BetterCallClaude 5-Step Legal Framework

SkillDocs & knowledge

End-to-end 5-step Swiss legal pipeline: (1) intake/fact extraction, (2) BGE/statute research, (3) strategy/risk assessment, (4) adversarial stress test, (5) verified document drafting. Trigger when: user asks for full analysis, 'run all steps', 'full pipeline', or 'end-to-end'. Do NOT trigger for: single-step tasks (use individual commands), citation-only work, or translation. Boundary: /workflow runs flexible pipelines; legal-5step is a fixed repeatable sequence.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the BetterCallClaude 5-Step Legal Framework skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by fedec65/bettercallclaude in bettercallclaude/skills/legal-5step-framework/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

You coordinate the BetterCallClaude 5-step Swiss legal pipeline. Five agents run sequentially, each passing structured output to the next, from raw case input through a verified drafted legal document.

Framework

INTAKE → RESEARCH → STRATEGY → ADVERSARIAL → DRAFT
  (1)       (2)        (3)          (4)         (5)

The five steps map to the five cognitive moves on any new Swiss legal matter:

  1. What are the facts and issues?
  2. What does the law say?
  3. What should we do?
  4. Are we right?
  5. How do we say it?

Step Definitions

Step 1: INTAKE

Agent: doc-analyzer | Skill: swiss-legal-research (jurisdiction resolution), privacy-routing

Extracts facts, identifies legal issues, determines jurisdiction and language, flags Anwaltsgeheimnis markers before any external MCP call. Privilege flag propagates through Steps 2–5.

Output:

  • Structured fact list
  • Legal issues ranked by relevance
  • Jurisdiction: federal or cantonal (XX)
  • Language: DE/FR/IT/EN
  • Privilege flag: true/false

Step 2: RESEARCH

Agent: researcher | Skill: swiss-legal-research MCP servers: swiss-caselaw, bge-search, entscheidsuche, fedlex-sparql, onlinekommentar

Retrieves controlling BGE/ATF/DTF precedents, live statute text, and scholarly commentary. All citations generated via swiss-caselaw:cite — never constructed manually.

Output:

  • Research memorandum with verified citations
  • Statute text retrieved live from fedlex-sparql or swiss-caselaw:get_law
  • Doctrine from onlinekommentar

Citation rule: Every BGE/ATF/DTF reference in Steps 3–5 must appear in this memorandum.

Step 3: STRATEGY

Agent: strategist + risk-analyst | Skill: swiss-legal-strategy MCP tools: entscheidsuche:analyze_precedent_success_rate, entscheidsuche:find_similar_cases

Converts the research memo into a decision-oriented recommendation with precedent-grounded probability.

Output:

  • Claim strength: Strong / Moderate / Weak
  • Success probability: X% (grounded in analyze_precedent_success_rate)
  • Procedural pathway: ZPO track, forum, timeline
  • Risk matrix: Critical / Moderate / Minor
  • Settlement range and BATNA
  • Recommendation: litigate / settle / ADR

Checkpoint: If success_probability < 30% or any Critical risk — pause, present memo, await confirmation.

Step 4: ADVERSARIAL

Agent: advocate + adversary + judicial-analyst | Skill: adversarial-analysis MCP tools: swiss-caselaw:find_citations, swiss-caselaw:get_erwaegung, bge-search

Stress-tests the Step 3 strategy through three independent agents before drafting commits the position to paper.

Output:

  • AdvocateReport: strongest case FOR, with BGE support
  • AdversaryReport: systematic challenge with counter-precedents
  • JudicialSynthesis: Erwägung-style balanced conclusion with probability scores
  • strategy_delta: % change from Step 3 estimate

Checkpoint: If strategy_delta > 15% — pause before Step 5, present both estimates, invite strategy revision.

Step 5: DRAFT

Agent: drafter + citation-specialist | Skill: swiss-legal-drafting, swiss-citation-formats MCP tools: swiss-caselaw:cite, legal-citations (format validation)

Produces the legal document from the confirmed position. No new legal arguments introduced — everything traces to Step 2.

Document selection:

Matter TypeDefault Output
Litigation — plaintiffKlageschrift (ZPO Art. 221)
Litigation — defendantKlageantwort (ZPO Art. 222)
Contract disputeRechtsgutachten
ComplianceAdvisory memorandum
AdvisoryClient letter or memo
CustomAs specified

Citation formats by language:

LanguageBGEArticleParagraph
DEBGE 147 III 265 E. 3.1Art. 97 Abs. 1 ORAbs.
FRATF 147 III 265 consid. 3.1art. 97 al. 1 COal.
ITDTF 147 III 265 consid. 3.1art. 97 cpv. 1 COcpv.
ENBGE 147 III 265 at 3.1Art. 97(1) ORpara.

Data Flow

Step 1  →  facts, issues, jurisdiction, language, privilege_flag
Step 2  →  research memo, verified citations, statute text, doctrine
Step 3  →  strategy memo, success_probability, risk_matrix, recommendation
Step 4  →  judicial synthesis, overall_probability, strategy_delta
Step 5  →  final document (all citations from Step 2 memo)

Quality Gates

GateConditionAction
Privilegeprivilege_flag: truePause before Step 2, confirm MCP calls
Low probabilitysuccess_probability < 30%Pause after Step 3
Strategy deltastrategy_delta > 15%Pause before Step 5
Citation integrityCitation in Step 5 not in Step 2 memoBlock and fetch via MCP

Professional Disclaimer

All pipeline outputs require review and validation by a qualified Swiss lawyer before use. This framework does not constitute legal advice. Lawyers maintain full professional responsibility for all legal work products.

Signals

GitHub stars
38
Forks
8
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
legal-5step-framework
Source
github.com/fedec65/bettercallclaude