Homoglyph Detector
SkillDev toolsByte-level Unicode homoglyph detection for identifying invisible character substitutions in code
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
Then ask your AI: use the Homoglyph Detector skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by a5c-ai/babysitter in library/specializations/security-compliance/skills/homoglyph-detector/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Byte-level forensic analysis of code changes to detect Unicode homoglyph substitutions — characters that look identical to ASCII in every editor and diff tool but have different codepoints, silently breaking string comparisons, dictionary lookups, and identifier resolution.
Purpose
Homoglyph attacks (related to CVE-2021-42574 "Trojan Source") are the highest-stealth trojan technique. A Cyrillic р (U+0440) looks identical to a Latin p (U+0070) in every font, editor, and diff viewer. The only way to detect it is byte-level analysis via hexdump.
This skill pipes git diffs through hexdump -C and scans for multi-byte UTF-8 sequences where single-byte ASCII is expected, particularly in string literals used as dictionary keys, variable names, and identifiers.
Capabilities
Confusable Character Detection
Scans for these high-risk Unicode confusables:
| Latin | Cyrillic | Greek | UTF-8 Bytes |
|---|---|---|---|
| a (61) | а (D0 B0) | α (CE B1) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| c (63) | с (D1 81) | — | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| e (65) | е (D0 B5) | ε (CE B5) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| o (6F) | о (D0 BE) | ο (CE BF) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| p (70) | р (D1 80) | ρ (CF 81) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| x (78) | х (D1 85) | χ (CF 87) | 1 vs 2 bytes |
| y (79) | у (D1 83) | — | 1 vs 2 bytes |
Zero-Width Character Detection
- U+200B — Zero-width space
- U+200C — Zero-width non-joiner
- U+200D — Zero-width joiner
- U+FEFF — Byte order mark (in non-BOM position)
Bidi Control Character Detection (Trojan Source)
- U+200F — Right-to-left mark
- U+200E — Left-to-right mark
- U+202A — Left-to-right embedding
- U+202B — Right-to-left embedding
- U+202C — Pop directional formatting
- U+2066 — Left-to-right isolate
- U+2067 — Right-to-left isolate
Context-Aware Analysis
- Focuses on string literals (dictionary keys, config values)
- Focuses on identifiers (variable names, function names, class names)
- Ignores legitimate Unicode in comments, docstrings, and i18n strings
- Compares byte patterns between removed (-) and added (+) diff lines
Input Schema
{
"type": "object",
"required": ["projectRoot", "changedFiles"],
"properties": {
"projectRoot": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Absolute path to the git repository"
},
"changedFiles": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"description": "List of changed file paths to scan"
},
"scanMode": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["uncommitted", "commit-range", "branch-diff"],
"default": "uncommitted"
},
"baseRef": { "type": "string" },
"headRef": { "type": "string" }
}
}
Output Schema
{
"type": "object",
"required": ["filesScanned", "homoglyphsFound", "verdict"],
"properties": {
"filesScanned": { "type": "number" },
"homoglyphsFound": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"file": { "type": "string" },
"line": { "type": "number" },
"byteOffset": { "type": "string" },
"context": { "type": "string" },
"expectedAscii": { "type": "string" },
"actualBytes": { "type": "string" },
"unicodeCodepoint": { "type": "string" },
"scriptName": { "type": "string" },
"impact": { "type": "string" }
}
}
},
"bidiControlChars": { "type": "array" },
"verdict": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["CLEAN", "HOMOGLYPH_DETECTED"]
}
}
}
Detection Method
# Step 1: Pipe git diff through hexdump
git diff <file> | hexdump -C
# Step 2: In added (+) lines, look for multi-byte sequences
# where the removed (-) line had single-byte ASCII
#
# Example — Latin 'p' vs Cyrillic 'р':
# Removed: 22 70 70 67 22 | "ppg" | ← 70 = Latin 'p'
# Added: 22 d1 80 70 67 | "..pg" | ← d1 80 = Cyrillic 'р'
#
# The d1 80 bytes where 70 should be = HOMOGLYPH DETECTED
Usage Example
skill: {
name: 'homoglyph-detector',
context: {
projectRoot: '/path/to/project',
changedFiles: ['backend/app/prediction/temporal.py'],
scanMode: 'uncommitted'
}
}
Real-World Example
From adversarial drill #6:
- Attack: Dictionary key
"ppg"changed to"рpg"(Cyrillic р + Latin pg) - Camouflage: 4 lines of harmless
round()wrappers added as decoy - Impact: All
dict.get("ppg")lookups return default0, disabling trend detection - Detection:
hexdump -Crevealed bytesd1 80where70was expected
Process Files
nation-state-trojan-detection.js— Phase 2: Homoglyph Detection (parallel with semantic analysis)
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 2k
- Forks
- 112
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
homoglyph-detector- Source
- github.com/a5c-ai/babysitter
Related picks
Skill · thedaviddias
The pick for JavaScriptmodern-javascript-patterns
Skill · wshobson
The pick for JavaScriptaudit-dependencies
Skill · stbenjam
The pick for Dependenciesmaintenance-orchestration
Skill · a5c-ai
The pick for Dependenciessupply-chain-risk-auditor
Skill · trailofbits
The pick for Supply Chainsupply-chain-digital-twin
Skill · a5c-ai
The pick for Supply Chain