VCS Operations Reference
SkillDev toolsUse this skill when performing VCS operations on GitLab or GitHub repositories — creating, updating, or closing issues and MRs, applying label taxonomy, running `glab`/`gh` CLI commands, or resolving project paths dynamically. Acts as the single source of truth for CLI command syntax and label conventions; consuming skills reference this rather than duplicating logic. Triggers: "create a GitLab issue", "list open MRs", "apply priority label", "how do I resolve the project ID", "what's the carryover issue template". <example>Context: session-end needs to file a carryover issue for an incomplete task. user: "/close" assistant: "Creating carryover issue via glab with the Carryover Template from gitlab-ops — labels: carryover, priority::high."</example>
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the VCS Operations Reference skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by kanevry/session-orchestrator in skills/gitlab-ops/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
VCS Auto-Detection
Detect which VCS platform the current repo uses and select the right CLI:
# Check git remote
REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null)
if echo "$REMOTE_URL" | grep -q "github.com"; then
VCS=github # use `gh`
else
VCS=gitlab # use `glab`
fi
Session Config overrides:
vcs: github|gitlab— force a specific platformgitlab-host: <host>— override auto-detected GitLab host (glab reads host from git remote by default)
How Other Skills Reference This
Directive: Consuming skills MUST NOT duplicate VCS auto-detection logic or CLI command syntax inline. This skill is the single source of truth for all VCS operations.
When a skill needs VCS operations, include this reference block in its instructions:
VCS Reference: Detect the VCS platform per the "VCS Auto-Detection" section of the gitlab-ops skill. Use CLI commands per the "Common CLI Commands" section. For GitLab API operations, see "Canonical Project Identity."
Canonical commands: All glab and gh command syntax — flags, output formats,
pagination options — is defined in the "Common CLI Commands" section below. Consuming
skills must reference that section rather than redefining commands. If a skill needs a
command variant not listed there, add it to this file first, then reference it.
What consuming skills should include:
- The reference block above (copy-paste it verbatim)
- Any skill-specific parameters they pass to commands (e.g., label names, issue templates)
- They should NOT include raw
glab/ghinvocations or detection snippets
Canonical Project Identity
GitLab REST endpoints accept a URL-encoded namespace/project path. Select the GitLab host and project path explicitly; never derive a numeric project ID from glab repo view, search projects?search=, or use :id placeholders. Those forms can resolve through the ambient working directory or a stale search result and target another project after a rename, fork, or scaffold.
Set the identity once per operation sequence and reuse the encoded identifier without encoding it again:
GITLAB_HOST="<selected GitLab hostname>"
GROUP_PATH="<selected group path>"
PROJECT_NAME="<selected project name>"
PROJECT_PATH="$GROUP_PATH/$PROJECT_NAME"
ENCODED_PROJECT_PATH="$(node -e 'process.stdout.write(encodeURIComponent(process.argv[1]))' "$PROJECT_PATH")"
For a link target in another project, use the same path-first shape instead of a numeric ID:
TARGET_PROJECT_PATH="<target namespace>/<target project>"
TARGET_ENCODED_PROJECT_PATH="$(node -e 'process.stdout.write(encodeURIComponent(process.argv[1]))' "$TARGET_PROJECT_PATH")"
Pass --hostname "$GITLAB_HOST" to every glab api call. The endpoint itself then pins the project, including directly after creating a repository when the current directory does not yet identify the new project.
GitHub continues to use an owner/repo slug; gh repo takes it positionally and rejects -R:
gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q '.nameWithOwner'
Canonical enumeration pattern
To enumerate ALL projects (or issues) in a group, a single page is never the whole result — paginate and guard against silent truncation:
# GitLab — paginate a group's projects, following x-next-page until empty
page=1
while [ -n "$page" ]; do
resp=$(glab api --hostname "$GITLAB_HOST" "groups/<group-id>/projects?simple=true&include_subgroups=true&per_page=100&page=$page" --include)
# parse the response body ($resp) for project ids/paths here, deduping by id.
# Then advance by reading the `x-next-page` response header — an empty value
# means this was the last page, so the loop exits (the guard above is what breaks).
page=$(printf '%s\n' "$resp" | awk -F': *' 'tolower($1)=="x-next-page"{sub(/\r/,"",$2); print $2}')
done
- Follow pagination via the
x-next-pageresponse header — loop until it comes back empty. A single-page read on a known-large group is a signal the loop stopped early, not proof the group is small. - Dedupe by project id — subgroup traversal can surface the same project more than once.
- Silent-zero guard:
membership=truecan return a misleadingly small subset (e.g. a host that only sees a handful of a group's dozens of projects). If the count looks suspiciously low relative to the known group size, retry WITHOUTmembership(rely oninclude_subgroups=truealone) before trusting the result. A zero/one-page result on a known-large group is a probable auth/pagination bug — treat it as a bug signal, never as ground truth that "the group is actually empty."
Label Taxonomy
Taxonomy convention — priority REVERSED to scoped :: (supersedes #727 for this one axis).
priority::<level>is canonical. #727's stated rationale was that "this repo mirrors to GitHub, which has no scoped-label semantics … while a migration would break every existing label reference and issue." Both halves were checked on 2026-07-25 and neither holds:- Issues are not mirrored at all.
aiat-poc-infra/docs/github-mirror-runbook.md:1,5describes a git push-mirror with GitHub as "read-only downstream"; the external team-organization auditdocs/gitlab-team-org-2026-06-21.md:45confirms there is no two-way GitLab issue sync. Nothing crosses the boundary that a label rename could break. - GitHub already uses the scoped form.
gh api "repos/AIAT-AIandBusinessgrowth/aiat-barrierefrei-engine/labels"returnspriority::high,priority::low,priority::med,priority::mediumacross 77 open issues, and zeropriority:high. Same pattern onaiat-doc-vlm. GitHub treats::as an ordinary string; it merely does not enforce mutual exclusion. - Volume agrees independently: 416
priority::against 249priority:and 7 bare at the time of the decision. Chasing the minority spelling would mean re-labelling the majority. Producers were migrated FIRST (this change); the label-data migration follows separately, because migrating data before producers means the divergence returns within a day.
- Issues are not mirrored at all.
area:/type:/status:/from:stay SINGLE-COLON — but NOT on #727's rationale, which is disproven above. They stay because nothing measured argues for flipping them, and because each axis is its own migration cost. Flipping them is a separate decision and is explicitly NOT made here. Note thatstatusin particular is the worst-disciplined axis on the instance (354 assignments, only 48 percent scoped, 5 genuine value conflicts), so any future flip there needs a conflict-resolution pass first.- Readers accept both spellings. Every consumer that MATCHES a label compares through
scripts/lib/label-scope.mjsnormalizeLabel(), which collapses::to:— so issues still carryingpriority:highkeep being counted until the data migration lands. Only WRITES are canonical.
Priority Labels
priority::critical— blocking production or userspriority::high— important, schedule this sprintpriority::medium— plan for next sprintpriority::low— backlog, nice-to-have
Status Labels
status:ready— defined, ready to pick upstatus:in-progress— actively being worked onstatus:review— MR/PR created, awaiting reviewstatus:blocked— waiting on external dependency
Area Labels
area:frontend|area:backend|area:databasearea:ai|area:security|area:testingarea:ci|area:infrastructure|area:compliancearea:skills|area:vcs|area:harness
Type Labels
bug|feature|enhancement|refactorchore|documentation|epic|discovery|carryover|broken-windowcarryover— auto-created for 2×SPIRAL or FAILED agent tasks; seescripts/lib/spiral-carryover.mjs.broken-window— knowingly-broken shipment, hard due-date, filed by session-end Phase 2.6 (#730/H5); seescripts/lib/spiral-carryover.mjs(createBrokenWindowIssue).
Provenance Labels
from:<agent>— SHOULD be applied to any issue/MR created by an automated agent (e.g.from:discovery,from:reconcile), so operators can filter agent-authored items from human-authored ones. Single-colon form, per the taxonomy convention above.
Issue Linking (blocks / is_blocked_by)
GitLab's native issue-link types blocks and is_blocked_by (glab api --silent --hostname "$GITLAB_HOST" -X POST "projects/${ENCODED_PROJECT_PATH}/issues/${ISSUE_IID}/links" -f target_project_id="$TARGET_ENCODED_PROJECT_PATH" -f target_issue_iid="$OTHER_ISSUE_IID" -f link_type="$LINK_TYPE") are a Premium/Ultimate license feature. Set LINK_TYPE to blocks or is_blocked_by; the target accepts an encoded project path, so no numeric project ID is needed. On a Free/Core-tier GitLab instance this call returns HTTP 403 — a license-gate signal, not an auth/permission failure. Do not retry with different credentials or escalate as an auth bug.
Fallback (non-Premium instances):
- Use
relates_toinstead —link_type=relates_tois available on every GitLab tier (no ordering semantics, just an unscoped relation). Same API shape, only thelink_typevalue changes:glab api --silent --hostname "$GITLAB_HOST" -X POST \ "projects/${ENCODED_PROJECT_PATH}/issues/${ISSUE_IID}/links" \ -f target_project_id="$TARGET_ENCODED_PROJECT_PATH" \ -f target_issue_iid="$OTHER_ISSUE_IID" \ -f link_type=relates_to - Document the blocking semantics in the issue body — since
relates_tocarries no ordering meaning, add an explicit ordering note to both issues, e.g.⚠ Ordering: erst #<blocker_iid>, dann dieses Issue — blocks-Link nicht verfügbar (non-Premium). - Recognize the 403 as a license signal, not an auth error — before assuming a token/scope problem, try
relates_toon the same project pair: ifrelates_tosucceeds whereblocks/is_blocked_by403s, the license gate — not authentication — is the cause.
GitHub has no native issue-blocking relation at all — the body-ordering-note fallback in step 2 above is the standing convention there too, regardless of license tier (see "GitHub (gh)" below).
Common CLI Commands
Directive — consult this only for a command NOT listed below; every example here already complies. Each repo-scoped glab/gh invocation carries -R <OWNER>/<REPO> (glab also accepts GROUP/SUBGROUP/REPO or a full remote URL — resolveRepoSpec() in scripts/lib/vcs-repo-spec.mjs produces the right spec per platform); without the flag the target is whatever the ambient cwd remote happens to be, which is the wrong project in a sibling worktree, an /autopilot child, or a fork. Exactly four exceptions, each probed against the binaries: glab api/gh api (no --repo exists — pin the host with --hostname from resolveRepoHost() instead), gh repo <*> (rejects -R; takes the repository positionally), a glab repo call that already names the repository positionally, and — conditionally, not subcommand-wide — gh pr checks|view|diff|ready|merge|comment, where -R is legal ONLY alongside the <number>|<url>|<branch> positional: gh pr checks -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <BRANCH> carries the flag, while a positional-less gh pr checks -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --watch exits 1 with argument required when using the --repo flag — so name the PR or drop the flag, and never derive this from --help, which lists -R under INHERITED FLAGS with no such qualifier.
GitLab (glab)
# Issues
glab issue list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --per-page 50 # All open issues
glab issue list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --label "status:ready" --per-page 10 # Ready to work on
glab issue list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --label "priority::high" --per-page 10 # High priority
glab issue list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --closed --per-page 10 # Recently closed
glab issue view -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <IID> # View issue details
glab issue view -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <IID> --comments # With comments
glab issue create -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --title "title" --label "priority::high,status:ready"
glab issue update -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <IID> --label "status:in-progress" # WARNING: --label REPLACES the full set — see caveat below
glab issue close -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <IID> # then VERIFY: re-read the issue; it must show state=closed
glab issue note -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <IID> -m "Comment text" # Add comment
# MRs
glab mr list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> # Open MRs
glab mr create -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --fill --draft # Create draft MR
glab mr merge -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <MR_IID> # Merge MR
# Pipelines
glab pipeline list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --per-page 5 # Recent pipelines
glab pipeline status -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <ID> # Pipeline details
# API (no --repo exists here — the encoded endpoint and explicit host identify the target)
glab api --hostname "$GITLAB_HOST" "projects/${ENCODED_PROJECT_PATH}/issues?state=opened&per_page=50"
glab api --hostname "$GITLAB_HOST" "projects/${ENCODED_PROJECT_PATH}/milestones?state=active"
Label update caveat (PUT-replaces, not additive): glab issue update --label (and the underlying GitLab labels API) PUT-REPLACES the entire label set — it does not add to the existing set. To change a single label you must pass the FULL desired label list, or use the dedicated add/remove operations, which are themselves unreliable across glab versions. Preferred safe pattern: use --label (adds) together with --unlabel (removes) on glab issue update when your installed glab version supports both; otherwise read the current labels first, compute the full new set, and PUT once. The same PUT-replace semantics apply to glab mr update --label.
Close verification: after glab issue close <IID>, always verify the close actually landed — re-read the issue (glab issue view <IID>) and confirm state: closed in the output. A stale or wrong project path, or a silent 404, can report local success while closing nothing; use the canonical project identity above for API operations rather than resolving a numeric ID.
Commit-body close-keyword footgun: GitLab (and GitHub) auto-close an issue when a commit pushed to the default branch contains a close keyword — close/closes/closed/fix/fixes/fixed/resolve/resolves/resolved — followed by #N ANYWHERE in the commit body, not just the subject line. This fires even inside a negation ("does NOT close #N") — the platform pattern-matches the keyword + issue reference; it does not parse English negation, so the negation offers no protection. Rule: when a commit body needs to MENTION an issue without closing intent, always use a non-closing reference — refs #N, part of #N, siehe #N — never a close-keyword verb next to the number, negated or not.
-f/--raw-field vs -F/--field on glab api: -f (--raw-field) sends a literal string value with no coercion and no @file expansion. -F (--field) interprets a value starting with @ as a file to read, and coerces bare true/false/null/numeric strings to their typed form. Prefer -f for literal values — it avoids an unintended @-expansion when a value happens to start with @ (e.g. an @mention in a comment body).
GitHub (gh)
# Issues
gh issue list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --limit 50 # All open issues
gh issue list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --label "status:ready" --limit 10 # Ready to work on
gh issue list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --label "priority::high" --limit 10 # High priority
gh issue list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --state closed --limit 10 # Recently closed
gh issue view -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <NUMBER> # View issue details
gh issue view -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <NUMBER> --comments # With comments
gh issue create -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --title "title" --label "priority::high,status:ready"
gh issue edit -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <NUMBER> --add-label "status:in-progress"
gh issue close -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <NUMBER>
gh issue comment -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <NUMBER> --body "Comment text" # Add comment
# PRs
gh pr list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --state open # Open PRs
gh pr create -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --fill --draft # Create draft PR
gh pr merge -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <NUMBER> # Merge PR
# Workflows (CI equivalent)
gh run list -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --limit 5 # Recent workflow runs
gh run view -R <OWNER>/<REPO> <RUN_ID> # Run details
# API (no --repo exists here — the endpoint path IS the target; pin the host with --hostname)
gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues?state=open&per_page=50"
gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/milestones?state=open"
Issue Templates
Bug Template
## Description
What happens vs. what should happen.
## Steps to Reproduce
1.
2.
## Root Cause (if known)
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ]
Feature Template
## Goal
What should be achieved and why.
## Tasks
- [ ]
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ]
## Session Type
[housekeeping|feature|deep]
Carryover Template (from /close)
## [Carryover] Original Task Description
### What was completed
- [completed items]
### What remains
- [ ] [remaining task 1]
- [ ] [remaining task 2]
### Context for next session
[relevant context, file paths, decisions made]
### Revisit-Trigger
[the concrete condition or event that reopens this — e.g. "when <metric/state> passes <threshold>", "at the next <session type/release>". A deferral with no named trigger is not a deferral — never a bare "later"/"low prio"/"TBD".]
### Open Questions
_(optional — include only when unanswered questions remain in STATE.md `## Open Questions` at close; omit this section entirely otherwise)_
- [ ] [unanswered question 1] (source: W<N>/<agent>, prio: high|medium|low)
- [ ] [unanswered question 2] (source: W<N>/<agent>, prio: high|medium|low)
### Original Issue
Relates to #ORIGINAL_IID
### Revisit-Trigger is mandatory for the /close carryover template above: a carryover deferred without a concrete, checkable reopen condition is a rot risk — "later" reliably means "never". (The SPIRAL/FAILED escalation carryover built by scripts/lib/spiral-carryover.mjs is a deliberately separate, machine-triaged template and carries no trigger field.)
Discovery Finding
## [Discovery] <finding title>
**Probe:** <probe_name>
**Severity:** <priority::critical|high|medium|low>
**Category:** <code|infra|ui|arch|session|audit|vault|feature>
### Finding
<description of the problem>
### Evidence
- **File:** `<file_path>`
- **Line:** <line_number>
- **Code:**
<matched_text with surrounding context>
### Impact
<why this matters — severity rationale>
### Recommended Fix
<concrete fix suggestion>
### Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] <specific, verifiable condition>
- [ ] Quality gates pass after fix
Labels: type:discovery, priority::<level>, area:<inferred>, status:ready
Template-First Enforcement (PSA-005 + #519)
Pattern 3 of the gsd Pattern Adoption (Issue #519) registers a PreToolUse hook
hooks/pre-bash-templates-first.mjs that blocks gh|glab pr|mr|issue create|new
Bash calls when the current session contains no prior Read on a matching template file.
When this matters: before you or a subagent opens an MR, PR, or issue via CLI, a matching template must have been read in the current session:
- GitHub:
.github/pull_request_template.md/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE* - GitLab:
.gitlab/merge_request_templates/Default.md/.gitlab/issue_templates/*
Accepted template paths are configured in .orchestrator/policy/templates-policy.json
(versioned, operator-editable). Default behaviour:
enforcement: "block"— hook exits 2 when no prior template Read is found- Allow-list of host-specific template globs (GitHub + GitLab by default)
bypass_patterns— list of command substrings that skip the hook (e.g. CI/bot calls)
Bypass options for the current session (when the hook blocks unexpectedly):
- Read the template first — re-run the
createcall after aReadon the template path; the hook re-evaluates and sees the Read. - Session acknowledgement — write
.orchestrator/runtime/templates-acknowledged.jsoncontaining{ sessionId, acknowledgedAt }; the hook allows all subsequentcreatecalls in this session.
What the hook mechanically enforces (what this skill previously documented as convention only):
- "Template-first" for every new MR/PR/issue
- Prevents convention drift across repos by turning the documentation requirement into a hard gate — the same shift from rule to mechanism that PSA-003 made for destructive commands
If the hook blocks incorrectly, follow this sequence:
- Read the template — retry the
createcall. - If the hook still blocks, open a bug issue against
hooks/pre-bash-templates-first.mjswith reproduce steps (command, session ID, template path that should have matched).
Issue/MR Creation Checklist (with template-first gate active)
# 1. Read the relevant template first (satisfies the hook)
# GitLab MR
Read .gitlab/merge_request_templates/Default.md
# GitHub PR
Read .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
# 2. Then create — hook now passes
glab mr create -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --title "..." --description "..."
gh pr create -R <OWNER>/<REPO> --title "..." --body "..."
Cross-References
- Hook implementation:
hooks/pre-bash-templates-first.mjs - Read-history helper:
hooks/_lib/transcript-history.mjs(checks session transcript for prior Reads) - Enforcement policy:
.orchestrator/policy/templates-policy.json - Session acknowledgement:
.orchestrator/runtime/templates-acknowledged.json - Sister hook (destructive-command model):
hooks/pre-bash-destructive-guard.mjs - PRD: "gsd Pattern Adoption Quick-Wins" (#519; archived in the private Meta-Vault) § Pattern 3 + § 3 Gherkin Pattern 3
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 50
- Forks
- 7
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
ahel review
S4info
community integration — published by kanevry, not gitlab
Automated review, not a security audit. Ruleset v1.
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
gitlab-ops- Source
- github.com/kanevry/session-orchestrator