LLM Agents for Scientific Discovery Guide
SkillAI & modelsSurvey of LLM agents for biomedical scientific discovery
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
Then ask your AI: use the LLM Agents for Scientific Discovery Guide skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills in skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/deep-research/llm-scientific-discovery-guide/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Overview
A curated survey of how LLM-based agents are being applied to scientific discovery, with a focus on biomedical research. Covers hypothesis generation, experiment design, lab automation, literature synthesis, and multi-agent scientific collaboration. Tracks papers, tools, and frameworks across the spectrum from fully autonomous to human-in-the-loop systems.
Landscape
LLM Agents for Scientific Discovery
├── Hypothesis Generation
│ ├── Literature-based (gap identification)
│ ├── Data-driven (pattern discovery)
│ └── Analogy-based (cross-domain transfer)
├── Experiment Design
│ ├── Protocol generation
│ ├── Parameter optimization
│ └── Control selection
├── Lab Automation
│ ├── Robot control (self-driving labs)
│ ├── Equipment programming
│ └── Data collection orchestration
├── Analysis & Interpretation
│ ├── Statistical analysis
│ ├── Visualization
│ └── Result interpretation
└── Communication
├── Paper writing
├── Presentation generation
└── Peer review simulation
Key Systems
| System | Domain | Capability |
|---|---|---|
| AI Scientist | ML/AI | Full paper generation pipeline |
| ChemCrow | Chemistry | Tool-augmented chemical reasoning |
| Coscientist | Chemistry | Autonomous experiment execution |
| BioPlanner | Biology | Experiment protocol generation |
| MedAgent | Medicine | Clinical trial analysis |
| GenAgent | Genomics | Gene expression analysis |
| DrugAgent | Pharma | Drug interaction prediction |
Hypothesis Generation
# LLM-based hypothesis generation pattern
from scientific_agent import HypothesisGenerator
generator = HypothesisGenerator(
llm_provider="anthropic",
knowledge_sources=["pubmed", "openalex"],
)
hypotheses = generator.generate(
domain="oncology",
context="Recent findings show that gut microbiome "
"composition correlates with immunotherapy response",
constraints=[
"Must be testable in vitro",
"Should involve specific bacterial species",
"Must have measurable endpoints",
],
num_hypotheses=5,
)
for h in hypotheses:
print(f"\nHypothesis: {h.statement}")
print(f" Rationale: {h.rationale}")
print(f" Supporting evidence: {len(h.evidence)} papers")
print(f" Novelty score: {h.novelty_score:.2f}")
print(f" Feasibility: {h.feasibility}")
Self-Driving Lab Integration
# Agent controlling automated experiments
from scientific_agent import LabAgent
agent = LabAgent(
llm_provider="anthropic",
equipment=["plate_reader", "liquid_handler", "incubator"],
safety_constraints=["bsl2", "max_volume_1ml"],
)
# Design and run experiment
result = agent.run_experiment(
objective="Determine IC50 of compound X against cell line Y",
protocol_type="dose_response",
parameters={
"compound": "Compound_X",
"cell_line": "HeLa",
"concentrations": "serial_dilution",
"replicates": 3,
"readout": "cell_viability",
},
)
print(f"IC50: {result.ic50:.2f} uM")
print(f"R-squared: {result.r_squared:.3f}")
result.plot_dose_response("dose_response.pdf")
Multi-Agent Scientific Collaboration
# Agents with different scientific roles
from scientific_agent import ScientificTeam
team = ScientificTeam(
agents={
"PI": {"role": "research_director",
"expertise": "oncology"},
"Experimentalist": {"role": "experiment_design",
"expertise": "cell_biology"},
"Analyst": {"role": "data_analysis",
"expertise": "biostatistics"},
"Writer": {"role": "manuscript_writing",
"expertise": "scientific_communication"},
},
)
# Collaborative research cycle
project = team.start_project(
title="Microbiome-immunotherapy interaction study",
timeline_weeks=12,
)
# Agents collaborate: PI directs → Experimentalist designs →
# Analyst processes → Writer documents
Reading Roadmap
### Foundational Papers
1. "The AI Scientist" (Lu et al., 2024) — Fully automated ML research
2. "ChemCrow" (Bran et al., 2023) — Chemistry tool-use agent
3. "Coscientist" (Boiko et al., 2023) — Autonomous chemical research
4. "BioPlanner" (Biswas et al., 2024) — Biology protocol generation
### Surveys
5. "Scientific Discovery in the Age of AI" (Wang et al., 2023)
6. "Foundation Models for Science" (Bommasani et al., 2022)
7. "LLM Agents: A Survey" (multiple, 2024)
### Ethics & Limitations
8. "Dual-use concerns of AI in biology" (Sandbrink, 2023)
9. "Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas?" (Si et al., 2024)
Use Cases
- Literature mining: Automated hypothesis from research gaps
- Experiment automation: Self-driving lab orchestration
- Drug discovery: Multi-agent screening and optimization
- Research planning: Protocol and proposal generation
- Scientific writing: Paper drafting with verified claims
References
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 531
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
llm-scientific-discovery-guide- Source
- github.com/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills
github.com/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills
Related picks
Skill · wshobson
The pick for Pythonpython-pro
Skill · jeffallan
The pick for Pythongolden-pdf-ch
Skill · yusufkaraaslan
The pick for PDFpdf-co-automation
Skill · composio-community
The pick for PDFobsidian-markdown
Skill · agricidaniel
The pick for Markdownmarkdown-formatter
Skill · nvidia
The pick for Markdown