preflight
SkillDev toolsPre-commit quality gate that catches 'almost right' code. Use when about to commit — auto-fires before commit to validate logic correctness, error handling, regressions, and completeness. Goes beyond linting.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the preflight skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by rune-kit/rune in skills/preflight/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Purpose
Pre-commit quality gate that catches "almost right" code — the kind that compiles and passes linting but has logic errors, missing error handling, or incomplete implementations. Goes beyond static analysis to check data flow, edge cases, async correctness, and regression impact. The last defense before code enters the repository.
Triggers
- Called automatically by
cookbefore commit phase - Called by
fixafter applying fixes (verify fix quality) /rune preflight— manual quality check- Auto-trigger: when staged changes exceed 100 LOC
Calls (outbound)
scout(L2): find code affected by changes (dependency tracing)sentinel(L2): security sub-check on changed fileshallucination-guard(L3): verify imports and API references existtest(L2): run test suite as pre-commit check
Called By (inbound)
cook(L1): before commit phase — mandatory gate
Check Categories
LOGIC — data flow errors, edge case misses, async bugs
ERROR — missing try/catch, bare catches, unhelpful error messages
REGRESSION — untested impact zones, breaking changes to public API
COMPLETE — missing validation, missing loading states, missing tests
SECURITY — delegated to sentinel
IMPORTS — delegated to hallucination-guard
Executable Steps
Stage A — Spec Compliance (Plan vs Diff)
Before checking code quality, verify the code matches what was planned.
Use Bash to get the diff: git diff --cached (staged) or git diff HEAD (all changes).
Use Read to load the approved plan from the calling skill (cook passes plan context).
Check each plan phase against the diff:
| Plan says... | Diff shows... | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| "Add function X to file Y" | Function X exists in file Y | PASS |
| "Add function X to file Y" | Function X missing | BLOCK — incomplete implementation |
| "Modify function Z" | Function Z untouched | BLOCK — planned change not applied |
| Nothing about file W | File W modified | WARN — out-of-scope change (scope creep) |
Output: List of plan-vs-diff mismatches. Any missing planned change = BLOCK. Any unplanned change = WARN.
If no plan is available (manual preflight invocation), skip Stage A and proceed to Step 1.
Step 1 — Logic Review
Use Read to load each changed file. For every modified function or method:
- Trace the data flow from input to output. Identify where a
null,undefined, empty array, or 0 value would cause a runtime error or wrong result. - Check async/await: every
asyncfunction that calls an async operation mustawaitit. Identify missingawaitthat would cause race conditions or unhandled promise rejections. - Check boundary conditions: off-by-one in loops, array index out of bounds, division by zero.
- Check type coercions: implicit
==comparisons that could produce wrong results, string-to-number conversions without validation.
Common patterns to flag:
// BAD — missing await (race condition)
async function processOrder(orderId: string) {
const order = db.orders.findById(orderId); // order is a Promise, not a value
return calculateTotal(order.items); // crashes: order.items is undefined
}
// GOOD
async function processOrder(orderId: string) {
const order = await db.orders.findById(orderId);
return calculateTotal(order.items);
}
// BAD — sequential independent I/O
const user = await fetchUser(id);
const permissions = await fetchPermissions(id); // waits unnecessarily
// GOOD — parallel
const [user, permissions] = await Promise.all([fetchUser(id), fetchPermissions(id)]);
Flag each issue with: file path, a verbatim evidence snippet copied from the file, category (null-deref | missing-await | off-by-one | type-coerce), and a one-line description. Record the snippet, not a line number — Step 6's Anchor Pass resolves the line with Grep.
Step 2 — Error Handling
For every changed file, verify:
- Every
asyncfunction has atry/catchblock OR the caller explicitly handles the rejected promise. - No bare
catch(e) {}orexcept: pass— every catch must log or rethrow with context. - Every
fetch/ HTTP client call checks the response status before consuming the body. - Error messages are user-friendly: no raw stack traces, no internal variable names exposed to the client.
- API route handlers return appropriate HTTP status codes (4xx for client errors, 5xx for server errors).
Common patterns to flag:
// BAD — swallowed exception
try {
await saveUser(data);
} catch (e) {} // silent failure, caller never knows
// BAD — leaks internals to client
app.use((err, req, res, next) => {
res.status(500).json({ error: err.stack }); // exposes stack trace
});
// GOOD — log internally, generic message to client
app.use((err, req, res, next) => {
logger.error(err);
res.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' });
});
Flag each violation with: file path, a verbatim evidence snippet, category (bare-catch | missing-status-check | raw-error-exposure), and description. Same rule as Step 1 — the snippet is what you produce; the line number comes from Step 6's Anchor Pass.
Step 3 — Regression Check
Use rune:scout to identify all files that import or depend on the changed files/functions.
For each dependent file:
- Check if the changed function signature is still compatible (parameter count, types, return type).
- Check if the dependent file has tests that cover the interaction with the changed code.
- Flag untested impact zones: dependents with zero test coverage of the affected code path.
Flag each regression risk with: dependent file path, what changed, whether tests exist, severity (breaking | degraded | untested).
Step 4 — Completeness Check
Verify that new code ships complete:
- New API endpoint → has input validation schema (Zod, Pydantic, Joi, etc.)
- New React/Svelte component → has loading state AND error state
- New feature → has at least one test file
- New configuration option → has documentation (inline comment or docs file)
- New database query → has corresponding migration file if schema changed
- Cross-layer pairing: new interactive component (button/form/action) → its handler chain reaches a REAL endpoint/service that exists in the codebase — OR the plan explicitly scopes it UI-only with a mock (stated, not assumed). Unexcused missing pair = BLOCK, not WARN: a dead interactive element is incomplete work presented as complete. (Mirror check: new endpoint this diff → ≥1 consumer or a NAMED future task consuming it)
Framework-specific completeness (apply only if detected):
- React component with async data → must have
loadingstate ANDerrorstate - Next.js Server Action → must have
try/catchand return typed result - FastAPI endpoint → must have Pydantic request/response models
- Django ViewSet → must have explicit
permission_classes - Express route → must have input validation middleware before handler
If any completeness item is missing, flag as WARN with: what is missing, which file needs it.
Step 4.2 — Coherence Check
Verify that new code is consistent with existing project patterns — not just correct, but coherent with the codebase it lives in.
| Check | What To Look For | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Naming conventions | New functions/variables follow project's existing naming style (camelCase, snake_case, etc.) | WARN |
| File organization | New files placed in correct directory per project structure (e.g., utils/ not lib/, components/ not ui/) | WARN |
| Import patterns | Uses project's established import style (absolute vs relative, barrel exports vs direct) | WARN |
| Error handling style | Matches project's existing pattern (Result type, try/catch, error codes) | WARN |
| State management | Uses same state approach as rest of project (Zustand, context, stores) | BLOCK if different paradigm |
| API patterns | Follows existing response format, middleware chain, auth pattern | BLOCK if diverges |
| Design system usage | Uses existing design tokens/components, not inline overrides | WARN |
Detection: Read 2-3 existing files in the same directory as the change. Compare patterns. Flag divergences.
Skip if: Project has no established patterns (greenfield, <5 files), or CLAUDE.md/conventions.md explicitly says "no conventions yet."
Step 4.3 — Eval Verification
If .rune/evals/ directory exists with eval definition files, verify eval results as part of the quality gate.
| Check | Action | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Capability eval defined but not run | Feature has .rune/evals/<feature>.md with CAP-* entries but no results | WARN: "Capability evals defined but not executed" |
| Regression eval failing | Any REG-* eval with status=fail | BLOCK: "Regression detected — existing behavior broken" |
| Capability eval below threshold | CAP-* eval pass@k below defined threshold | WARN: "Capability eval below threshold (X% vs Y% required)" |
| No eval file for new feature | New feature added (detected by new test files + new source files) but no .rune/evals/ entry | INFO: "Consider defining capability evals for new feature" |
Skip if: No .rune/evals/ directory exists (project hasn't adopted eval-driven development).
Step 4.5 — Domain Quality Hooks
Apply domain-specific quality checks based on detected file types in the diff. These extend the generic completeness checks in Step 4 with deeper domain validation.
Hook Selection (auto-detect from diff)
| Detected Pattern | Domain Hook | Key Checks |
|---|---|---|
migrations/*.sql, *.migration.* | Database | Rollback script present, no bare DROP/DELETE, migration tested |
openapi.*, *.graphql, *.proto | API Contract | Breaking changes flagged, version bumped, deprecated fields documented |
docs/policies/*, PRIVACY*, TERMS* | Legal/Compliance | No placeholder text, review date current, practice matches policy |
**/billing*, **/payment*, **/invoice* | Financial | Decimal precision correct, currency locale-aware, no hardcoded rates |
*.tsx, *.jsx, *.svelte, *.vue, *.html (with script/template content), components/* | UI/Frontend | Design token compliance, animation a11y, touch targets, visual hierarchy |
skills/*/SKILL.md, extensions/*/PACK.md | Rune Skill | Frontmatter valid, all required sections present, word count within layer budget |
*.test.*, *.spec.*, __tests__/* | Test Quality | No .skip/.only left in, assertions present (not empty tests), no hardcoded timeouts |
Domain Hook Execution
For each detected domain, run its checks on the relevant files in the diff:
- Identify which domain hooks apply based on changed file patterns
- Load domain-specific check rules (inline above, or from pack reference files if a pack is installed)
- Scan each relevant file for domain violations
- Classify findings: BLOCK (data loss risk, breaking contract) or WARN (best practice, incomplete)
- Append to preflight report under
### Domain Qualitysection
UI/Frontend Domain Checks
When UI/Frontend hook is triggered, run these checks on all .tsx/.jsx/.svelte/.vue/.html files in the diff (plain .html counts when it carries interactive markup or inline scripts — a vanilla-JS page is still a UI).
Preamble — load design contract: If .rune/design-system.md exists, read it once. Apply the project's Scale Minimums block over the defaults below (e.g., a project declaring body ≥18px should flag 16px body text). If the file is absent, use defaults and emit a LOW advisory: "No .rune/design-system.md — run rune design to lock visual decisions."
| Check | What to Scan | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Design token compliance | Hardcoded colors (#fff, rgb(, hsl() instead of CSS variables or Tailwind tokens | WARN: "Hardcoded color at {file}:{line} — use design token" |
| UI-SPEC drift | If .rune/ui-spec.md exists, compare component decisions (card style, form layout, nav type) against spec | BLOCK: "Component at {file} uses bordered cards but UI-SPEC locks elevated cards" |
| Animation accessibility | Animations/transitions without prefers-reduced-motion guard | WARN: "Animation at {file}:{line} missing reduced-motion check" |
| Reduced-motion branch is dead | A file that does mention prefers-reduced-motion / prefersReducedMotion / useReducedMotion, where an outer if (reduced) return (or if (!shouldAnimate) return) precedes the call that applies the end state — the guard exists and never runs. A grep hit is not a pass: touches ≠ reachable ≠ correct | WARN: "Reduced-motion branch at {file}:{line} is unreachable — reduced users get the default DOM" |
| Stale motion preference | matchMedia("(prefers-reduced-motion...") read once with no addEventListener("change") nearby, and no library equivalent (useReducedMotion, MotionConfig, gsap.matchMedia) | WARN: "One-shot motion preference at {file}:{line} — goes stale when toggled mid-session" |
| Zero-duration vs completion listener | duration: 0 / 0s on a reduced path in a file that also awaits transitionend, animationend, or onComplete | WARN: "Zero-length transition at {file}:{line} may drop its completion event — use ~0.01ms" |
| JS motion ungated | GSAP / Motion / Framer / Lenis / canvas rAF timeline in the diff, with reduced-motion handling present only in CSS | WARN: "JS timeline at {file}:{line} unaffected by the CSS reduced-motion query" |
| SVGO strips animation | An SVGO config (svgo.config.*, vite-plugin-svgr, svgo block in build config) in the diff or repo root while the project ships animated SVG, without cleanupIds / mergePaths / removeHiddenElems / removeViewBox / inlineStyles disabled | WARN: "SVGO at {file} will strip animated-SVG structure — source correct, build output broken" |
| Touch target size | Interactive elements with explicit small sizing (w-5 h-5, p-0.5 on buttons/links) < 44×44px (or project override from design-system.md) | WARN: "Touch target too small at {file}:{line}" |
| Scale Minimum — body text | text-sm / text-xs / explicit font-size: 14px on <p> or primary body regions (not meta/secondary) | WARN: "Body text below 16px at {file}:{line} — reads as AI boilerplate" |
| Scale Minimum — hero display | <h1> with text-3xl or smaller (30px) when the heading is in a hero/landing section | WARN: "Hero heading below 48px at {file}:{line} — insufficient visual hierarchy" |
| Hand-rolled SVG for standard icons | Inline <svg viewBox= in JSX when the surrounding comment/class names indicate standard iconography (dashboard, menu, close, chevron, arrow, search, home, user, settings, bell, trash) | WARN: "Hand-rolled SVG at {file}:{line} — use @phosphor-icons/react or huge-icons, or ship boxed placeholder" |
| Manual hex accent shading | CSS/Tailwind config defining 2+ sibling --accent-hover / --accent-pressed / --accent-active with hex literals (no oklch(from ...) or design-token chain) | WARN: "Manual hex shade at {file}:{line} — derive via oklch(from var(--accent) calc(l - 0.08) c h)" |
| Dead interactive element | <button>/<form>/action element with no bound handler (any framework syntax: onClick=, on:click=, @click, v-on:), onClick={() => {}}, href="#" on an action link (not navigation/scroll anchors), or preventDefault()-only submit — in files of THIS diff (skip elements listed in .rune/ui-spec.md ## Unwired Elements; prop-origin handlers like onClick={props.onSave} count as bound) | BLOCK: "Dead interactive at {file}:{line} — element renders but does nothing" |
| Missing states | Components fetching data without loading/error/empty states | WARN: "Async component at {file} missing [loading |
| Icon accessibility | Decorative icons without aria-hidden="true", functional icons without aria-label | WARN: "Icon at {file}:{line} missing aria attribute" |
| Inline styles | style={{ or style= attribute usage instead of classes/tokens | WARN: "Inline style at {file}:{line} — use CSS class or Tailwind" |
| Font loading | Custom font imports without font-display: swap or Next.js font optimization | WARN: "Font at {file} may cause layout shift — add font-display: swap" |
| Placeholder content | Strings like "Lorem ipsum", "TODO", "placeholder", "test text" in JSX/template | BLOCK: "Placeholder content at {file}:{line} — replace before shipping" |
Skip if: Diff contains only test files, config files, or non-UI code (detected by absence of JSX/template syntax).
Exception for Scale Minimums: Secondary/meta text (<time>, <small>, form hints, table captions) is allowed at 14px. The check only fires on primary body regions — paragraphs inside <main>, <article>, card body, marketing hero/features. Use common sense or an explicit data-scale="meta" attribute to opt out.
Exception for hand-rolled SVG: Project logos, data visualizations (charts/graphs via d3/recharts/visx), and human-designed illustrations are never flagged. The check fires only when class/comment context names a standard icon.
Pack Integration
When a domain pack is installed (e.g., @rune-pro/finance, @rune-pro/legal), preflight checks the pack's Hard-Stop Thresholds table and applies matching rules to staged files. This means:
- Installing
@rune-pro/financeautomatically adds financial quality gates to preflight - Installing
@rune-pro/legalautomatically adds compliance checks to preflight - No manual configuration needed — pack presence = hooks active
Output Section
### Domain Quality
- **Domains detected**: [Database, Financial]
- `migrations/003-add-billing.sql` — BLOCK: DROP TABLE without rollback script
- `src/billing/invoice.ts:42` — WARN: price calculation uses `toFixed(2)` instead of `Intl.NumberFormat`
Step 4.6 — Organization Approval Requirements (Business)
If .rune/org/org.md exists, load organization approval workflows and enforce them as additional quality gates.
Read.rune/org/org.mdand extract## Policies,## Approval Flows, and## Governance Level- Apply organization-level quality requirements:
| Org Policy | Preflight Check | Severity |
|---|---|---|
minimum_reviewers | Verify PR has required reviewer count before merge | WARN: "Org requires {N} reviewers" |
self-merge_allowed | If "Never" or "No", flag self-merge attempts | BLOCK if org prohibits |
required_checks | Verify all org-required checks (tests, security scan, type check, lint) are passing | BLOCK if missing |
staging_required | If "Yes", verify staging deployment exists before production | WARN if no staging step |
feature_flags | If "Required for user-facing changes", flag new UI without feature flag | WARN |
cross-domain_changes | If changes span multiple team domains, require reviewer from each | WARN |
-
Load
## Approval Flows > ### Feature Launchand display the required approval chain:- Output: "Org approval chain: {flow}" so developer knows the full pipeline
- If governance level is "Maximum", flag any attempt to skip gates
-
Append org findings under
### Organization Requirementssection:
### Organization Requirements
- **Org template**: [startup|mid-size|enterprise]
- **Governance level**: [Minimal|Moderate|Maximum]
- **Minimum reviewers**: 2 (1 must be director+)
- **Required checks**: tests (≥80% coverage), security scan, type check, lint
- **Approval chain**: contributor proposes → lead reviews → vp approves → deploy
- WARN: Self-merge not allowed per org policy
If .rune/org/org.md does not exist, skip and log INFO: "no org config, organization requirements check skipped".
Step 4.8 — Preflight Composite Score
After all domain hooks (Step 4.5) and completeness checks (Step 4) complete, compute a Preflight Health Score to make the verdict numeric and comparable across runs.
Formula
Preflight Score = (Logic × 0.30) + (Error Handling × 0.20) + (Completeness × 0.20) + (Coherence × 0.15) + (Regression Risk × 0.15)
5 verification axes (Completeness + Correctness via Logic + Coherence — 3D verification model):
Each dimension is scored per staged files:
- 0 BLOCK findings in dimension → 100
- 1 BLOCK → dimension capped at 30
- 1 WARN → dimension capped at 75
- Each additional WARN → subtract 10 (floor: 40)
Grade Thresholds
| Score | Grade | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| 90–100 | Excellent | PASS |
| 75–89 | Good | PASS with notes |
| 60–74 | Fair | WARN |
| 40–59 | Poor | WARN (escalate to developer) |
| 0–39 | Critical | BLOCK |
Score is appended to the Preflight Report footer. Useful for tracking quality trend across sprints when cook logs preflight scores to .rune/metrics/.
Step 5 — Security Sub-Check
Invoke rune:sentinel on the changed files. Attach sentinel's output verbatim under the "Security" section of the preflight report. If sentinel returns BLOCK, preflight verdict is also BLOCK.
Step 6 — Generate Verdict
Falsification Pass first. Before aggregating, filter findings by disproof, not by confidence — the same rule review applies (../review/SKILL.md → Step 6):
- DROP a finding only when the code you read contains direct counter-evidence against its key claim (the null check exists, the
awaitis present, the caller validates the input). - KEEP a finding that depends on context outside the diff which you did read via tools — that context is evidence.
- KEEP a finding you can neither verify nor disprove. "Unsure" is not grounds to drop; only counter-evidence is.
- Dropped findings are discarded silently, never listed as considered-and-dismissed.
Type each surviving finding OBSERVED | DERIVED | ASSUMED per ../completion-gate/references/claim-discipline.md. An ASSUMED finding — one resting on a premise you could not check — names that premise and never escalates the verdict to BLOCK on its own. It reports as WARN with the premise stated.
Anchor Pass second. Every finding you collected in Steps 1-4 carries an evidence snippet, not a line number. Resolve each one now via the Anchor Ladder defined in ../review/SKILL.md → Step 6: Grep the exact snippet, retry once whitespace-normalised with the outer lines dropped, and on a second miss mark the finding UNANCHORED.
UNANCHORED behaves here exactly as it does in review — downgrade one level (BLOCK → WARN → INFO), report as path (unanchored) with the snippet inline, never drop. A finding that will not anchor cannot carry the BLOCK verdict on its own, for the same reason an ASSUMED one cannot: halting a pipeline on a claim nobody can locate spends the developer's trust faster than the bug would have.
Then aggregate all surviving findings:
- Any BLOCK from sentinel OR a logic issue that would cause data corruption or security bypass OR a dead interactive element (Step 4 cross-layer pairing / Step 4.5 dead-interactive check) OR a BLOCK from any domain hook → overall BLOCK
- Any missing error handling, regression risk with no tests, or incomplete feature (other than the BLOCK cases above) → WARN
- Only style or best-practice suggestions → PASS
Shortened here. Read the whole file on GitHub.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 86
- Forks
- 26
- Last commit
- Aug 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
preflight-rune-kit- Source
- github.com/rune-kit/rune