Vulnetix Fix Intelligence Skill

SkillSecurity

Get fix intelligence for a vulnerability and propose concrete remediation for the current repository

Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.

Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.

Then ask your AI: use the Vulnetix Fix Intelligence Skill skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by davepoon/buildwithclaude in plugins/vulnetix/skills/fix/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

This skill fetches fix intelligence for a vulnerability and proposes concrete, actionable remediation steps for the current repository.

Output & Analysis Guidelines

Primary output format: Markdown. All reports, tables, fix options, version diffs, and verification summaries MUST be presented as formatted markdown text directly — never generate scripts or programs to produce output that can be expressed as markdown.

Visual data — use Mermaid diagrams to display data visually when it aids comprehension. Mermaid renders natively in markdown and requires no external tools. Use it for:

  • Dependency upgrade paths → graph LR showing current → target version with breaking change annotations
  • Fix option comparison → quadrantChart plotting Safe Harbour confidence vs. version change magnitude
  • Dependency tree showing vulnerable path → graph TD (root → parent → vulnerable dep)
  • Post-fix verification status → flowchart (scan → tests → result)

Example — upgrade path:

```mermaid
graph LR
    A[log4j-core 2.14.1] -->|patch| B[2.14.2]
    A -->|minor| C[2.17.1 ✓ fix]
    A -->|major| D[3.0.0]
    style A fill:#f66,stroke:#333
    style C fill:#6f6,stroke:#333
```

If uv is available, richer visualizations can be generated with Python (matplotlib, plotly) and saved to .vulnetix/:

command -v uv &>/dev/null && uv run --with matplotlib python3 -c '
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# ... generate chart ...
plt.savefig(".vulnetix/chart.png", dpi=150, bbox_inches="tight")
'

When Python charts are generated, display them inline and keep the Mermaid version as a text fallback.

Data processing — tooling cascade (strict order):

  1. jq / yq + bash builtins (preferred) — jq for JSON (API responses, CycloneDX SBOMs, package manager output), yq for YAML (memory file). Pipe to head, tail, cut, sed, grep, sort, uniq, wc for shaping.
  2. uv (for complex analysis or charts) — If dependency graph analysis, version comparison logic, or visualization beyond Mermaid are needed, check uv first:
    command -v uv &>/dev/null && uv run --with pandas,matplotlib python3 -c '...'
    
  3. python3 stdlib (last resort) — Only if uv is unavailable. Use json, csv, collections, statistics modules — no pip dependencies:
    command -v python3 &>/dev/null && python3 -c 'import json, sys; ...'
    

Never assume any runtime is available — always check with command -v before use. If all programmatic tools are unavailable, analyze manually with the Read tool and present results as markdown with Mermaid diagrams.

Package manager commands (npm install --dry-run, pip show, go mod tidy, cargo check, etc.) are exempt — they are executed directly as part of the fix workflow, not for data analysis.

Mandatory Reporting Requirements

Every output and report from this skill MUST include the following version and provenance information for each affected package:

Package Version Reporting

All reports MUST display:

FieldDescriptionRequired
Current VersionThe version currently installed/resolvedAlways
Version SourceHow the version was determined (see below)Always
Fix Target VersionThe patched version to upgrade toWhen available
Fix SourceRegistry, distro patch, or source commit hashAlways
Safe Harbour ConfidenceConfidence score 0.00–1.00 (see below)Always

Version Source Transparency

You MUST be transparent about how the current version was determined. Report one of:

  • User-supplied — the user provided the version directly
  • Manifest — read from a package manager manifest file (state which file)
  • Lockfile — read from a lockfile (state which file)
  • Installed — derived from the installed package on the filesystem:
    • npm/node: read node_modules/<pkg>/package.json (search parent directories too)
    • Python: run pip show <pkg> or read site-packages/<pkg>/METADATA
    • Go: read go.sum or run go list -m <pkg>
    • Rust: read Cargo.lock or run cargo metadata
    • System binaries: run <binary> --version or check PATH resolution
    • Ruby: run gem list <pkg> or read Gemfile.lock
    • Maven: read effective POM or local .m2 cache
  • Context — the version was already present in conversation context
  • Unknown — version could not be determined (explain why)

If the user does not supply the version and it is not in conversation context, you MUST attempt to derive it from the filesystem before reporting "Unknown". Search outside the current working directory if needed — check parent directories, global package manager directories, and gitignored directories (e.g., node_modules/, vendor/, .venv/, target/, __pycache__/).

Safe Harbour Confidence Score

Express the Safe Harbour score as a decimal between 0.00 and 1.00 where 1.00 = 100% confidence the fix resolves the vulnerability without introducing regressions or breaking changes.

Confidence tiers:

  • High confidence (> 0.90): Patch-level bump in the same minor version, official registry release, well-tested fix, minimal API surface change
  • Reasonable confidence (0.35–0.90): Minor version bump, distro-repackaged patch, source fix from upstream with commit hash, some API changes but backward-compatible
  • Low confidence (< 0.35): Major version bump, unofficial patch, cherry-picked commit from development branch, significant API changes, no upstream release yet

What factors adjust confidence:

  • Registry-published release with changelog: +0.15
  • Distro-maintained patch (e.g., Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL): +0.10
  • Upstream commit hash verified in release tag: +0.10
  • CISA KEV listed (validated exploitation): +0.05 (urgency signal, not fix quality)
  • Major version jump: −0.25
  • No test suite in project to validate: −0.15
  • Transitive dependency (indirect control): −0.10
  • Built from source with untagged commit: −0.20

Report format for each affected package:

Package: <name>
Current Version: <version> (source: <version-source>)
Fix Target: <version> (source: <registry|distro <name> <version>|commit <hash>>)
Safe Harbour: <score> (<High|Reasonable|Low> confidence)

Vulnerability Memory File (.vulnetix/memory.yaml)

This skill maintains a .vulnetix/memory.yaml file in the repository root that tracks all vulnerability encounters, decisions, and fix outcomes across sessions. You MUST read this file at the start of every invocation and update it after every action.

Schema

# .vulnetix/memory.yaml
# Auto-maintained by Vulnetix Claude Code Plugin
# Do not remove — tracks vulnerability decisions, manifest scans, and fix history

schema_version: 1
manifests:                                # Tracked manifest files and SBOM scan history
  package.json:
    path: "package.json"                  # Relative path from repo root
    ecosystem: npm
    last_scanned: "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"  # ISO 8601 UTC
    sbom_generated: true
    sbom_path: ".vulnetix/scans/package.json.20240115T103000Z.cdx.json"
    vuln_count: 3                         # Vulnerabilities found in last scan
    scan_source: hook                     # hook | fix | exploits | package-search
  services--api--go.mod:
    path: "services/api/go.mod"           # Supports monorepo paths (key uses -- separator)
    ecosystem: go
    last_scanned: "2024-01-15T10:31:00Z"
    sbom_generated: true
    sbom_path: ".vulnetix/scans/services--api--go.mod.20240115T103100Z.cdx.json"
    vuln_count: 0
    scan_source: hook
vulnerabilities:
  CVE-2021-44228:                       # Primary vuln ID (key)
    aliases:                             # Other IDs for the same vuln
      - GHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q
    package: log4j-core
    ecosystem: maven
    discovery:
      date: "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"      # ISO 8601 UTC
      source: manifest                   # manifest | lockfile | sbom | scan | user | hook
      file: pom.xml                      # The manifest where it was found
      sbom: .vulnetix/scans/pom.xml.cdx.json  # CycloneDX v1.7 SBOM (when produced by scan/hook)
    versions:
      current: "2.14.1"
      current_source: "lockfile: pom.xml"
      fixed_in: "2.17.1"
      fix_source: "registry: Maven Central"
    severity: critical                   # critical | high | medium | low | unknown
    safe_harbour: 0.82                   # 0.00–1.00 confidence score
    status: fixed                        # See VEX Status Mapping below
    justification: null                  # See VEX Justification Mapping below
    action_response: null                # See VEX Action Response Mapping below
    threat_model:                        # Populated by /vulnetix:exploits
      techniques: [T1190, T1059]         # MITRE ATT&CK IDs (internal only)
      tactics:                           # Developer-friendly descriptions (shown to user)
        - "Attackable from the internet"
        - "Can run arbitrary commands"
      attack_vector: network             # network | local | adjacent | physical
      attack_complexity: low             # low | high
      privileges_required: none          # none | low | high
      user_interaction: none             # none | required
      reachability: direct               # direct | transitive | not-found | unknown
      exposure: public-facing            # public-facing | internal | local-only | unknown
    cwss:                                # CWSS-derived priority (populated by /vulnetix:exploits)
      score: 87.5                        # 0-100 composite priority score
      priority: P1                       # P1 | P2 | P3 | P4
      factors:
        technical_impact: 100            # 0-100
        exploitability: 95               # 0-100
        exposure: 100                    # 0-100
        complexity: 90                   # 0-100
        repo_relevance: 70               # 0-100
    pocs:                                # PoC sources (from /vulnetix:exploits, never executed)
      - url: "https://exploit-db.com/exploits/12345"
        source: exploitdb
        type: poc
        local_path: ".vulnetix/pocs/CVE-2021-44228/exploit_12345.py"
        fetched_date: "2024-01-15T10:35:00Z"
        verified: true
        analysis: "RCE via JNDI lookup, network vector, no auth"
    dependabot:                          # Populated from GitHub Dependabot via gh CLI
      alert_number: 42                   # Dependabot alert number on this repo
      alert_state: fixed                 # open | dismissed | fixed | auto_dismissed
      alert_url: "https://github.com/owner/repo/security/dependabot/42"
      dismiss_reason: null               # fix_started | inaccurate | no_bandwidth | not_used | tolerable_risk | null
      dismiss_comment: null              # Dismisser's comment, if any
      pr_number: 187                     # Associated Dependabot PR number, or null
      pr_state: merged                   # open | closed | merged | null
      pr_url: "https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/187"
      pr_latest_comment: "LGTM, merging" # Last comment on the PR (for context)
      last_checked: "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
    code_scanning:                       # Populated from GitHub CodeQL / code scanning via gh CLI
      alerts:                            # CodeQL alerts correlated to this vuln (matched by CWE)
        - alert_number: 15
          state: dismissed               # open | dismissed | fixed
          rule_id: "java/log4j-injection"
          rule_name: "Log4j injection"
          severity: critical             # critical | high | medium | low | warning | note | error
          dismissed_reason: null         # "false positive" | "won't fix" | "used in tests" | null
          dismissed_comment: null        # Free-text justification (max 280 chars)
          dismissed_by: "octocat"        # GitHub username
          file_path: "src/main/java/App.java"
          start_line: 42
          url: "https://github.com/owner/repo/security/code-scanning/15"
      tool: CodeQL                       # CodeQL | semgrep | etc.
      tool_version: "2.15.0"
      last_checked: "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
    secret_scanning:                     # Populated from GitHub secret scanning via gh CLI
      alerts:                            # Secret scanning alerts correlated to this vuln's package/context
        - alert_number: 7
          state: resolved                # open | resolved
          secret_type: "github_personal_access_token"
          secret_type_display: "GitHub Personal Access Token"
          resolution: revoked            # false_positive | wont_fix | revoked | used_in_tests | null
          resolution_comment: "Token rotated and old one revoked"
          resolved_by: "octocat"
          validity: inactive             # active | inactive | unknown
          file_path: "config/settings.py"
          url: "https://github.com/owner/repo/security/secret-scanning/7"
          push_protection_bypassed: false
      last_checked: "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
    decision:
      choice: fix-applied                # See User Decision Values below
      reason: "Upgraded to 2.17.1 via version bump"
      date: "2024-01-15T11:00:00Z"
    history:                             # Append-only event log
      - date: "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
        event: discovered
        detail: "Found via /vulnetix:fix CVE-2021-44228"
      - date: "2024-01-15T11:00:00Z"
        event: fix-applied
        detail: "Version bumped log4j-core 2.14.1 → 2.17.1 in pom.xml"

VEX Status Mapping (Internal → Developer Language)

Use VEX semantics internally but always communicate to the user in developer-friendly language. Never use raw VEX terminology with the user.

VEX StatusDeveloper LanguageWhen to use
not_affectedNot affected — this vuln doesn't apply to your projectPackage not present, code path unreachable, or already mitigated
affectedVulnerable — your project is exposed, action neededPackage is present at a vulnerable version
fixedFixed — a fix has been appliedVersion bumped, patch applied, or dependency removed
under_investigationInvestigating — still evaluating the impactUser hasn't decided yet, or analysis is ongoing

VEX Justification Mapping (for not_affected status)

VEX JustificationDeveloper LanguageExample
component_not_presentPackage not in this projectManifest search found no match
vulnerable_code_not_reachableVulnerable code path not usedApp imports only safe submodules
vulnerable_code_cannot_be_controlled_by_adversaryNot exploitable in this deploymentInternal-only service, no untrusted input
inline_mitigations_already_existAlready mitigatedWAF rule, input validation, or config hardening in place

VEX Action Response Mapping (for affected status)

VEX ActionDeveloper LanguageWhen to use
will_not_fixRisk accepted — won't fix, documented reasonUser explicitly accepts the risk
will_fixFix planned — scheduled for laterUser wants to fix but not right now
updateUpdating — fix in progressActively applying a version bump or patch

User Decision Values

These are the decision.choice values recorded in the memory file, mapped from user feedback:

DecisionMaps to VEXTriggered by user saying
fix-appliedstatus: fixed"Yes, apply the fix" / fix was successfully applied
risk-acceptedstatus: affected, action: will_not_fix"We'll accept this risk" / "Won't fix"
not-affectedstatus: not_affected"This doesn't affect us" / "Not relevant"
investigatingstatus: under_investigation"Let me look into this" / "Need more info"
deferredstatus: affected, action: will_fix"We'll fix this later" / "Not now"
mitigatedstatus: not_affected, justification: inline_mitigations_already_exist"We have a workaround" / "Already handled"
inlinedstatus: fixedDependency was replaced with first-party code
risk-avoidedstatus: not_affected, justification: component_not_present"We removed the dependency" / "Feature disabled" / "Not deploying this"
risk-transferredstatus: not_affected, justification: vulnerable_code_cannot_be_controlled_by_adversary"Our WAF handles it" / "Platform mitigates this" / "Handled by infrastructure"

Dependabot Integration

When gh CLI is available, check GitHub Dependabot alerts and PRs for additional context. Dependabot state is a supplementary signal — it does not override user decisions recorded in the memory file, but it enriches context.

Checking gh CLI Availability
gh auth status 2>/dev/null

If this succeeds, the user has gh authenticated and you can query Dependabot. If it fails, skip Dependabot checks silently — do not prompt the user to authenticate.

Querying Dependabot Alerts
# Get the repo owner/name from git remote
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/dependabot/alerts --jq '[.[] | select(.security_advisory.cve_id == "'"$ARGUMENTS"'" or (.security_advisory.ghsa_id == "'"$ARGUMENTS"'") or (.security_advisory.identifiers[]? | select(.type == "CVE" and .value == "'"$ARGUMENTS"'") ) )] | first'

If the vuln ID is a GHSA, also match on .security_advisory.ghsa_id. If the vuln ID is a CVE, match on .security_advisory.cve_id and the identifiers array.

If no alert matches the exact vuln ID, also try aliases from the memory file entry.

Querying Dependabot PRs
# Find Dependabot PRs referencing this vulnerability or the affected package
gh pr list --author "app/dependabot" --state all --json number,title,state,url,comments --limit 50 | jq '[.[] | select(.title | test("'"$PACKAGE_NAME"'"; "i"))]'

For each matching PR, extract:

  • PR number, state (open/closed/merged), URL
  • The latest comment (last item in .comments[]): gh pr view <number> --json comments --jq '.comments[-1].body'
Dependabot Alert State → VEX Mapping

Map Dependabot states to VEX status and user decision values. Always communicate to the user in developer-friendly language.

Dependabot Alert StateDismiss ReasonVEX StatusDecision ChoiceDeveloper Language
open—under_investigationinvestigating"Dependabot flagged this — still open, no action taken yet"
dismissedfix_startedaffecteddeferred"Dependabot dismissed — team started a fix"
dismissedinaccuratenot_affectednot-affected"Dependabot dismissed — team determined this is inaccurate"
dismissedno_bandwidthaffecteddeferred"Dependabot dismissed — deferred, no bandwidth"
dismissednot_usednot_affectednot-affected"Dependabot dismissed — vulnerable code not used"
dismissedtolerable_riskaffectedrisk-accepted"Dependabot dismissed — risk accepted as tolerable"
fixed—fixedfix-applied"Dependabot reports this as fixed"
auto_dismissed—not_affectednot-affected"Dependabot auto-dismissed — no longer applicable"

