Patina

---

Live Deployments

Surface	URL
App	patinadata.xyz
Docs	patinadata.xyz/docs
MCP	patinadata.xyz/api/mcp
Verifier	patinadata.xyz/verify
Registry	io.github.ramakrishnanhulk20/patina
Signing address	0x3989bdFaf3BA242d27B4D0cEed98F446d0c52DAD

---

Overview

Patina reads the history in accounts somebody already owns and turns it into portable, verifiable evidence that a real human has been there for years. It is built on Vana, the data portability protocol: the data lives in the user's own Personal Server, is read once under a grant they can revoke, and never passes through an OAuth handoff that keeps it.

Sybil resistance is unsolved and expensive. An airdrop, a quadratic funding round, a DAO vote or a free trial all need to know whether they are talking to a thousand people or to one person with a thousand wallets. The usual answers are poor: biometrics are invasive, KYC destroys privacy, and most behavioural signals can simply be bought.

Somebody running an account farm can buy followers, bulk-upload posts and fill in a convincing profile. What they cannot buy is a decade.

Why Patina?

	KYC	World ID / proof of personhood	Patina
Proves years of history	No	No	Yes
Proves you are one unique person	Partly	Yes	No
Works without a wallet	Yes	No	Yes
Works without biometrics	Yes	No	Yes
User can revoke access afterwards	No	No	Yes
Another app can reuse the proof	No	Yes	Yes

Patina answers tenure, not uniqueness. A freshly verified unique human can be produced today; sixteen years of corroborated activity cannot. The two are complementary, and the tool descriptions say so rather than implying otherwise.

---

Features

Ownership proved, not assumed

Collection is meant to run through Vana Desktop, which opens a browser on the user's own machine and asks them to sign in. Credentials never leave the device and Patina never sees a password.

But Vana has two collection paths and does not report which one it used. The other reads a public page from a profile URL, which proves an account exists and nothing about who holds it. So "desktop only" cannot be asked for; it has to be forced.

Every source therefore requires one scope a public page cannot serve, and the read is refused if it does not come back. LinkedIn must produce connection dates, Spotify saved tracks, YouTube its Watch Later list. A request containing something private cannot be answered from a public profile, so the person ends up on Desktop and has to log in. sources.test.ts fails if a source is ever added without one.

Steam was withdrawn for the same reason. Its connector never signs anybody in: it takes a Steam Web API key and a Steam ID, and a Steam ID is public. Anyone could have handed Patina a stranger's account age and friend dates as their own, and unlike YouTube there was no private scope to require instead.

Instagram is paused for a related reason. Its proof scope, instagram.posts, is one Vana's server collects from the public page, so a read proves the account exists and nothing about who holds it, and Instagram has no private scope Patina could require instead. It is not offered, both Vana routes refuse it before any money is spent, the handle resolver will not look it up, and Instagram data already stored is left out of every score. It comes back when the phone app's signed-in proof lands.

Eight sources, seventeen scopes

GitHub, LinkedIn, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon, Uber, DoorDash and Shop. All of a source's scopes go in one approval, so the whole manifest is eight approval trips rather than seventeen.

Timestamps in, content out

Every scope is requested for its dates. Captions, addresses, emails, track names, game titles and other people's names are discarded before anything is stored, and a test fails if any of them reach the store.

Signed, portable, and dated

Every non-provisional score carries an EIP-191 attestation anyone can verify offline against Patina's published address. No key, no OAuth, CORS open.

Attestations expire after thirty days, and the expiry sits inside the signed message rather than beside it, so checking freshness stays offline too. A revocation list would have fixed the same problem by making every verifier call Patina, which is exactly the dependency people integrate to avoid. Scores are signed with a key separate from the one holding the escrow balance, so a leak of one is not a leak of both.

Answerable about itself

/api/health does a real write-and-read against the database and a live read of the escrow balance, and returns 503 when the deployment cannot serve the next person, so ordinary uptime monitoring catches an outage without being taught what to look for. A password-gated /admin shows the funnel, the user numbers and how many more connections the balance will fund. Funnel counting is done server-side: no third-party script, no cookie banner, nothing that contradicts the privacy page.

Readable by agents

An MCP server exposes the score to AI agents mid-conversation, with a handle resolver that returns tenure without revealing identity.

---

The Score

Six components, weighted by how expensive each one is in time rather than in money.

Component	Max	What it measures
Age	30	The oldest date provable across every connected source. Full marks at twelve years.
Continuity	25	Distinct months the person was actually present for, as absolute count times coverage.
Corroboration	15	Independent sources agreeing on the date, each weighted by its own age.
Vouches	12	When other people chose to connect, not how many. Weighted by how long ago.
Depth	10	Things actually made, discounted when the volume arrived in one burst.
Breadth	8	Independent accounts backing each other up.

