Implementing Kubernetes Pod Security Standards

SkillCloud & infra

Guides your agent to pick the right Kubernetes pod security profile and make workloads comply with it.

Then ask your AI: use the Implementing Kubernetes Pod Security Standards skill

Details

Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.

Add it as a step in a pipeline you build on Ahel, or connect Ahel to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex and ask your AI to use it.

About this skill

Chooses and applies the correct Kubernetes Pod Security Standard (Privileged, Baseline, Restricted) for a workload: what each profile forbids, how to map existing workloads to a profile, which securityContext fields must change, and how to plan a PodSecurityPolicy-to-PSS migration without breaking r

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills in skills/implementing-kubernetes-pod-security-standards/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.

Overview

Pod Security Standards (PSS) define three levels of security policies -- Privileged, Baseline, and Restricted -- enforced by the Pod Security Admission (PSA) controller built into Kubernetes 1.25+. PSA replaces the deprecated PodSecurityPolicy and provides namespace-level enforcement with three modes: enforce, audit, and warn.

When to Use

  • Deciding whether a namespace or workload belongs at Privileged, Baseline, or Restricted
  • Auditing which existing workloads would be rejected if Restricted were enforced today
  • Translating a "must meet Restricted" requirement into concrete securityContext changes
  • Planning a PodSecurityPolicy migration and predicting what will break before it does
  • Mapping pod security posture to a compliance control (NIST PR.PS-01, CIS Kubernetes)

Not this skill: configuring the controller that enforces these profiles — namespace labels, AdmissionConfiguration, exemptions, or debugging a pod PSA rejected. Use implementing-pod-security-admission-controller.

Prerequisites

  • Kubernetes cluster 1.25+ (PSA GA)
  • kubectl configured with cluster-admin access
  • Understanding of Linux capabilities and security contexts

Core Concepts

Three Security Profiles

ProfilePurposeRestrictions
PrivilegedUnrestricted, system workloadsNone
BaselinePrevents known escalationsNo hostNetwork, hostPID, hostIPC, privileged containers, dangerous capabilities
RestrictedHardened best practicesNon-root, drop ALL caps, seccomp required, read-only rootfs recommended

Three Enforcement Modes

ModeBehavior
enforceRejects pods that violate the policy
auditLogs violations in audit log but allows pod
warnReturns warning to user but allows pod

Workflow

Step 1: Label Namespaces for PSA

# Restricted namespace - production workloads
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: production
  labels:
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: latest
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-version: latest
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn-version: latest
# Baseline namespace - general workloads
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: staging
  labels:
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: baseline
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: latest
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-version: latest
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn-version: latest
# Privileged namespace - system components only
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: kube-system
  labels:
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: privileged
    pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: latest

Step 2: Apply Labels to Existing Namespaces

# Apply restricted enforcement to production
kubectl label namespace production \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=restricted \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted \
  --overwrite

# Apply baseline to staging with restricted warnings
kubectl label namespace staging \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=baseline \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=restricted \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted \
  --overwrite

# Check labels on all namespaces
kubectl get namespaces -L pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce

Step 3: Create Compliant Pod Specs

# Restricted-compliant deployment
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: secure-app
  namespace: production
spec:
  replicas: 3
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: secure-app
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: secure-app
    spec:
      automountServiceAccountToken: false
      securityContext:
        runAsNonRoot: true
        runAsUser: 65534
        runAsGroup: 65534
        fsGroup: 65534
        seccompProfile:
          type: RuntimeDefault
      containers:
        - name: app
          image: myregistry.com/myapp:v1.0.0@sha256:abc123
          ports:
            - containerPort: 8080
              protocol: TCP
          securityContext:
            allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
            readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
            capabilities:
              drop:
                - ALL
            runAsNonRoot: true
            runAsUser: 65534
          resources:
            requests:
              memory: "64Mi"
              cpu: "100m"
            limits:
              memory: "256Mi"
              cpu: "500m"
          volumeMounts:
            - name: tmp
              mountPath: /tmp
            - name: cache
              mountPath: /var/cache
      volumes:
        - name: tmp
          emptyDir:
            sizeLimit: 100Mi
        - name: cache
          emptyDir:
            sizeLimit: 50Mi

Step 4: Gradual Migration Strategy

# Phase 1: Audit mode - discover violations without blocking
kubectl label namespace my-namespace \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=restricted \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted

# Check audit logs for violations
kubectl logs -n kube-system -l component=kube-apiserver | grep "pod-security"

# Phase 2: Enforce baseline, warn on restricted
kubectl label namespace my-namespace \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=baseline \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=restricted \
  --overwrite

# Phase 3: Full restricted enforcement
kubectl label namespace my-namespace \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted \
  --overwrite

Step 5: Dry-Run Enforcement Testing

# Test what would happen with restricted enforcement
kubectl label --dry-run=server --overwrite namespace my-namespace \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=restricted

# Example output:
# Warning: existing pods in namespace "my-namespace" violate the new
# PodSecurity enforce level "restricted:latest"
# Warning: nginx-xxx: allowPrivilegeEscalation != false,
#   unrestricted capabilities, runAsNonRoot != true, seccompProfile

Baseline Profile Restrictions

ControlRestrictedRequirement
HostProcessMust not setPods cannot use Windows HostProcess
Host NamespacesMust not setNo hostNetwork, hostPID, hostIPC
PrivilegedMust not setNo privileged: true
CapabilitiesBaseline list onlyOnly NET_BIND_SERVICE, drop ALL for restricted
HostPath VolumesMust not useNo hostPath volume mounts
Host PortsMust not useNo hostPort in container spec
AppArmorDefault/runtimeCannot set to unconfined
SELinuxLimited typesOnly container_t, container_init_t, container_kvm_t
/proc Mount TypeDefault onlyMust use Default proc mount
SeccompRuntimeDefault or LocalhostMust specify seccomp profile (restricted)
SysctlsSafe set onlyLimited to safe sysctls

Validation Commands

# Verify namespace labels
kubectl get ns --show-labels | grep pod-security

# Test pod creation against policy
kubectl run test-pod --image=nginx --namespace=production --dry-run=server

# Check for violations in audit logs
kubectl get events --field-selector reason=FailedCreate -A

# Scan with Kubescape for PSS compliance
kubescape scan framework nsa --namespace production

References

Signals

GitHub stars
34k
Forks
4k
Last commit
Aug 2026

Ahel review

  • S4info
    community integration, published by mukul975, not kubernetes

Automated review, not a security audit. Ruleset v1+k2.

Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
implementing-kubernetes-pod-security-standards
Source
github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills