isitagentready

SkillWeb & browsing

Audit a repo against Cloudflare/isitagentready signals for AI agent readiness: robots.txt, llms.txt, Markdown negotiation, MCP/API catalogs, OAuth discovery, WebMCP, and browser-agent usability. Do NOT use for generic SEO or single-standard questions.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the isitagentready skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by jpcaparas/skills in skills/research/isitagentready/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Audit a live repository against Cloudflare's agent-readiness checks, then write a fix-ready markdown report packet grounded in runtime evidence and source inspection.

Decision Tree

What do you need to do?

  • Run the full audit and create the report packet

    • Read references/methodology.md
    • Run python3 scripts/create_report_packet.py --repo .
    • Then read references/signal-map.md
  • Understand the full Cloudflare signal inventory, score boundaries, and applicability rules

    • Read references/signal-map.md
    • Then read references/shared.md
  • Verify the live production site before source inspection

    • Read references/runtime-and-browser.md
    • If a browser skill is available, load {{ skill:agent-browser }}
  • Search the repository surgically for likely implementations, gaps, or deployment clues

    • Read references/repo-search-playbook.md
  • Write the final markdown report in the expected format

    • Read references/report-format.md
    • Use templates/agent-readiness-report.md
  • Avoid false positives, score inflation, or applicability mistakes

    • Read references/gotchas.md

Quick Reference

TaskUseOutcome
Create a report packet in the repo rootpython3 scripts/create_report_packet.py --repo . --url https://example.comCreates a timestamped folder with agent-readiness-report.md, sources.md, and metadata.json
Fetch the official isitagentready.com scan JSON for a deployed URLpython3 scripts/scan_site.py --url https://example.com --output ./isitagentready-report/scan-results.jsonSaves the raw scan JSON for evidence and score context
Run the audit workflow in the right orderreferences/methodology.mdBrowser/runtime check first, repo inspection second, report synthesis last
Map repo evidence to Cloudflare checksreferences/signal-map.md + references/repo-search-playbook.mdPer-signal pass/fail/partial/not-applicable assessment
Write the final reportreferences/report-format.md + templates/agent-readiness-report.mdDetailed markdown report with evidence, coverage, and remediation order
Validate the packaged skillFrom the skill directory: python3 scripts/validate.py .Structural validation
Test the packaged skillFrom the skill directory: python3 scripts/test_skill.py .Cross-reference, eval, and helper-script checks

Core Workflow

  1. Resolve the repository root first. This skill is meant to run inside repositories, not against arbitrary URLs in isolation.
  2. Ask one direct question when the production URL is missing and live verification is possible: What production URL should I audit for this repository?
  3. If a production URL exists and {{ skill:agent-browser }} is available, load it and complete the browser pass before opening source files. Wait for that pass to finish; use it to anchor the later code review.
  4. Create the local report packet with python3 scripts/create_report_packet.py --repo <repo> [--url <production-url>].
  5. If network access is available, fetch the official Cloudflare-style scan JSON with python3 scripts/scan_site.py --url <production-url> --output <report-dir>/scan-results.json.
  6. Inspect the repository for every scored and supporting signal. Search static files, route handlers, middleware, CDN config, edge config, and deployment transforms before concluding a signal is missing.
  7. Separate findings into four buckets:
    • Confirmed in production
    • Present in source but not yet proven deployed
    • Missing or contradicted by source/runtime evidence
    • Not applicable or currently neutral
  8. Write agent-readiness-report.md with concrete evidence, applicability reasoning, and a prioritized remediation order. Do not leave the report as a checklist dump.

Audit Deliverables

Produce these artifacts in the report packet:

  1. Executive summary — what materially limits agent readiness right now.
  2. Evidence sources — browser pass, official scan JSON, repo inspection, and unresolved areas.
  3. Official scan snapshot — only when a live URL was scanned. Include level, levelName, and nextLevel if present.
  4. Findings by category — discoverability, content, bot access control, protocol discovery, and commerce/supporting signals.
  5. Applicability decisions — why a signal is scored, neutral, or not applicable for this repo.
  6. Repository coverage map — which files, routes, configs, and deployment layers were inspected.
  7. Prioritized remediation — what to fix first, second, and later.

