Feedback Loop Setup
SkillDev toolsEstablish channels and processes for capturing and processing post-launch feedback during PRD v0.9 Go-to-Market. Triggers on requests to set up feedback systems, capture user input, or when user asks "how do we collect feedback?", "feedback loop", "user research", "post-launch feedback", "customer feedback", "NPS", "voice of customer". Outputs CFD- entries specialized for post-launch feedback capture.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Feedback Loop Setup skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by mattgierhart/prd-driven-context-engineering in .claude/skills/prd-v09-feedback-loop-setup/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Position in workflow: v0.9 Launch Metrics → v0.9 Feedback Loop Setup → v1.0 Market Adoption
Execution Mode
Default is standard. See .claude/rules/08-skill-execution-modes.md for selection logic.
| Mode | What this skill produces |
|---|---|
| quick | 1–2 channels (in-app + support); basic triage workflow |
| standard | 3–4 channels; full processing workflow + sentiment tracking + SLAs |
| deep | All channels + closed-loop tracking + voice-of-customer synthesis + escalation rules |
Consumes
This skill requires prior work from v0.9 Launch Metrics and v0.1-v0.8:
- GTM-* launch channels (from v0.9 GTM Strategy) — Active launch channels (Product Hunt, email, paid ads, etc.) become feedback sources; GTM- messaging and channels inform where feedback will arrive
- MON-* monitoring dashboards and alerts (from v0.8 Monitoring Setup) — MON- thresholds (latency, error rate, performance) define what qualifies as critical feedback; monitoring alerts can trigger deep-dive user research
- KPI-* launch targets and baselines (from v0.9 Launch Metrics) — KPI- thresholds (Day 1/7/30/90 targets) inform feedback urgency and trigger investigation when below target; baseline performance metrics (p95 latency, error rate, conversion rate) provide context for performance feedback
- CFD-* baseline entries (from v0.1-v0.4) — Baseline customer feedback hypotheses (user pain points, value propositions, competitive alternatives) become validation targets post-launch; feedback loop confirms or contradicts CFD- assumptions
- PER-* personas (from v0.4 Persona Definition) — Persona segments (PER-001 Startup Founder, PER-002 Team Lead) enable feedback categorization by user type and prioritization by persona importance
This skill assumes v0.9 Launch Metrics is live with KPI- thresholds established, GTM- channels are active, and MON- dashboards are displaying baseline metrics.
Produces
This skill creates/updates:
- CFD-* post-launch feedback entries (feedback capture specifications, channel/type-based) — Every piece of user feedback becomes a CFD- entry with source, sentiment, impact, and action taken; traced to GTM- channels and user personas
- Feedback processing workflow/matrix — Triage → Categorization → Prioritization → Action mapping showing how feedback flows from capture to ID updates (CFD- → FEA-/BR-/RISK- → EPIC-)
- CFD-* update entries — CFD- entries updated with resolution status, outcome, and follow-up evidence, enabling confidence progression (initial feedback → validated pattern → implemented action → confirmed outcome)
All CFD-* post-launch entries are evidential feedback records, not confidence-based themselves but supporting confidence scoring on OTHER IDs:
- Timestamped (when feedback was received, to track trends and velocity)
- Sourced (channel, user segment, user ID if available for follow-up)
- Categorized (UX | Performance | Feature Gap | Bug | Praise | Confusion for trend analysis)
- Prioritized (Critical/High/Medium/Low with impact justification)
- Actionable (every CFD- either triggers ID creation/update or documents "won't fix" decision)
- Closed-loop (user receives response and can verify resolution)
Example CFD- post-launch entries:
CFD-101: "Can't figure out how to export my data"
Type: Support Ticket
Source: Intercom (GTM-002 email → user support request)
Date: 2025-01-15
User Segment: PER-001 (Startup Founder)
Verbatim: "I've been using the tool for a week and I can't find any way to export my work."
Processed:
Category: Feature Gap
Sentiment: Frustrated
Priority: High
Frequency: Repeated (3rd request this week)
Impact Assessment:
Users Affected: ~50 (based on support volume)
KPI Impact: KPI-104 (D7 Retention) — export needed for team use case
Revenue Risk: High — multiple users mentioned "dealbreaker"
Action:
Response: "Thanks for reaching out! Export is on our roadmap."
Internal Action: Escalated to product team, added to backlog
Linked IDs: FEA-025 (Export Feature) created, EPIC-05 updated
Status: In Progress
Resolution:
Outcome: FEA-025 shipped in v1.2
Date: 2025-02-01
Follow-up: Emailed user with release notes
Linked IDs: GTM-002 (email channel source), PER-001 (persona), KPI-104 (affected metric), FEA-025 (action taken), EPIC-05 (implementation)
---
CFD-102: NPS Detractor Response
Type: NPS Response
Source: In-App Survey (MON-005 trigger)
Date: 2025-01-18
User Segment: PER-002 (Team Lead)
Verbatim: "Score: 4. Too slow. Takes forever to load projects and I give up waiting."
