Implementation Notes
SkillDocs & knowledgeCapture implementation notes after code implementation and review/fix. Records design decisions, deviations, tradeoffs, and open questions to docs/issue#XXXX.html. Triggers on: /note-it, 记录笔记, implementation notes.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Implementation Notes skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by smallnest/goal-workflow in skills/note-it/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
After completing implementation and review/fix for an Issue, capture a running implementation notes file that documents how the implementation diverges from or interprets the spec.
Triggers
Use when:
- After
/goalimplementation and/review-itare both complete - User says "记录笔记", "implementation notes", "note-it", "/note-it"
- Before
/ship-it(as a final checkpoint) - Any time the user wants to capture design rationale
The Job
- Determine the Issue number from context (branch name,
/goaltarget, or user input) - Review the implementation against the Issue spec / PRD
- Generate an HTML notes file at
docs/issue#XXXX.html - Present a summary to the user
Notes Structure
The HTML file must cover these four categories. If a category has nothing to report, write "None" with a brief explanation.
1. Design Decisions
Choices made where the spec was ambiguous or silent:
- What was the ambiguity?
- What choice did you make?
- What was the rationale?
2. Deviations
Places where you intentionally departed from the spec:
- What did the spec say?
- What did you implement instead?
- Why was the deviation necessary or better?
3. Tradeoffs
Alternatives you considered and why you picked what you did:
- What were the viable alternatives?
- What were the pros/cons of each?
- Why did the chosen approach win?
4. Open Questions
Anything you'd want confirmed or revised:
- What assumption are you unsure about?
- What should the user verify?
- What might need follow-up?
Output
- Format: HTML
- Location:
docs/ - Filename:
issue#XXXX.html(where XXXX is the zero-padded Issue number, e.g.,issue#0042.html)
HTML Template
Use this exact HTML structure:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Implementation Notes — Issue #XXXX</title>
<style>
* { margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box; }
body {
font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', sans-serif;
background: #FAF9F6;
color: #1a1a1a;
padding: 2.5rem 2rem;
line-height: 1.7;
}
.container { max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; }
h1 { font-size: 1.375rem; font-weight: 700; margin-bottom: 0.25rem; }
.meta { color: #8B8680; font-size: 0.8125rem; margin-bottom: 2rem; }
h2 {
font-size: 1rem;
font-weight: 600;
margin-top: 2rem;
margin-bottom: 0.75rem;
padding-bottom: 0.375rem;
border-bottom: 1px solid #E8E4DE;
display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 0.5rem;
}
.dot {
width: 8px; height: 8px; border-radius: 50%; display: inline-block;
}
.dot.design { background: #5B8A72; }
.dot.deviation { background: #D97757; }
.dot.tradeoff { background: #4A6FA5; }
.dot.question { background: #D4A843; }
.item {
background: #FFFFFF;
border: 1px solid #E8E4DE;
border-radius: 8px;
padding: 1rem 1.25rem;
margin-bottom: 0.75rem;
box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.03);
}
.item h3 { font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; margin-bottom: 0.375rem; }
.item p { font-size: 0.8125rem; color: #4A4540; margin-bottom: 0.375rem; }
.label {
display: inline-block;
font-size: 0.6875rem;
font-weight: 500;
padding: 0.125rem 0.5rem;
border-radius: 4px;
margin-right: 0.375rem;
}
.label-design { background: #F5F8F6; color: #5B8A72; border: 1px solid #5B8A72; }
.label-deviation { background: #FFF5F0; color: #D97757; border: 1px solid #D97757; }
.label-tradeoff { background: #F0F4F8; color: #4A6FA5; border: 1px solid #4A6FA5; }
.label-question { background: #FDF8F0; color: #D4A843; border: 1px solid #D4A843; }
.none { color: #B0AAA4; font-style: italic; font-size: 0.8125rem; }
.footer {
text-align: center; margin-top: 2.5rem; color: #B0AAA4;
font-size: 0.6875rem;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="container">
<h1>Implementation Notes</h1>
<p class="meta">Issue <a href="{{ISSUE_URL}}">#{{ISSUE_NUMBER}}</a> — {{ISSUE_TITLE}} — {{DATE}}</p>
<h2><span class="dot design"></span> Design Decisions</h2>
<!-- One .item per decision, or .none if none -->
<h2><span class="dot deviation"></span> Deviations</h2>
<!-- One .item per deviation, or .none if none -->
<h2><span class="dot tradeoff"></span> Tradeoffs</h2>
<!-- One .item per tradeoff, or .none if none -->
<h2><span class="dot question"></span> Open Questions</h2>
<!-- One .item per question, or .none if none -->
<p class="footer">Generated by goal-workflow /note-it</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Example Item
<div class="item">
<h3><span class="label label-design">Decision</span> Used interface-based polymorphism instead of switch</h3>
<p><strong>Ambiguity:</strong> The spec said "handle different types" without specifying how.</p>
<p><strong>Choice:</strong> Defined a <code>Handler</code> interface with per-type implementations.</p>
<p><strong>Rationale:</strong> Adding new types requires no changes to existing code (Open/Closed Principle). A switch would grow unboundedly.</p>
</div>
How to Determine the Issue Number
- If the user provides it directly (e.g.,
/note-it #42), use it - If on a branch named
feat/issue-42-*orfix/issue-42-*, extract42 - If the last
/goaltarget was#42, use42 - Otherwise, ask the user: "Which Issue number should I use for the notes file?"
Edge Cases
| Scenario | Handling |
|---|---|
| No Issue number found | Ask the user to specify |
docs/ directory does not exist | Auto-create it |
| Notes file already exists for this Issue | Ask: "Update existing notes or overwrite?" — default to update (append new items) |
| No deviations or open questions | Write "None — implementation followed the spec as written." |
| Spec/PRD file not found | Note in Open Questions: "No PRD found at tasks/prd-*.md — verify against original requirements." |
Checklist
Before saving:
- Issue number identified
- All four categories reviewed (even if some are "None")
- Design decisions explain rationale, not just what was done
- Deviations clearly contrast spec vs implementation
- Tradeoffs mention specific alternatives considered
- Open questions are actionable (user can answer yes/no or give direction)
- HTML is well-formed and renders correctly
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 277
- Forks
- 42
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
note-it- Source
- github.com/smallnest/goal-workflow