Phase 1 — Interview → Plan
SkillDev toolsTurns a rough agent idea into a clear build plan. Once added, your AI interviews you about the one job your agent should do, then writes up a build sheet covering what version one needs, what can wait for version two, and how to test the agent. You can scope the whole idea without handing over an API key.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
After adding it, tell your AI something like 'help me scope an agent' or 'I have an idea for an agent' and it will start asking you questions. Answer them and you will end up with a written build sheet for your agent.
Then ask your AI: use the Phase 1 — Interview → Plan skill
What your AI can do with it
- Interview you about the one job your agent should do
- Turn your answers into a written build sheet
- Map out the building blocks the agent needs
- Separate what to build in version one from what to defer to version two
- Draft a plan for evaluating the agent
- Scope an idea without needing an API key
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by genkovich/sdd in skills/interview/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Open warmly with one or two examples from
../../references/examples-bank.md, then interview
the founder into a build sheet. No API key needed in this phase — the output
is a plan.
The six intake slots (ask one at a time; use AskUserQuestion for choices)
| Slot | Question | Maps to |
|---|---|---|
| Job | "What one job should this agent do end-to-end?" | agent.system + outcome description |
| Trigger | "What kicks it off — you ask it, an event, or a schedule?" | on-demand / event / cron |
| Inputs | "What does it read?" (files, repo, memory, gmail/slack/github, web) | resources / MCP servers / memory |
| Actions | "What does it do?" (draft, write, call APIs, run code) | agent toolset / custom tools / MCP |
| Done | "How would you grade a good run?" | outcome rubric (required) |
| Recurrence | "Once, on request, or on a cadence?" | single-pass / grade-loop / cron-loop |
See ../../references/interview-to-config.md
for the full mapping.
Workflow
- Interview. Walk the six slots. Capture the founder's own words — never invent specifics they didn't claim.
- Map to primitives.
MCP inputs become schema-true mock custom tools in v0 and a v1 deferral to wire the real server. Irreversible actions (send/publish) become v2 deferrals behindpython3 scripts/interview_planner.py \ --job "Triage overnight support email" --trigger schedule \ --inputs "gmail,memory" --actions "label,reply" \ --dod "one label per email, grounded reason, no invented facts" \ --recurrence daily --out ./my-agent/plan.jsonalways_ask. - Assemble the sheet.
python3 scripts/build_sheet_builder.py --plan ./my-agent/plan.json --out-dir ./my-agent - Validate limits.
FAIL blocks progress; fix and re-run. WARN is advisory (surface it).python3 scripts/primitives_validator.py --sheet ./my-agent/build-sheet.json - Record the plan in the goal.
goal_state.py set --phase stage-launch --artifact build_sheet=./my-agent/build-sheet.json, then advance.
Hard rules
- v0 is the core job only. Everything else is a versioned deferral with a reason and an exact mechanism.
- Their problem, their words.
- No key yet. The interview produces a plan; the key is a Phase-2 concern.
Forcing-question library (recommend + cite)
- "What one job — singular?" Recommend: the most-repeated task. Cite: interview-to-config.md. Two jobs → two agents.
- "Real integration or v0 mock?" Recommend: mock; wire MCP as v1. Cite: interview-to-config.md rule 1.
- "How do you grade it?" Recommend: 3–5 grounded rubric lines. Cite: cma-primitives.md (rubric required).
- "Smarter over time?" Recommend: attach memory only if yes. Cite: cma-primitives.md (memory limits + injection).
- "Once, or on a cadence?" Recommend: on-demand v0, schedule as Phase-4. Cite: loops-and-workflows.md.
Tools
scripts/interview_planner.py— answers → primitives skeleton + deferrals.scripts/build_sheet_builder.py— assemble/normalize build-sheet.json.scripts/primitives_validator.py— validate vs CMA limits (PASS/WARN/FAIL).
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 140
- Forks
- 51
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
interview- Source
- github.com/genkovich/sdd