Injection Security Check (A05:2025)

SkillDatabases & data

Detects SQL, command, and template injection caused by user input reaching an

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Injection Security Check (A05:2025) skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by thejefflarson/soundcheck in .claude/skills/injection/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

What this checks

Protects against SQL, command, and template injection caused by passing user-controlled data to an interpreter without sanitization. Exploitation leads to full database read/write, remote code execution, and data exfiltration. For NoSQL-specific injection (MongoDB operator injection, $where), see nosql-injection.

Vulnerable patterns

  • "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + userId — user input concatenated into SQL
  • exec("convert " + filename) — shell expansion allows ; rm -rf /
  • eval(userInput) — arbitrary code execution from user-supplied string
  • Template("Hello " + name) — template body built from user input

Fix immediately

For each vulnerable call site, apply the appropriate control:

  • SQL: use parameterized queries or an ORM — never concatenate user input into query strings
  • Shell: pass arguments as an array/list, never as an interpolated string — disable shell expansion
  • Templates: use an engine that autoescapes by default and pass user values through the parameter interface. Python: Environment(autoescape=True) (bool literal, not select_autoescape() with from_string()). Go: html/template, never text/template for HTTP output. Java FreeMarker: cfg.setOutputFormat(HTMLOutputFormat.INSTANCE). Rust: handlebars (escapes by default). Never build the template body from user input.
  • eval/exec: remove entirely — there is no safe way to evaluate user-supplied code strings

Flag the vulnerable call site, explain the risk and the correct fix pattern, then continue with the original task.

Verification

Confirm the following properties hold (language-agnostic):

  • User-controlled values reach SQL only as bound parameters — never via string interpolation, concatenation, or format strings
  • User-controlled values reach subprocess execution only as discrete argument list elements — never via a shell string or interpolated command string
  • No dynamic evaluation of user-supplied strings as code (Python eval/exec, JS eval/new Function, etc. removed — not replaced with a safer-looking variant of the same function)
  • Templates use an engine where HTML autoescaping is either enabled explicitly or is the documented default (Flask render_template, Go html/template, Rust handlebars, Jinja2 Environment(autoescape=True) — NOT Jinja2 Template() direct, NOT Go text/template), and user values are passed through the engine's parameter interface — never by building the template body from user input

References

Signals

GitHub stars
20
Last commit
Jul 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
injection
Source
github.com/thejefflarson/soundcheck