Processed:
Category: Performance
Sentiment: Negative
Priority: Critical
Frequency: Trending (NPS dropped 10 points this week)
Impact Assessment:
Users Affected: ~200 (20% of NPS responses mention speed)
KPI Impact: KPI-103 (Activation), KPI-104 (Retention) — both trending down
Revenue Risk: High — performance is activation blocker
Action:
Response: N/A (anonymous survey)
Internal Action: Performance spike investigation started (MON-001 latency breach detected)
Linked IDs: RISK-012 (Performance Degradation) escalated, EPIC-06 prioritized for optimization
Status: In Progress
Resolution:
Outcome: Database query optimization deployed, latency restored to baseline
Date: 2025-01-22
Follow-up: Next NPS cycle (Day 30) will measure improvement
Linked IDs: MON-005 (dashboard source), PER-002, KPI-103, KPI-104, MON-001 (latency baseline), RISK-012, EPIC-06
---
CFD-103: Community Feature Request (Dark Mode)
Type: Community Post
Source: Discord #feature-requests (GTM-005 community channel)
Date: 2025-01-20
User Segment: Power Users (multiple PER-)
Verbatim: "Thread: 47 messages discussing dark mode. Summary: 15 unique users requesting."
Processed:
Category: Feature Gap
Sentiment: Neutral (constructive)
Priority: Medium
Frequency: Repeated (ongoing, 15 users vocal)
Impact Assessment:
Users Affected: 15+ vocal, likely more silent
KPI Impact: Minor — nice-to-have, not activation blocker; may reduce churn for night users
Revenue Risk: Low
Action:
Response: Community manager acknowledged, added to public roadmap
Internal Action: Added to backlog as P2 feature
Linked IDs: FEA-030 (Dark Mode) created, posted on public roadmap
Status: Acknowledged
Resolution:
Outcome: Pending — scheduled for Q2 release
Date: N/A
Follow-up: Posted on public roadmap
Linked IDs: GTM-005 (community channel), PER-* (multiple personas), FEA-030, public roadmap
Feedback → ID Flow
Each CFD- post-launch entry triggers cascading updates:
| Feedback Type | Creates/Updates | Confidence Impact | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feature Request | FEA-, BR-FEA- | Increases FEA- confidence (user interview → beta validation) | CFD-101 (export request, 3rd this week) → FEA-025 (confidence: 2→3, source: support-requests-2025-01) |
| Performance Complaint | MON- threshold, RISK- escalation | Triggers MON- investigation; may update RISK- severity | CFD-102 (slow, 20% mention) → MON-001 threshold validation → RISK-012 escalation |
| UX Confusion | SCR-, UJ- refinement | Informs screen redesign without changing foundational journey | "Can't find export" → SCR-005 (export button placement) update |
| Bug Report | RISK- or direct fix | RISK- frequency increases → triggers prioritization | Critical bugs → P0 RISK- entry |
| Praise/Testimonial | CFD- (evidence), GTM- (social proof) | Confirms CFD- hypothesis; can become GTM- case study | "Love this feature!" → CFD- entry → GTM-015 (testimonial) |
This feedback loop enables evidence-driven iteration: feedback patterns → ID updates → implementation → launch validation → next iteration.
Downstream Connections
| Consumer | What It Uses | Example |
|---|---|---|
| v1.0 Market Adoption Planning | CFD- feedback patterns inform roadmap | 10× CFD- export requests → FEA-025 move to P1 |
| Product Development | CFD- → FEA-, BR- updates feed next EPIC | CFD-102 performance complaints → EPIC-06 optimization prioritized |
| Sales/Marketing | CFD- testimonials become GTM assets | CFD-103 community enthusiasm → GTM-015 case study |
| Support Team | CFD- patterns become FAQ and onboarding | Repeated "can't export" → FAQ article |
| Risk Management | CFD- negative trends escalate RISK- | NPS dropping → RISK-012 escalation |
| KPI Accountability | CFD- confirms KPI- achievement | KPI-104 (D7 Retention) gaps trigger CFD- investigation |
Purpose
Establish systematic channels for capturing, processing, and acting on post-launch user feedback—closing the loop between user experience and product iteration.
Core Concept: Feedback as Fuel
Feedback is not a task to complete—it is fuel for iteration. Every piece of feedback should flow into the ID graph, informing future CFD-, BR-, FEA-, or RISK- entries. If feedback sits in a spreadsheet, it's not feedback—it's noise.
Feedback Channels
| Channel | Type | Best For | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-App | Prompted | Contextual reactions | Real-time |
| Support | Reactive | Issues, requests | <24h |
| Community | Proactive | Discussion, ideas | Ongoing |
| Surveys | Scheduled | Structured data | Periodic |
| Analytics | Passive | Behavior signals | Continuous |
Execution
-
Map feedback touchpoints
- Where do users already reach out?
- Where should we actively prompt?
- What channels from GTM- are active?
-
Design feedback capture
- In-app widgets (NPS, CSAT, feature requests)
- Support ticket taxonomy
- Community moderation workflow
- Survey schedule and instruments
-
Define processing workflow
- Who triages incoming feedback?
- How does it become CFD- entries?
- What triggers action?
-
Establish feedback → ID flow
- Feedback → CFD-
- CFD- → BR-, FEA-, RISK- updates
- Updates → EPIC- for implementation
-
Set up monitoring
- Volume metrics
- Sentiment tracking
- Response time SLAs
-
Create CFD- entries for post-launch feedback
CFD- Output Template (Post-Launch Feedback)
CFD-XXX: [Feedback Title]
Type: [Support Ticket | Feature Request | Bug Report | NPS Response | Community Post | Survey Response]
Source: [Intercom | Zendesk | Discord | In-App | Email | Twitter]
Date: [When received]
User Segment: [PER-XXX if identifiable]
Verbatim: "[Exact user quote or description]"
Processed:
Category: [UX | Performance | Feature Gap | Bug | Praise | Confusion]
Sentiment: [Positive | Neutral | Negative | Frustrated]
Priority: [Critical | High | Medium | Low]
Frequency: [One-off | Repeated | Trending]
Impact Assessment:
Users Affected: [Count or estimate]
KPI Impact: [KPI-XXX affected if applicable]
Revenue Risk: [High | Medium | Low | None]
Action:
Response: [How we responded to user]
Internal Action: [What we're doing about it]
Linked IDs: [BR-XXX, FEA-XXX, RISK-XXX created/updated]
Status: [New | Acknowledged | In Progress | Resolved | Won't Fix]
Resolution:
Outcome: [What happened]
Date: [When resolved]
Follow-up: [Did we close the loop with user?]
Note: See Produces section above for detailed CFD- examples with full traceability links.
Feedback Collection Methods
In-App Feedback
| Method | When to Use | Question |
|---|---|---|
| NPS | After activation, monthly | "How likely to recommend?" (0-10) |
| CSAT | After support interaction | "How satisfied?" (1-5) |
| CES | After key action | "How easy was this?" (1-7) |
| Feature Request | Persistent widget | "What's missing?" |
| Bug Report | Error states | "What went wrong?" |
Survey Cadence
| Survey | Frequency | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| NPS | Monthly | Overall sentiment tracking |
| Onboarding Exit | After churn signal | Why didn't they activate? |
| Feature Satisfaction | Post-release | Did this solve the problem? |
| Annual Deep Dive | Yearly | Strategic feedback |
Passive Signals
| Signal | What It Indicates | Action Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Rage clicks | Frustration | UX investigation |
| Drop-off | Confusion or friction | Funnel analysis |
| Feature abandonment | Poor value delivery | User interview |
| Error rates | Technical issues | Bug investigation |
Feedback Processing Workflow
CAPTURE → TRIAGE → CATEGORIZE → PRIORITIZE → ACTION → CLOSE LOOP
1. CAPTURE
- All channels → central inbox
2. TRIAGE (Daily)
- Critical: <4h response
- High: <24h response
- Medium/Low: Weekly review
3. CATEGORIZE
- Apply CFD- template
- Link to existing IDs
4. PRIORITIZE
- Frequency × Impact × Revenue Risk
- Weekly prioritization meeting
5. ACTION
- Create/update IDs (BR-, FEA-, RISK-)
- Add to EPIC- backlog
- Communicate internally
6. CLOSE LOOP
- Respond to user
- Update CFD- status
- Verify resolution
Sentiment Monitoring
Track aggregate sentiment over time:
| Metric | Calculation | Target |
|---|---|---|
| NPS | % Promoters - % Detractors | >30 |
| CSAT | % Satisfied (4-5) | >80% |
| Support Volume | Tickets per 100 users | <5 |
| Response Time | Median first response | <4h |
| Resolution Rate | % resolved within SLA | >90% |
Anti-Patterns
| Pattern | Signal | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Feedback graveyard | Collect but never act | Mandate weekly triage meeting |
| Only negative | No positive feedback captured | Celebrate wins, capture praise |
| No closing loop | Users never hear back | Require follow-up on High+ priority |
| Volume without insight | "We got 500 tickets" | Categorize and trend analysis |
| Building in silence | Ship features, don't validate | Post-release surveys |
| Anecdote-driven | "One user said..." | Require frequency data |
Quality Gates
Before proceeding to v1.0 Market Adoption:
- All feedback channels identified and configured
- In-app feedback widgets deployed
- Support ticket taxonomy defined
- Community monitoring active
- Processing workflow documented and assigned
- Feedback → ID flow established
- Sentiment metrics baselined
Detailed References
- Feedback channel setup: See
references/channel-setup.md - CFD- post-launch template: See
assets/cfd-feedback-template.md - Survey question bank: See
references/survey-questions.md - Sentiment analysis guide: See
references/sentiment-guide.md
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 182
- Forks
- 10
- Last commit
- Aug 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
prd-v09-feedback-loop-setup- Source
- github.com/mattgierhart/prd-driven-context-engineering