Finishing a Development Branch

SkillDev tools

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Finishing a Development Branch skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor in skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Overview

Guide completion of development work by verifying quality and completing the branch workflow.

Core principle: Behavior depends on conductor/config.json"mode":

  • "agentic": Auto-push branch and create PR — no user input needed.
  • "human-in-the-loop": Present 4 structured options and execute the user's choice.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Before presenting options, verify tests pass:

# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...

If tests fail:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.

Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Determine Base Branch

# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null

Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"

Step 3: Complete Branch (Mode-Dependent)

"agentic" mode — Auto-Complete

Do NOT ask the user which option to choose. Proceed automatically:

  1. Push the branch to remote with -u flag
  2. Create a Pull Request using the track's spec and plan as PR description
  3. Report the PR URL to the user

Then go to Step 5 (Cleanup Worktree).

"human-in-the-loop" mode — Present Options

Present exactly these 4 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work

Which option?

Don't add explanation - keep options concise.

Step 4: Execute Choice (Human-in-the-loop mode only)

Option 1: Merge Locally
# Switch to base branch
git checkout <base-branch>

# Pull latest
git pull

# Merge feature branch
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 2: Push and Create PR
# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>

# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>

## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."

Don't cleanup worktree.

Option 4: Discard

Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for exact confirmation.

If confirmed:

git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Step 5: Cleanup Worktree

For Options 1, 2, 4:

Check if in worktree:

git worktree list | grep_search $(git branch --show-current)

If yes:

git worktree remove <worktree-path>

For Option 3: Keep worktree.

Quick Reference

ModeBehavior
"agentic"Auto-push + create PR, no user input
"human-in-the-loop"Present 4 options, execute user's choice

Human-in-the-loop Option Summary

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locally--
2. Create PR--
3. Keep as-is---
4. Discard---✓ (force)

Common Mistakes

Skipping test verification

  • Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
  • Fix: Always verify tests before proceeding

Open-ended questions (human-in-the-loop mode)

  • Problem: "What should I do next?" → ambiguous
  • Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options

Auto-completing without checking mode

  • Problem: Pushing/creating PRs when user expects to choose
  • Fix: Read conductor/config.json"mode" before Step 3

Automatic worktree cleanup

  • Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
  • Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

No confirmation for discard

  • Problem: Accidentally delete work
  • Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation

Red Flags

Never:

  • Proceed with failing tests
  • Merge without verifying tests on result
  • Delete work without confirmation
  • Force-push without explicit request

Always:

  • Verify tests before completing
  • In "human-in-the-loop" mode: present exactly 4 options and get typed confirmation for Option 4
  • In "agentic" mode: auto-push and create PR, report URL to user
  • Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only (human-in-the-loop) or after auto-push (agentic)

Integration

Called by:

  • subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
  • executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete

Pairs with:

  • using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill

Signals

GitHub stars
377
Forks
38
Last commit
Apr 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
finishing-a-development-branch-ibrahim-3d
Source
github.com/ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor