ARB Review — Architecture Review Board Presentation

SkillDocs & knowledge

Generate an Architecture Review Board (ARB) presentation in Coco Inc's standard 11-slide format. Use when someone asks to "create an ARB deck", "architecture review presentation", "prepare for architecture review board", "ARB slides", or needs to present a product/platform architecture for sign-off. Reads PRD, architecture maps, and project memory to pre-fill technical content. Produces a self-contained HTML slide deck.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the ARB Review — Architecture Review Board Presentation skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by coco-research/coco in skills/arb-review/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Purpose

Generates an 11-slide architecture review presentation following Coco Inc's standard ARB format. Used when a product needs architecture sign-off for a new instance, major integration, platform migration, or periodic review.

Process

Step 1: Read Context

Required sources (read all that exist):

  • CLAUDE.local.md — project context, architecture decisions, stakeholders, ProdID
  • PRD/*.html or PRD/*.md — requirements, NFRs, technical considerations, integrations, data model
  • Architecture/ or *Architecture*.html — existing diagrams, maps

Optional sources:

  • .sync-watch.json — project name
  • Operational/DR-Plan*.html — RTO/RPO targets (for slide 8)
  • Data/Stakeholder-Directory.* — presenter and audience names

Step 2: Ask Discovery Questions

Only ask what cannot be inferred from context:

  1. Review type? New Product / Major Change / Periodic Review / Decommission
  2. Data classification? Purple / Red / Yellow / Green (if not in PRD)
  3. Audience? Firm-level ARB / Department-level / Technical review
  4. Known constraints or mandates? (e.g., "must use existing Snowflake instance")
  5. Decision you need? Approve / Approve-with-conditions / Defer — what specifically?

Step 3: Generate 11-Slide Deck

Output: Presentations/ARB-Review-{ProductName}-{Date}.html

Self-contained HTML file with:

  • System fonts (no CDN dependencies)
  • Click/keyboard navigation between slides
  • Print CSS for PDF export
  • Mermaid.js (CDN) for architecture diagrams

Slide structure — see references/arb-format.md for section details:

#SlideKey Content
1Title & ContextProduct name, ProdID, review type, date, presenters
2Business ContextProblem statement, strategic alignment, sponsor
3Current StateAS-IS architecture (Mermaid diagram), pain points
4Proposed ArchitectureTO-BE architecture (Mermaid diagram), what changes
5Data ArchitectureData classification, flows, retention, residency
6Security & AccessAuthN/AuthZ, RBAC, encryption, CUECs
7Integration PointsUpstream/downstream, protocols, error handling
8NFRs & SLAsPerformance, availability, RTO/RPO, scalability
9Risk AssessmentArchitecture risks, mitigations, residual acceptance
10Implementation PlanPhases, timeline, rollback, blast radius
11Decision RequestWhat you need from the board, options, recommendation

Step 4: Populate Content

For each slide, pull from project sources:

  • Slide 1: Product name and ProdID from CLAUDE.local.md. Review type from Step 2. Presenters from stakeholder directory.
  • Slides 3-4: Generate Mermaid diagrams from PRD architecture section and Architecture maps. If current-state diagram exists, use it. If not, build from PRD integrations and technical considerations.
  • Slide 5: Data classification from PRD or discovery. Data flows from integrations section. Retention from NFRs.
  • Slide 6: RBAC from PRD. CUECs from operationalization section. SSO/AuthN from technical considerations.
  • Slide 7: Extract all integration points from PRD. Add protocol, frequency, error handling.
  • Slide 8: Pull NFRs directly from PRD table. RTO/RPO from DR plan if it exists.
  • Slide 9: Pull risks from PRD risk section. Add architecture-specific risks.
  • Slide 10: Pull timeline from PRD. Add rollback strategy.
  • Slide 11: Decision request from Step 2. Frame options with recommendation.

Step 5: Present for Review

Show the deck outline with key content per slide. Ask:

  • "Does this cover the right scope?"
  • "Any slides that need different emphasis?"
  • "Who are the presenters for slide 1?"

Apply feedback, then write the file.

Critical Rules

  1. Mermaid diagrams are mandatory for slides 3 and 4. Architecture reviews without diagrams fail.
  2. Data classification must be explicit. If unknown, mark as "TBD — requires classification" in red. Never assume.
  3. Slide 11 must have a clear ask. Not "please review" but "approve this architecture for production deployment" or "approve with condition: validate cascading before Phase 2."
  4. No implementation details on architecture slides. Show components, interfaces, and data flows — not code, configs, or step-by-step procedures.
  5. Keep it to 11 slides. If more content is needed, add appendix slides clearly labeled "APPENDIX" after slide 11.

Signals

GitHub stars
220
Forks
11
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
pmstudio-arb
Source
github.com/coco-research/coco