H-Index and Research Impact Metrics Guide
SkillMonitoring & opsUnderstanding and calculating research impact metrics
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
Then ask your AI: use the H-Index and Research Impact Metrics Guide skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills in skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/metadata/h-index-guide/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Understand, calculate, and responsibly interpret bibliometric indicators including h-index, impact factor, and related metrics.
Core Bibliometric Indicators
H-Index
The h-index (Hirsch index) is defined as: a researcher has an h-index of h if h of their papers have each been cited at least h times.
Example: If a researcher has published 20 papers with citation counts [120, 80, 55, 40, 22, 18, 15, 12, 10, 8, 5, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0], their h-index is 10 (10 papers with at least 10 citations each).
def calculate_h_index(citation_counts):
"""Calculate h-index from a list of citation counts."""
sorted_counts = sorted(citation_counts, reverse=True)
h = 0
for i, count in enumerate(sorted_counts):
if count >= i + 1:
h = i + 1
else:
break
return h
# Example
citations = [120, 80, 55, 40, 22, 18, 15, 12, 10, 8, 5, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]
print(f"h-index: {calculate_h_index(citations)}") # Output: 10
Related Author-Level Metrics
| Metric | Definition | Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| h-index | h papers with >= h citations | Simple, robust to outliers |
| i10-index | Number of papers with >= 10 citations | Intuitive threshold (Google Scholar uses this) |
| g-index | Largest g such that top g papers have >= g^2 total citations | Rewards highly cited papers more |
| m-quotient | h-index divided by years since first publication | Normalizes for career length |
| hI-norm | h-index divided by average number of co-authors | Adjusts for team size |
def calculate_g_index(citation_counts):
"""Calculate g-index from citation counts."""
sorted_counts = sorted(citation_counts, reverse=True)
cumulative = 0
g = 0
for i, count in enumerate(sorted_counts):
cumulative += count
if cumulative >= (i + 1) ** 2:
g = i + 1
return g
def calculate_i10_index(citation_counts):
"""Calculate i10-index."""
return sum(1 for c in citation_counts if c >= 10)
print(f"g-index: {calculate_g_index(citations)}") # Output: 19
print(f"i10-index: {calculate_i10_index(citations)}") # Output: 10
Journal-Level Metrics
Journal Impact Factor (JIF)
Published annually by Clarivate in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). The 2-year impact factor for year Y is:
JIF(Y) = (Citations in Y to articles published in Y-1 and Y-2)
/ (Number of citable items published in Y-1 and Y-2)
| Metric | Provider | Window | Notable Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact Factor | Clarivate (JCR) | 2-year or 5-year | Gold standard, subscription only |
| CiteScore | Scopus (Elsevier) | 4-year | Free, includes all document types |
| SJR (Scimago) | Scopus data | 3-year | Weights citations by journal prestige (PageRank-like) |
| SNIP | Scopus data | 3-year | Normalizes for citation potential of each field |
| h5-index | Google Scholar | 5-year | Free, h-index applied to a journal |
Looking Up Journal Metrics
import requests
# Using the OpenAlex API to get journal/source information
journal_name = "Nature"
response = requests.get(
"https://api.openalex.org/sources",
params={"filter": f"display_name.search:{journal_name}", "per_page": 5}
)
results = response.json()["results"]
for source in results:
print(f"Name: {source['display_name']}")
print(f" ISSN: {source.get('issn_l', 'N/A')}")
print(f" Works count: {source.get('works_count', 'N/A')}")
print(f" Cited by count: {source.get('cited_by_count', 'N/A')}")
print(f" h-index: {source.get('summary_stats', {}).get('h_index', 'N/A')}")
print(f" 2-year mean citedness: {source.get('summary_stats', {}).get('2yr_mean_citedness', 'N/A')}")
Calculating Your Own H-Index
From Google Scholar
Google Scholar profiles automatically display h-index and i10-index. No calculation needed, but coverage is the broadest (includes non-peer-reviewed sources).
From OpenAlex
# OpenAlex provides h-index directly in author profiles
author_name = "Geoffrey Hinton"
response = requests.get(
"https://api.openalex.org/authors",
params={"filter": f"display_name.search:{author_name}", "per_page": 1}
)
author = response.json()["results"][0]
print(f"h-index: {author['summary_stats']['h_index']}")
print(f"i10-index: {author['summary_stats']['i10_index']}")
print(f"2-year mean citedness: {author['summary_stats']['2yr_mean_citedness']}")
Responsible Use of Metrics
Known Limitations
- Field dependence: Average citation rates vary dramatically across disciplines. An h-index of 20 is excellent in mathematics but modest in biomedical sciences.
- Career stage bias: The h-index monotonically increases over time. Always compare within career stage (m-quotient helps).
- Self-citation: Some databases include self-citations in h-index calculation.
- Database coverage: Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science yield different h-index values for the same author.
- Gaming: Metrics can be inflated through citation cartels, salami slicing, and excessive self-citation.
DORA Declaration
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) recommends:
- Do not use journal-based metrics (such as impact factor) as a surrogate measure of individual research quality.
- Assess research on its own merits rather than on the basis of the journal in which it is published.
- Use article-level metrics alongside qualitative indicators for assessment.
Best Practices for Reporting
- Always specify the source database and date when reporting h-index
- Report multiple metrics rather than relying on a single number
- Provide field-normalized indicators (FWCI, SNIP) when comparing across disciplines
- Include qualitative achievements alongside quantitative metrics in CVs and promotion cases
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 531
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
h-index-guide- Source
- github.com/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills
github.com/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills
Related picks
Skill · wshobson
The pick for Pythonpython-pro
Skill · jeffallan
The pick for Pythonacademic-paper-composer
Skill · brycewang-stanford
The pick for Academic03-academic-writing
Skill · 24kchengye
The pick for Academicinternal-comms
Skill · anthropics
More in Monitoring & opsagent-eval
Skill · affaan-m
More in Monitoring & ops