Interpret Regression Results

SkillSearch

Writes academic prose interpreting regression output. Use when describing estimation results in manuscript-ready language.

Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.

Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.

Then ask your AI: use the Interpret Regression Results skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills in skills/29-quarcs-lab-project20XXy/dot-claude/skills/interpret-results/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Write academic prose interpreting estimation output, suitable for pasting into index.qmd.

Arguments

  • $ARGUMENTS — regression output (pasted directly), or a notebook cell reference (e.g., "notebook-02#tbl-main-regression")

Steps

  1. Parse the regression output:

    • If a notebook cell reference is provided, read that notebook and extract the output from the specified cell
    • If output is pasted directly, parse the coefficients, standard errors, significance levels, and fit statistics
  2. Identify key elements:

    • Dependent variable
    • Key independent variable(s) of interest (vs. controls)
    • Significance levels and confidence intervals
    • R-squared, N, F-statistic
    • Fixed effects or clustering used
  3. Draft 1–3 paragraphs of academic prose covering:

    • Statistical significance: Which coefficients are significant at which levels
    • Direction and magnitude: Sign and size of key coefficients, in interpretable units
    • Economic significance: What the coefficient means in practical terms (e.g., "a one standard deviation increase in X is associated with a Y% change in the outcome")
    • Comparison across specifications: If multiple columns, note how results change with additional controls or FE
    • Robustness: Note whether results are stable across specifications
  4. Use appropriate academic hedging language:

    • "The results suggest..." / "We find evidence consistent with..."
    • "The coefficient is statistically significant at the 5% level"
    • "The point estimate implies that..."
    • Avoid causal language unless the identification strategy supports it
  5. Format the output for index.qmd:

    • Use Quarto cross-references where appropriate (e.g., "as shown in @tbl-main-regression")
    • Include parenthetical references to table columns (e.g., "Column (3)")
    • Note: use plain prose for cross-references to embedded content to avoid Quarto crossref warnings
  6. Present the draft to the user for review. Do not insert into index.qmd without approval.

Error handling

  • If the output format is not recognized, ask the user to clarify which values are coefficients, SEs, and significance indicators.

Signals

GitHub stars
4k
Forks
531
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
interpret-results
Source
github.com/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills