Go Generics and Type Parameters

SkillDev tools

Use when deciding whether to use Go generics, writing generic functions or types, choosing constraints, or picking between type aliases and type definitions. Also use when a user is writing a utility function that could work with multiple types, even if they don't mention generics explicitly. Does not cover interface design without generics (see go-interfaces).

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Go Generics and Type Parameters skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by cxuu/golang-skills in skills/go-generics/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Compatibility: Generics require Go 1.18+.

Resource Routing

  • references/CONSTRAINTS.md - Read when composing constraints, using type sets, or choosing between generics and interfaces.

When to Use Generics

Start with concrete types. Generalize only when a second type appears.

Prefer Generics When

  • Multiple types share identical logic (sorting, filtering, map/reduce)
  • You would otherwise rely on any and excessive type switching
  • You are building a reusable data structure (concurrent-safe set, ordered map)

Avoid Generics When

  • Only one type is being instantiated in practice
  • Interfaces already model the shared behavior cleanly
  • The generic code is harder to read than the type-specific alternative

"Write code, don't design types." — Robert Griesemer and Ian Lance Taylor

Decision Flow

Do multiple types share identical logic?
├─ No  → Use concrete types
├─ Yes → Do they share a useful interface?
│        ├─ Yes → Use an interface
│        └─ No  → Use generics

Bad:

// Premature generics: only ever called with int
func Sum[T constraints.Integer | constraints.Float](vals []T) T {
    var total T
    for _, v := range vals {
        total += v
    }
    return total
}

Good:

func SumInts(vals []int) int {
    var total int
    for _, v := range vals {
        total += v
    }
    return total
}

Type Parameter Naming

NameTypical Use
TGeneral type parameter
KMap key type
VMap value type
EElement/item type

For complex constraints, a short descriptive name is acceptable:

func Marshal[Opts encoding.MarshalOptions](v any, opts Opts) ([]byte, error)

Type Aliases vs Type Definitions

Type aliases (type Old = new.Name) are rare — use only for package migration or gradual API refactoring.


Constraint Composition

Combine constraints with ~ (underlying type) and | (union):

type Numeric interface {
    ~int | ~int8 | ~int16 | ~int32 | ~int64 |
    ~float32 | ~float64
}

func Sum[T Numeric](vals []T) T {
    var total T
    for _, v := range vals {
        total += v
    }
    return total
}

Use the constraints package or cmp package (Go 1.21+) for standard constraints like cmp.Ordered instead of writing your own.


Common Pitfalls

Don't Wrap Standard Library Types

// Bad: generic wrapper adds complexity without value
type Set[T comparable] struct {
    m map[T]struct{}
}

// Better: use map[T]struct{} directly when the usage is simple
seen := map[string]struct{}{}

Generics justify their complexity when they eliminate duplication across multiple call sites. A single-use generic is just indirection.

Don't Use Generics for Interface Satisfaction

// Bad: T is only used to satisfy an interface — just use the interface
func Process[T io.Reader](r T) error { ... }

// Good: accept the interface directly
func Process(r io.Reader) error { ... }

Avoid Over-Constraining

// Bad: constraint is more restrictive than needed
func Contains[T interface{ ~int | ~string }](slice []T, target T) bool { ... }

// Good: comparable is sufficient
func Contains[T comparable](slice []T, target T) bool { ... }

Quick Reference

TopicGuidance
When to use genericsOnly when multiple types share identical logic and interfaces don't suffice
Starting pointWrite concrete code first; generalize later
NamingSingle uppercase letter (T, K, V, E)
Type aliasesSame type, alternate name; use only for migration
Constraint compositionUse ~ for underlying types, `
Common pitfallDon't genericize single-use code or when interfaces suffice

Related Skills

  • Interfaces vs generics: See go-interfaces when deciding whether an interface already models the shared behavior without generics
  • Type declarations: See go-declarations when defining new types, type aliases, or choosing between type definitions and aliases
  • Documenting generic APIs: See go-documentation when writing doc comments and runnable examples for generic functions
  • Naming type parameters: See go-naming when choosing names for type parameters or constraint interfaces

Signals

GitHub stars
159
Forks
18
Last commit
Jun 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
go-generics
Source
github.com/cxuu/golang-skills