When a Dependabot PR exists:

PR StateVEX InterpretationDeveloper Language
openaffected + will_fix"Dependabot PR #N is open — the team is working on this upgrade"
mergedfixed"Dependabot PR #N was merged — fix applied via Dependabot"
closed (not merged)Check latest PR comment for reason"Dependabot PR #N was closed without merging — "

For closed (not merged) PRs: Read the latest comment on the PR to derive the justification. Common patterns:

  • "superseded by ..." / "replaced by ..." → decision: deferred, reason: paraphrase the comment
  • "not needed" / "false positive" → decision: not-affected, reason: paraphrase the comment
  • "will handle manually" → decision: deferred, reason: "Team will handle manually"
  • "breaking changes" / "can't upgrade" → decision: deferred, reason: paraphrase the comment
  • No comments or unclear → decision: investigating, reason: "Dependabot PR closed without explanation"
When Dependabot and Memory File Disagree

If the memory file has a user decision but Dependabot shows a different state:

  • User decision takes precedence — it represents a deliberate human choice
  • Flag the discrepancy to the user: "Note: Dependabot shows this as , but you previously marked it as . The Dependabot state may be out of sync."
  • Update the dependabot section in the memory file to reflect current Dependabot state regardless — it's a factual record of what GitHub shows

Code Scanning (CodeQL) Integration

When gh CLI is available, query GitHub code scanning alerts for findings that correlate with the current vulnerability. CodeQL alerts are correlated by CWE match — if the vulnerability's CWE (from VDB data) matches a CodeQL rule's tags or the rule directly references the vulnerability.

Querying Code Scanning Alerts
# List all open code scanning alerts
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/code-scanning/alerts?state=open --jq '[.[] | select(.rule.tags[]? | test("cwe-"; "i"))]'

# Check for alerts matching a specific CWE (extracted from vuln context in Step 2)
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/code-scanning/alerts --jq '[.[] | select(.rule.tags[]? | test("CWE-<NUMBER>"; "i"))]'

# Also check dismissed and fixed alerts for prior decisions
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/code-scanning/alerts?state=dismissed --jq '[.[] | select(.rule.tags[]? | test("CWE-<NUMBER>"; "i"))]'
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/code-scanning/alerts?state=fixed --jq '[.[] | select(.rule.tags[]? | test("CWE-<NUMBER>"; "i"))]'

If the repository does not have code scanning enabled, these calls return 403 or 404 — skip silently.

Checking Default Setup Status
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/code-scanning/default-setup --jq '{state, languages, query_suite}'

If state is not-configured, note this to the user: "CodeQL is not enabled on this repository. Consider enabling it to catch similar issues in code."

Code Scanning Alert State → VEX Mapping
Code Scanning StateDismissed ReasonVEX StatusDecision ChoiceDeveloper Language
open—under_investigationinvestigating"CodeQL flagged this pattern — still open"
dismissedfalse positivenot_affectednot-affected"CodeQL alert dismissed — false positive"
dismissedwon't fixaffectedrisk-accepted"CodeQL alert dismissed — risk accepted"
dismissedused in testsnot_affectednot-affected"CodeQL alert dismissed — only in test code"
fixed—fixedfix-applied"CodeQL reports the code pattern is fixed"

Enriching vulnerability context with CodeQL findings:

When a CodeQL alert matches the vulnerability's CWE:

  • The most_recent_instance.location tells you exactly which file and line the vulnerable pattern appears — include this in the fix report
  • The rule.full_description provides CodeQL's analysis of the weakness — quote relevant parts
  • If multiple instances exist, list the affected files so the user knows everywhere the pattern occurs
  • If the alert is fixed, this is strong evidence the code-level vulnerability has been addressed (complements a dependency version bump)
  • Use dismissed_comment as the justification text when surfacing prior decisions
Autofix Integration (CodeQL AI Suggestions)

If a CodeQL alert has an autofix available, check its status:

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/code-scanning/alerts/{alert_number}/autofix --jq '{status}'

Shortened here. Read the whole file on GitHub.

Signals

GitHub stars
4k
Forks
543
Last commit
Sep 2026

ahel review

  • K1binfo
    installs-packages

Automated review, not a security audit. Ruleset v1+k2.

Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
fix-davepoon
Source
github.com/davepoon/buildwithclaude