Age and the two time components are earned outright. Depth, Vouches and Breadth are gated behind them: an attacker can manufacture volume, friends and breadth in an afternoon, so those only count to the extent that real elapsed history backs them up. A floor of 15% stops a genuinely young person being flattened to zero for the crime of being nineteen.

Scored against reference profiles, asserted in score.test.ts:

Profile	Score
Eleven active years across four accounts	95
Ordinary: eleven years, two accounts, real gaps	71
Genuinely young: three years, two accounts, real	26
Account farm: 3,900 bought followers, 120 posts in one week	2

The gap between an ordinary person and a farm is 69 points. That gap is the product.

Honest limits

Stated on the site itself, not buried here:

• It cannot prove personhood. It reports how much real history it can see. That is evidence, not a certificate.
• A low score is not an accusation. Young, private or quiet accounts score low and are doing nothing wrong.
• Aged accounts can be bought. That turns a free attack into an expensive one whose price climbs with age. It does not make it impossible.
• Desktop proves session control, not ownership. A bought account arrives with its password. The bar moves from "knows a username" to "holds the credentials", which is a large jump and not the same word.
• The proof scope is a floor, not a guarantee. Requiring something private forces a real sign-in, and a real sign-in is still only a sign-in. What it rules out is somebody scoring a stranger's public profile, which is the failure that would make the whole number meaningless.

---

What is read, and what is kept

Every scope below is requested for its timestamps. This table is the trust argument, so it is on the privacy page in roughly this form too.

Scope	Kept	Discarded on arrival
linkedin.connections	dateConnected[], count	names, headlines, profile URLs
instagram.posts	nothing new while Instagram is paused; data already held is not scored	captions, images, likes, the entire who_liked[] array
spotify.savedTracks	added_at[], total	track names, artists, albums
github.history	createdAt[], hashed repo, summed engagement	PR and issue titles and bodies
linkedin.experience / education	parsed date ranges	companies, job titles, schools, grades
uber.trips	requestTime[], count	pickup and dropoff addresses, fares, cities
amazon / doordash / shop orders	dates, count	items, merchants, totals, delivery addresses
youtube.profile	joinedDate, counts	email address
youtube.watchLater	nothing at all	everything; it is requested only as proof of a signed-in session

Timestamps collapse to month buckets before storage. The scorer only ever asks about months, so holding anything finer would be holding it for no reason.

---

Architecture

Connect flow

graph LR
    U[User] -->|1 Connect| P[Patina]
    P -->|2 createAccessRequest<br/>all scopes for one source| V[Vana Account API]
    V -->|3 approval URL| U
    U -->|4 Open in Vana Desktop| D[Vana Desktop]
    D -->|5 Playwright signs in<br/>on the user's machine| S[Source]
    S -->|6 import| PS[Personal Server]
    P -->|7 read every scope<br/>one grant| PS
    P -->|8 settle 402| E[Escrow Gateway]
    P -->|9 normalise, discard, score| R[(Redis)]

Read and settle

sequenceDiagram
    participant App as Patina
    participant PS as Personal Server
    participant GW as Escrow Gateway

    App->>PS: GET /v1/data/{scope}
    PS-->>App: 402 with accessRecord
    App->>GW: authorizeGrantPayment(accessRecord)
    GW-->>App: receipt
    App->>PS: GET /v1/data/{scope}
    PS-->>App: 200 payload
    Note over App: repeat per scope, same grant
    App->>PS: acknowledgeRead (once, at the end)

acknowledgeRead moves the request to completed, which is terminal and not read-ready. Firing it after the first scope would strand the rest behind a Personal Server no longer serving them, after the user had paid.

Scoring pipeline

graph LR
    RAW[Raw payload] -->|readScope| F[Fragment<br/>months + counts]
    F -->|stored by scope| DB[(Redis)]
    DB -->|evidenceFrom| EV[Evidence]
    EV -->|scorePatina| SC[Score]
    EV -->|buildStory| ST[Story]
    SC -->|buildAttestation| AT[Signed attestation]

Fragments are keyed by scope and merged at scoring time. A retried read overwrites its fragment rather than adding its months a second time, so a stuttering connection cannot inflate a score.

