fable-evidence-done — never claim it works without evidence it works
SkillFiles & storageBefore you say "done", "fixed", "works", "passing", or "verified", ground that claim in a real command/test/file/tool result on the same line — or say plainly that it is not verified yet. Use whenever you are about to report completion or success of a code change, a build, a fix, or a task. Catches unsupported "it works" claims. Pulled on demand; not always-on.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the fable-evidence-done — never claim it works without evidence it works skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by elon-choo/fablever in .agents/skills/fable-evidence-done/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Decisiveness has an honest cost. The style-only ablation showed the Fable working style raised unsupported
"it works" claims to 8.3% vs plain Claude's 2.1% (eval/style-only-ablation/) — the trade for being
outcome-first. fablever mitigates this in the tool with fable_lint's unsupported-done-claim rule
(label regression: 100% on the fixture set, eval/unsupported-claim-regression/). This skill is the
behavior that rule guards: a completion claim must carry its evidence.
When to use this
- You are about to write "done / fixed / works / passing / verified / resolved / ready" (or the same in another language) about a code change, build, fix, migration, or task.
When NOT to use this
- You are describing a plan or an intention, not asserting a result.
- A pure-conversation answer with no executed work to verify.
The rule
Every completion claim names its evidence on the same line, or it is downgraded to "not verified".
- "Fixed. It works now." → not allowed (no evidence).
- "Fixed —
npm testpasses (42/42)." → allowed (names the check). - "Implemented, but not verified yet — haven't run the suite." → allowed (honest, no false claim).
- "고쳤고 작동합니다." → not allowed. "고쳤습니다.
npm test로 확인했습니다." → allowed.
Procedure
- Before claiming completion, find the evidence. Run the test, check the exit code, read the file, diff against the spec, hit the endpoint — a check that could actually fail.
- Cite it inline. Put the command/result next to the claim ("done —
<cmd>→<result>"). - If you have not verified, say so. "Implemented but not verified" is a complete, honest report; a bare "it works" is not. Do not run the verification only in your head.
- Skip the ceremony on trivial one-liners — a typo fix does not need a test harness, but also does not need a triumphant "works!".
Expected output
Completion claims that each carry an inline, checkable piece of evidence — or an explicit "not verified".
Verification
Re-scan your final message for "done/works/fixed/verified". For each, is there a command/test/file/tool result on that line? If not, either run the check now or downgrade the wording.
Failure cases
- "All green, ship it" with no test actually run (tone-only completion claim).
- Saying "verified" when the verification happened only in reasoning, not as a tool result.
- Reporting a passing test you did not run this session.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 33
- Forks
- 8
- Last commit
- Jul 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
fable-evidence-done- Source
- github.com/elon-choo/fablever