The Economist Style Guide

SkillDocs & knowledge

Apply The Economist style guide to written content. Use when editing markdown, HTML, documentation, or any written text that needs professional editing for clarity, precision, and brevity. Detects weasel words, fillers, passive voice, and style issues.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the The Economist Style Guide skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by tajd/economist-style-guide-plugin in economist-style/skills/economist-style/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Apply these principles to all written content, including markdown files, HTML, code documentation, and technical writing.

Core Principles

  1. Clarity first: Use short words, active voice, and concrete examples
  2. Precision: Replace vague quantifiers with specific numbers and facts
  3. Brevity: Choose concise over verbose expressions
  4. Dialect awareness: Match the document's existing spelling and conventions (British, American, etc.)

Orwell's Six Elementary Rules

The guide's introduction rests on George Orwell's six rules (from "Politics and the English Language", 1946): clarity of thought first, then say it as simply as possible.

  1. Never use a metaphor, simile or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print
  2. Never use a long word where a short one will do
  3. If it is possible to cut out a word, always cut it out
  4. Never use the passive where you can use the active
  5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent
  6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous

Tone: The "Do Nots"

In the spirit of the guide's introduction:

  • Do not be stuffy: Use everyday speech, not the language of lawyers or bureaucrats
  • Do not be hectoring or arrogant: Those who disagree are not necessarily stupid; persuade with evidence, not assertion
  • Do not be too pleased with yourself: Let analysis speak; avoid self-congratulation
  • Do not be too chatty: Maintain professional distance
  • Do not be too didactic: Guide, don't lecture
  • Get straight in and be lucid: No throat-clearing openings; edit ruthlessly; cut anything superfluous

Analysis Workflow

When reviewing text, follow this sequence:

0. Load the Signature Rules

Read reference/ECONOMIST-SIGNATURE.md first — a one-page distillation of the rules that make copy recognizably Economist (numbers, dates, commas, quotes, honorifics, headings). Most reviews need only this plus the quick checks below; load the detailed files only when a deeper check is warranted.

1. Detect Document Dialect

IMPORTANT: Before making any suggestions, detect the document's existing spelling dialect:

  • Look for spellings like "colour" vs "color", "organise" vs "organize"
  • Check date formats (1st January vs January 1st)
  • Observe punctuation style (single vs double quotes)
  • Match the document's existing conventions - do not impose a dialect

2. Structural Review

  • Check for buried ledes (main point should come first)
  • Verify logical flow and argument structure
  • Ensure each paragraph has a clear purpose

3. Clarity Analysis

For detailed passive voice and clarity rules, read reference/CLARITY.md

Quick checks:

  • Flag passive voice constructions
  • Identify jargon and suggest plain alternatives
  • Find unnecessarily complex words
  • Detect hedge words that weaken statements

4. Precision Check

For detailed precision rules, read reference/PRECISION.md

Quick checks:

  • Identify vague quantifiers ("many", "often", "significant")
  • Flag weasel words and empty fillers
  • Flag clichés and dead metaphors ("game-changer", "perfect storm")
  • Suggest specific numbers or evidence
  • Remove redundant phrases

5. Dialect Conventions (if applicable)

Only if the user explicitly requests dialect checking, or if there are inconsistencies within the document, read reference/DIALECT-CONVENTIONS.md

6. Common Errors

For frequently encountered mistakes, read reference/COMMON-ERRORS.md

7. Punctuation Check

For detailed punctuation rules (commas, semicolons, dashes, quotation marks), read reference/PUNCTUATION.md

Quick checks:

  • Verify comma usage (serial comma, restrictive clauses)
  • Check dash and hyphen usage
  • Ensure consistent quotation mark style

8. Numbers and Figures

For number formatting guidelines, read reference/NUMBERS.md

Quick checks:

  • Spell out numbers one to ten, use numerals from 11
  • Verify percentage formatting (% symbol, percentage points vs percentages)
  • Check date and currency formatting

9. Structure Review

For document organisation guidelines, read reference/STRUCTURE.md

Quick checks:

  • Each paragraph has a clear topic sentence
  • Lead/opening hooks the reader
  • Logical flow from paragraph to paragraph
  • Conclusion adds value (not just summary)

10. Tone Assessment

For voice and register guidance, read reference/TONE.md

Quick checks:

  • Authoritative but not arrogant
  • Avoid excessive adjectives and intensifiers
  • Neutral language on contested issues
  • No preaching or lecturing
  • People: full name on first mention, honorific + surname after ("Ms Yellen")

11. Abbreviations (on-demand)

If the document contains abbreviations or acronyms, read reference/ABBREVIATIONS.md

12. Capitalisation (on-demand)

If there are capitalisation questions (titles, institutions, geographic terms), read reference/CAPITALIZATION.md

13. Special Contexts (on-demand)

For quotations, foreign words, lists, or tables, read reference/SPECIAL-CONTEXTS.md

14. Word Usage (on-demand)

For rulings on commonly misused words (aggravate, decimate, refute, unique...), read reference/WORDS.md

Output Format

When providing feedback:

  1. List issues by category (clarity, precision, dialect consistency if applicable)
  2. Provide line/paragraph references
  3. Show original text and suggested replacement
  4. Explain the reasoning briefly

Example:

**Clarity Issue** (Para 2, Line 3)
Original: "The data was analysed by the research team"
Suggested: "The research team analysed the data"
Reason: Active voice is clearer and more direct

When Not to Apply

  • Direct quotations (preserve original wording)
  • Code examples (unless in comments/documentation)
  • Technical terms with no plain alternative
  • Proper nouns and brand names
  • Established dialect/spelling patterns (match what's already there)

Signals

GitHub stars
118
Forks
4
Last commit
Aug 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
economist-style
Source
github.com/tajd/economist-style-guide-plugin