---

Quick Start

Prerequisites

• Node 20+
• A Vana app identity from account.vana.org/developers
• Upstash Redis credentials (optional locally; falls back to an in-memory store)

Installation

git clone https://github.com/ramakrishnanhulk20/Patina.git
cd Patina
npm install
cp .env.example .env.local

Fill in VANA_APP_PRIVATE_KEY and VANA_APP_URL, then register the app and fund its escrow:

npm run register:moksha

Development

npm run dev          # development server
npm test             # 118 tests
npm run typecheck    # types, ignoring generated route types
npm run verify       # typecheck + tests + production build

---

Integration

REST

Any public score, no key and no OAuth:

curl https://patinadata.xyz/api/verify/ramkumar

{
  "username": "ramkumar",
  "score": 71,
  "verdict": "Well established",
  "oldestYear": 2012,
  "yearsOfHistory": 13.6,
  "sourcesConnected": ["github", "linkedin", "spotify"],
  "provisional": false,
  "issuedAt": "2026-08-26T12:00:00.000Z",
  "expiresAt": "2026-09-25T12:00:00.000Z",
  "attestation": {
    "app": "0x...",
    "message": "Patina score attestation

username: ramkumar
score: 71/100
...
expiresAt: 2026-09-25T12:00:00.000Z
app: 0x...",
    "signature": "0x...",
    "expiresAt": "2026-09-25T12:00:00.000Z"
  }
}

Verify an attestation offline

import { verifyMessage } from "viem";

const ok = await verifyMessage({
  address: "0x3989bdFaf3BA242d27B4D0cEed98F446d0c52DAD",
  message: attestation.message,
  signature: attestation.signature,
});

MCP

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "patina": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://patinadata.xyz/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Tool	Answers
get_patina_score	The full breakdown for a Patina username
check_threshold	A yes/no trust gate on years, score or source count
resolve_identity	A GitHub or LinkedIn handle to a score, without revealing identity. Instagram lookups are paused
verify_attestation	Whether a signature is genuinely Patina's

---

Test Results

174 passing

Suite	Tests	Covers
normalize.test.ts	30	Envelope shapes, discard guarantees, idempotency
score.test.ts	27	Every component, the gating, the reference profiles
store.test.ts	26	Cross-device identity, usernames, removing one source, deletion
mcp-lookup.test.ts	20	Privacy rules on the resolver, signing, verdict drift
story.test.ts	19	Timeline, activity, exhibits, thin-history copy
routes.test.ts	15	Real HTTP requests: sessions, the signing floor, the admin gate
device.test.ts	12	Which devices can finish a connection
attest.test.ts	10	Signing, expiry, key separation, published-address drift
sources.test.ts	9	The ownership invariant: no source may be answerable from a public page
ratelimit.test.ts	4	Escrow abuse limits
altcha.test.ts	2	Proof-of-work bot check

The one worth knowing about: nothing sensitive survives normalisation feeds in a payload stuffed with a real-looking email address, two home addresses, a caption, a colleague's full name and LinkedIn URL, a game title, an employer, a song, a product and a restaurant, then asserts that none of the thirteen appear anywhere in what gets saved.

---

Project Structure

src/
├── app/
│   ├── api/
│   │   ├── vana/          request + data: the connect spine
│   │   ├── patina/        me, username, data, restore, delete
│   │   ├── admin/         session, index rebuild
│   │   ├── verify/        public score lookup
│   │   ├── badge/         embeddable SVG badge
│   │   └── mcp/           MCP server
│   ├── connect/           the evidence board, and the phone handoff
│   ├── my-data/           see it, download it, remove any of it
│   ├── admin/             the funnel, the numbers, the money left
│   ├── u/[username]/      public page and story
│   ├── verify/            verifier, including an offline checker
│   └── docs/              integration reference
└── lib/
    ├── score.ts           the whole argument, weight by weight
    ├── normalize.ts       18 scopes in, timestamps out
    ├── sources.ts         the manifest, and the proof scope each source must return
    ├── device.ts          whether this device can finish a connection at all
    ├── vana.ts            app identity, one controller per source
    ├── vana-settle-read.ts  paid reads, escrow settlement
    ├── escrow-balance.ts  how many more connections the balance will fund
    ├── metrics.ts         the funnel, counted server-side and nowhere else
    ├── store.ts           profiles keyed on Personal Server identity
    ├── admin.ts           one operator, one password, fails closed
    ├── story.ts           evidence as a narrative, and exhibits
    ├── attest.ts          signed attestations, expiring, on their own key
    └── mcp-lookup.ts      what an agent is allowed to learn

src/lib/score.ts is the whole argument. Every weight carries a comment explaining why it is what it is.

---

Tech Stack

Layer	Choice
Framework	Next.js 16, React 19, App Router
Language	TypeScript
Styling	Tailwind CSS 4, custom token layer
Data	Vana Data Portability Protocol (@opendatalabs/vana-sdk)
Storage	Upstash Redis, in-memory fallback
Signing	viem, EIP-191
Agents	Model Context Protocol (mcp-handler)
Abuse	ALTCHA proof of work, per-session rate limits
Tests	node:test, no framework

---

License

MIT, see LICENSE.

---

Acknowledgments

Built on Vana and its Data Portability Protocol. Connectors come from PDP-Connect/data-connectors. Brand glyphs are from Simple Icons and Font Awesome's free brand set, both inlined so the app makes no external request.