story: e45s29

SkillFiles & storage

Have your agent plan Claude skill projects by turning epic scopes into small, verifiable implementation steps.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.

Then ask your AI: use the story: e45s29 skill

About this skill

PLANNING SPINE STEP 3 of 3, Plan the work: write detailed implementation tasks into the active epic capsule (specs/epics/eNN-slug/). Produces countable-story-format .md specs and runnable -tasks.yaml files. Use after slice-tasks (step 2). Not a substitute for scope-work (step 1) or slice-tasks (ste

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by danielvm-git/bigpowers in skills/plan-work/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Plan Work

Spine position: Step 3 — scope-work → slice-tasks → plan-work.

Produce a detailed, verifiable implementation plan in the active epic capsule directory (specs/epics/eNN-slug/). Output: a story spec .md file (countable-story-format) and a decoupled eNNsYY-tasks.yaml with runnable verify commands. "I think it works" is not a step.

HARD GATE — Do NOT proceed with a plan until the task's success criteria are clear. If success is ambiguous, convert the task into "step → verify: <cmd>" pairs here before writing tasks — every task ships a runnable verify: or the plan is not done.

RECURSIVE DISCIPLINE — This lifecycle applies to EVERY task, including updating these skills. Never skip planning because a task is "meta" or "just documentation."

Pre-flight

Read: release-plan.yaml, product/SCOPE_LATEST.yaml, active epics/<capsule>/epic.yaml, tech-architecture/tech-stack.md, product/GLOSSARY_LATEST.yaml.

ZOOM-OUT MANDATE (v1.17.0) — If modifying an existing module: (1) State the module's purpose. (2) Name its callers. (3) List its contracts. Cannot answer all three? Stop — scope is misunderstood.

If this plan touches an existing module, run assess-impact first to understand blast radius.

DISCOVERY MANDATE (v1.18.0) — For external API integration, verify the API signature via local docs or search and quote at least one technical detail in the step's context.

MULTIPLE INTERPRETATIONS (HARD GATE) — If the task admits ≥2 valid interpretations, list them and get a user decision before drafting any steps.

COMPLEXITY PUSHBACK (HARD GATE) — Every new abstraction MUST include a one-sentence "Reason for Depth." If it can't be filled non-trivially, the abstraction is premature — use inline code instead.

SLOPCHECK (HARD GATE) — For every external package, tag it [OK], [SUS], or [SLOP]. [SUS]/[SLOP] require human approval before execution.

Invocation modes

  • Default: full plan with zoom-out mandate, impact assessment, slopcheck
  • --fast: Skip zoom-out and impact assessment. Use for tasks under 3 BCPs with no module interface changes.

Process

Timing: bash scripts/bp-timing.sh start plan-work at invocation; bash scripts/bp-timing.sh end plan-work before handoff.

  1. Explore — Use Explore subagent to understand affected modules, existing test patterns, similar prior art, and dependencies.

  2. Draft steps — Break implementation into the smallest possible steps where each step leaves the codebase working, has one observable outcome, and can be verified with a single command. Red-flag check: name any rationalization you caught before moving to step 3.

  3. Write capsule story spec + tasks — Output two files inside the active epic capsule. See REFERENCE.md for file formats and the plan-template. Each task MUST include a risk: field (P0 | P1 | P2 | P3) based on BCP + story type heuristics (see REFERENCE.md). If a test plan artifact (specs/tech-architecture/eNN-TEST_PLAN_LATEST.md) exists, read it and inherit its P0/P1 risk classifications and scenario IDs (SC-eNNsYY-P0-NN). Each task optionally includes a security: field (none / low / medium / high) sourced from the epic's specs/security/epics/<id>/THREAT_MODEL.md. Tasks with security: medium or security: high MUST include "no new security findings in affected paths" in their verify steps. Each task should also include an allure: block to drive test reporting: severity: maps risk to Allure severity (P0→critical, P1→high, P2→normal, P3→minor), and categories: is a list of relevant tags like "Security Review", wave names, or test categories (see REFERENCE.md for the full template).

    Requirement delta tags (e45s29): When a story modifies existing behavior, the story spec § Requirements MUST use OpenSpec-style delta tags with mandatory before/after content:

    TagWhenRequired content
    ADDEDNew requirementFull requirement text
    MODIFIEDChanged behaviorBefore: prior behavior · After: new behavior
    REMOVEDRetired requirementBefore: what existed · After: (removed) + rationale
    RENAMEDID or title change onlyBefore: old ID/title · After: new ID/title

    Net-new stories (greenfield) use ADDED only. MODIFIED/REMOVED/RENAMED without before/after blocks fail the plan-work gate.

  4. Verify step format — Every step MUST follow: N. <What to do> → verify: <runnable command>. See REFERENCE.md for good/bad examples.

4a. Cross-artifact consistency pass (HARD GATE — e45s04) — Before handoff, run:

bash scripts/lib/plan-consistency-check.sh specs/epics/<capsule>/

Print CRITICAL / HIGH / MED findings. CRITICAL or HIGH blocks code generation — fix capsule artifacts first. MED requires explicit user acknowledgment.

4b. tasks.yaml failing ledger (e45s06) — Every new task entry starts with status: failing. Only flip to status: passing after its verify: command exits 0 during develop-tdd or verify-work. Never pre-mark passing at plan time.

  1. Review with user — Confirm step order, granularity, and that verify commands are runnable in this project.

Lifecycle Gates (e45s09)

GateWhenPass condition
Pre-ImplementationBefore kickoff-branch / first RED commitRoot-cause stated for bugs; assess-impact done for module changes; plan-consistency-check PASS
ValidationStory marked doneAll tasks status: passing; verify evidence in specs/verifications/
Reopen-don't-refileRegression on shipped storyReopen existing story/bug — do not create duplicate capsule entries

After writing capsule tasks, suggest kickoff-branch (if not already on a feature branch) then build-epic, execute-plan, or develop-tdd.

Verify

→ verify: test -f scripts/lib/plan-consistency-check.sh && EPIC=$(ls -d specs/epics/*/ 2>/dev/null | grep -v archive | sort | head -1) && test -n "$EPIC" && bash scripts/lib/plan-consistency-check.sh "$EPIC" >/dev/null 2>&1

Handoff

Gate: READY -> next: kickoff-branch Writes: state.yaml handoff.next_skill = kickoff-branch

Signals

GitHub stars
248
Forks
19
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
plan-work
Source
github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowers