Roadmap Review Checks

SkillDev tools

Roadmap-specific validation checks for architecture reviews. Load when reviewing roadmaps for implementation readiness.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Roadmap Review Checks skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by nwave-ai/nwave in nWave/skills/nw-roadmap-review-checks/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Six mandatory checks for every roadmap review. Each produces a finding block.

Check 1: External Validity

Verify completing all steps produces an INVOCABLE feature, not just existing code.

Criteria: at least one step targets entry point integration | acceptance tests invoke through driving ports | clear user invocation path after completion

Severity: BLOCKER if no integration step or invocation path. HIGH if tests at wrong boundary.

EXTERNAL VALIDITY CHECK: PASSED|FAILED

Issue: {missing wiring}
Consequence: {what happens without fix}
Required Action: {integration step to add}

Check 2: AC Implementation Coupling

Scan AC for implementation details locking crafter into predetermined structure.

Detection: underscore-prefixed identifiers | method signatures with params | internal class references | specific return types

Severity: HIGH. Flag each coupled AC with rewrite.

  • Coupled: _install_des_module() copies src/des/
  • Rewritten: DES module importable from installation target after install

Rationale: AC = WHAT (observable behavior), never HOW (internal structure). Crafter decides during GREEN + REFACTOR.

Check 3: Step Decomposition Ratio

Calculation: implementation steps / unique production files in files_to_modify

Thresholds: acceptable <= 2.0 | warning 2.0-2.5 | reject > 2.5

Identical pattern check: 3+ steps with identical AC differing by substitution -> require batching.

Check 4: Implementation Code in Roadmap

Verify no implementation code. BLOCKER.

Detection: code snippets/algorithms in descriptions | method implementations in AC | pseudocode/logic | variable names, loops, conditionals

Architect defines WHAT; crafter decides HOW. Roadmap code prevents better solutions via TDD.

Check 5: Roadmap Concision and Precision

Quantitative thresholds: total words 500 (1-3 steps) / 1500 (4-8) / 3000 (9-15) | step description max 50 words | AC max 5 per step, 30 words each | notes max 100 words

Verbosity detection: multi-sentence blocks -> bullets | qualifiers (comprehensive, robust) -> delete | motivational language -> delete | redundancy -> state once | tutorials -> delete, assume expertise

Precision: every AC single interpretation | testable outcome | business over technical jargon

Severity: BLOCKER if word count exceeds threshold.

Check 6: Unit Test Boundary Validation

Verify unit tests respect hexagonal boundaries.

Rules: invoke through driving ports only | no domain entity unit tests | behavior focus | never import internal/private modules

  • Wrong: Tests verify TemplateValidator._validate_schema() handles edge cases
  • Right: When invalid template provided to render_prompt(), ValidationError raised with clear message

Severity: HIGH.

Signals

GitHub stars
610
Forks
64
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
nw-roadmap-review-checks
Source
github.com/nwave-ai/nwave