiments.
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
Then ask your AI: use the doe-designer skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by a5c-ai/babysitter in library/specializations/domains/science/industrial-engineering/skills/doe-designer/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
You are doe-designer - a specialized skill for designing, executing, and analyzing designed experiments for process optimization.
Overview
This skill enables AI-powered DOE including:
- Full factorial design generation
- Fractional factorial design with confounding analysis
- Response surface methodology (CCD, Box-Behnken)
- Screening design (Plackett-Burman, definitive screening)
- ANOVA analysis of experimental results
- Main effects and interaction plots
- Contour plots and surface plots
- Optimal factor level determination
- Confirmation run planning
Capabilities
1. Full Factorial Design
import pyDOE2 as doe
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def full_factorial_design(factors, levels=2):
"""
Generate full factorial design
factors: dict of {name: (low, high)} for 2-level
or {name: [level1, level2, ...]} for multi-level
"""
factor_names = list(factors.keys())
n_factors = len(factors)
if levels == 2:
# 2^k design
design_coded = doe.ff2n(n_factors)
n_runs = 2 ** n_factors
# Convert to actual values
design_actual = np.zeros_like(design_coded)
for i, (name, bounds) in enumerate(factors.items()):
low, high = bounds
design_actual[:, i] = np.where(design_coded[:, i] == -1, low, high)
else:
# General full factorial
level_counts = [levels] * n_factors
design_coded = doe.fullfact(level_counts)
n_runs = levels ** n_factors
design_actual = np.zeros_like(design_coded)
for i, (name, levels_list) in enumerate(factors.items()):
for j, level in enumerate(levels_list):
design_actual[design_coded[:, i] == j, i] = level
df = pd.DataFrame(design_actual, columns=factor_names)
df['Run'] = range(1, n_runs + 1)
df['StdOrder'] = df['Run']
# Randomize
df['RunOrder'] = np.random.permutation(n_runs) + 1
df = df.sort_values('RunOrder').reset_index(drop=True)
return {
"design_matrix": df,
"coded_matrix": design_coded,
"num_runs": n_runs,
"num_factors": n_factors,
"design_type": f"{levels}^{n_factors} Full Factorial",
"resolution": "Full"
}
2. Fractional Factorial Design
def fractional_factorial_design(factors, resolution='IV'):
"""
Generate fractional factorial design
resolution: 'III', 'IV', or 'V'
"""
n_factors = len(factors)
factor_names = list(factors.keys())
# Common fractional factorial generators
generators = {
3: {'III': 'a b ab'}, # 2^(3-1)
4: {'IV': 'a b c abc'}, # 2^(4-1)
5: {'V': 'a b c d abcd', 'III': 'a b ab c ac'}, # 2^(5-1) or 2^(5-2)
6: {'IV': 'a b c d ab cd', 'III': 'a b ab c ac bc'},
7: {'IV': 'a b c d ab ac bc', 'III': 'a b ab c ac d ad'}
}
if n_factors in generators and resolution in generators[n_factors]:
gen = generators[n_factors][resolution]
design_coded = doe.fracfact(gen)
else:
# Default to resolution IV if available
design_coded = doe.fracfact(' '.join(['abcdefghij'[:n_factors]]))
n_runs = len(design_coded)
# Convert to actual values
design_actual = np.zeros_like(design_coded)
for i, (name, bounds) in enumerate(factors.items()):
low, high = bounds
design_actual[:, i] = np.where(design_coded[:, i] == -1, low, high)
df = pd.DataFrame(design_actual, columns=factor_names)
# Analyze confounding
confounding = analyze_confounding(n_factors, resolution)
return {
"design_matrix": df,
"num_runs": n_runs,
"resolution": resolution,
"confounding_pattern": confounding,
"design_type": f"2^({n_factors}-p) Resolution {resolution}"
}
def analyze_confounding(n_factors, resolution):
"""Describe confounding pattern by resolution"""
patterns = {
'III': "Main effects confounded with 2-factor interactions",
'IV': "Main effects clear; 2FIs confounded with each other",
'V': "Main effects and 2FIs clear; 3FIs confounded"
}
return patterns.get(resolution, "Unknown confounding pattern")
3. Response Surface Designs
def central_composite_design(factors, alpha='rotatable', center_points=5):
"""
Generate Central Composite Design (CCD)
alpha: 'rotatable', 'orthogonal', or numeric value
"""
n_factors = len(factors)
factor_names = list(factors.keys())
# Generate CCD
design_coded = doe.ccdesign(n_factors, center=(0, center_points), alpha=alpha)
n_runs = len(design_coded)
# Convert to actual values
design_actual = np.zeros_like(design_coded)
for i, (name, bounds) in enumerate(factors.items()):
low, high = bounds
center = (low + high) / 2
half_range = (high - low) / 2
design_actual[:, i] = center + design_coded[:, i] * half_range
df = pd.DataFrame(design_actual, columns=factor_names)
return {
"design_matrix": df,
"coded_matrix": design_coded,
"num_runs": n_runs,
"design_type": "Central Composite Design",
"alpha": alpha,
"center_points": center_points
}
def box_behnken_design(factors, center_points=3):
"""
Generate Box-Behnken Design
Good for 3-4 factors, avoids extreme corners
"""
n_factors = len(factors)
factor_names = list(factors.keys())
design_coded = doe.bbdesign(n_factors, center=center_points)
n_runs = len(design_coded)
# Convert to actual values
design_actual = np.zeros_like(design_coded)
for i, (name, bounds) in enumerate(factors.items()):
low, high = bounds
center = (low + high) / 2
half_range = (high - low) / 2
design_actual[:, i] = center + design_coded[:, i] * half_range
df = pd.DataFrame(design_actual, columns=factor_names)
return {
"design_matrix": df,
"num_runs": n_runs,
"design_type": "Box-Behnken Design",
"center_points": center_points,
"advantage": "No corner points - avoids extreme conditions"
}
4. ANOVA Analysis
import statsmodels.api as sm
from statsmodels.formula.api import ols
def analyze_factorial_experiment(data, response_col, factor_cols):
"""
Perform ANOVA on factorial experiment
"""
# Build formula with main effects and interactions
main_effects = ' + '.join(factor_cols)
interactions = ' + '.join([f'{a}:{b}' for i, a in enumerate(factor_cols)
for b in factor_cols[i+1:]])
formula = f'{response_col} ~ {main_effects} + {interactions}'
model = ols(formula, data=data).fit()
anova_table = sm.stats.anova_lm(model, typ=2)
# Effect estimates
effects = {}
for factor in factor_cols:
high_mean = data[data[factor] == data[factor].max()][response_col].mean()
low_mean = data[data[factor] == data[factor].min()][response_col].mean()
effects[factor] = high_mean - low_mean
return {
"anova_table": anova_table.to_dict(),
"r_squared": model.rsquared,
"adj_r_squared": model.rsquared_adj,
"effects": effects,
"significant_factors": [f for f in factor_cols
if anova_table.loc[f, 'PR(>F)'] < 0.05],
"model_summary": model.summary().as_text()
}
5. Response Surface Analysis
def fit_response_surface(data, response_col, factor_cols):
"""
Fit second-order response surface model
"""
# Build quadratic formula
linear = ' + '.join(factor_cols)
quadratic = ' + '.join([f'I({f}**2)' for f in factor_cols])
interactions = ' + '.join([f'{a}:{b}' for i, a in enumerate(factor_cols)
for b in factor_cols[i+1:]])
formula = f'{response_col} ~ {linear} + {quadratic} + {interactions}'
model = ols(formula, data=data).fit()
# Find stationary point
# Extract coefficients for optimization
coeffs = model.params
return {
"model": model,
"r_squared": model.rsquared,
"coefficients": coeffs.to_dict(),
"significant_terms": [t for t in model.pvalues.index
if model.pvalues[t] < 0.05],
"formula": formula
}
def find_optimal_conditions(model, factor_cols, bounds, maximize=True):
"""
Find optimal factor settings using response surface
"""
from scipy.optimize import minimize
def predict(x):
data = pd.DataFrame([dict(zip(factor_cols, x))])
pred = model.predict(data)[0]
return -pred if maximize else pred
# Multiple starts for global optimization
best_result = None
for _ in range(20):
x0 = [np.random.uniform(b[0], b[1]) for b in bounds]
result = minimize(predict, x0, bounds=bounds, method='L-BFGS-B')
if best_result is None or result.fun < best_result.fun:
best_result = result
optimal = dict(zip(factor_cols, best_result.x))
optimal_response = -best_result.fun if maximize else best_result.fun
return {
"optimal_settings": optimal,
"predicted_response": optimal_response,
"optimization_success": best_result.success
}
6. Confirmation Run Planning
def plan_confirmation_runs(optimal_settings, model, n_runs=5, alpha=0.05):
"""
Plan confirmation runs at optimal settings
"""
from scipy import stats
# Predict at optimal
data = pd.DataFrame([optimal_settings])
predicted = model.predict(data)[0]
# Prediction interval
pred_se = np.sqrt(model.mse_resid) # Simplified
t_val = stats.t.ppf(1 - alpha/2, model.df_resid)
pi_lower = predicted - t_val * pred_se * np.sqrt(1 + 1/len(model.model.data.orig_endog))
pi_upper = predicted + t_val * pred_se * np.sqrt(1 + 1/len(model.model.data.orig_endog))
return {
"optimal_settings": optimal_settings,
"predicted_response": predicted,
"prediction_interval": {
"lower": pi_lower,
"upper": pi_upper,
"confidence": 1 - alpha
},
"confirmation_runs": n_runs,
"acceptance_criterion": f"Mean of {n_runs} runs should fall within [{pi_lower:.3f}, {pi_upper:.3f}]"
}
Process Integration
This skill integrates with the following processes:
design-of-experiments-execution.jsroot-cause-analysis-investigation.jsstatistical-process-control-implementation.js
Output Format
{
"design_type": "2^4 Full Factorial",
"factors": ["Temperature", "Pressure", "Time", "Catalyst"],
"num_runs": 16,
"analysis": {
"significant_factors": ["Temperature", "Pressure"],
"significant_interactions": ["Temperature:Pressure"],
"r_squared": 0.94
},
"optimal_settings": {
"Temperature": 180,
"Pressure": 2.5,
"Time": 60,
"Catalyst": 0.5
},
"predicted_response": 95.3,
"confirmation_plan": {
"runs": 5,
"prediction_interval": [93.1, 97.5]
}
}
Best Practices
- Start with screening - Use Plackett-Burman for many factors
- Choose appropriate resolution - Resolution IV minimum for main effects
- Include center points - Detect curvature
- Randomize run order - Reduce systematic bias
- Replicate - Estimate error for significance testing
- Confirm results - Always run confirmation experiments
Constraints
- Document all experimental conditions
- Control nuisance factors
- Follow design exactly as planned
- Report both practical and statistical significance
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 2k
- Forks
- 112
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
doe-designer- Source
- github.com/a5c-ai/babysitter
Related picks
Skill · thedaviddias
The pick for JavaScriptmodern-javascript-patterns
Skill · wshobson
The pick for JavaScriptpython-performance-optimization
Skill · wshobson
The pick for Pythonpython-pro
Skill · jeffallan
The pick for Pythonrseng-notebooks
Skill · fdiblen
The pick for Notebooksexecute
Skill · brycewang-stanford
The pick for Notebooks