Analysis Rules

  1. Treat the Cloudflare runtime scan as authoritative for deployed behavior, but never let it replace repository inspection. Many failures are deployment drift, not missing code.
  2. Do not invent an official Cloudflare level from source code alone. Without a live scan, produce a repository assessment, not a claimed score.
  3. Ask for the production URL before the browser step. Do not silently guess from package metadata, DNS, or README files unless the user already stated the deployment target.
  4. Mark optional or neutral checks explicitly. A static content site should not be penalized for lacking commerce flows or OAuth protected resource metadata unless the product genuinely exposes those capabilities.
  5. Search deployment surfaces, not just app code. Headers and well-known routes are often emitted by CDN rules, edge middleware, or reverse proxies.
  6. Distinguish missing in source, present but unverified, and failing in production. Those are different remediation paths.
  7. When the repository has separate web and API apps, treat the user-supplied production URL as the authoritative runtime surface. Source-only backend OpenAPI or MCP config is not a deployed pass unless the public site exposes or links it.
  8. Keep user-facing evidence repo-relative. Cite paths such as apps/web/app/robots.ts, not absolute workstation paths.

Reading Guide

If the task is...Read
Full audit from repo to report packetreferences/methodology.md, then references/report-format.md
Understand Cloudflare's checks and how they map to codereferences/signal-map.md
Run browser-first/live-site verificationreferences/runtime-and-browser.md
Search the repo for likely implementations or deployment cluesreferences/repo-search-playbook.md
Avoid mis-scoring optional or neutral checksreferences/shared.md and references/gotchas.md

Verified External Baseline

This skill was grounded against current primary Cloudflare sources retrieved on April 19, 2026:

  • https://isitagentready.com/
  • https://blog.cloudflare.com/agent-readiness/ published April 17, 2026
  • https://isitagentready.com/.well-known/agent-skills/index.json
  • Representative SKILL.md documents published by isitagentready.com for robots.txt, sitemap, link headers, markdown negotiation, content signals, Web Bot Auth, API Catalog, OAuth discovery, OAuth Protected Resource metadata, MCP Server Card, A2A Agent Card, Agent Skills discovery, WebMCP, x402, UCP, and ACP

Use the references in this skill as the first source of truth, then verify live details when the target stack, deployment layer, or browser surface has changed.

Gotchas

  1. Ask for the production URL before the browser pass: this skill is explicitly browser-first when a live site and headless browser are available.
  2. Do not claim an official Cloudflare score without a live scan: code inspection alone is not the same as the deployed score returned by isitagentready.com.
  3. Commerce does not currently count toward the score: the April 17, 2026 Cloudflare blog states that x402, UCP, and ACP are checked but do not currently contribute to the score.
  4. llms.txt is adjacent, not the same as markdown negotiation: Cloudflare's default score checks markdown negotiation; llms.txt and llms-full.txt are useful supporting signals and may appear in customized scans.
  5. Headers often live outside the app: missing Link or Content-Type: text/markdown behavior may be implemented in CDN, edge, or proxy config rather than route code.
  6. A wildcard robots rule is insufficient for AI-specific bot rules: Cloudflare's ai-rules skill explicitly expects named AI crawler blocks.
  7. WebMCP must be verified in a rendered page: source search helps, but the check is effectively a browser/runtime behavior.

Helper Files

  • references/shared.md — shared terminology, scoring boundaries, and source baseline.
  • references/methodology.md — end-to-end audit workflow and evidence model.
  • references/signal-map.md — full Cloudflare signal inventory with applicability notes.
  • references/runtime-and-browser.md — production URL handling, browser-first workflow, and scan API usage.
  • references/repo-search-playbook.md — surgical search heuristics across frameworks and deployment layers.
  • references/report-format.md — the exact output packet layout and report contract.
  • references/gotchas.md — common traps and misreadings.
  • templates/agent-readiness-report.md — starting template for the markdown report.
  • scripts/create_report_packet.py — deterministic report-packet scaffolder.
  • scripts/scan_site.py — helper to fetch the live isitagentready.com scan JSON.
  • scripts/validate.py — structural validator for this skill.
  • scripts/test_skill.py — packaging, eval, and helper-script test runner.

Signals

GitHub stars
48
Forks
3
Last commit
Sep 2026

ahel review

  • K6low
    bundled executables the agent is told to run

Automated review, not a security audit. Ruleset v1+k2.

Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
isitagentready
Source
github.com/jpcaparas/skills