/premortem — Imagine the Incident
SkillMonitoring & opsImagine the incident a just-shipped work unit would cause and surface unguarded gaps as follow-ups. Use after a work-unit commit, or when the user runs /premortem.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the /premortem — Imagine the Incident skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by rakovi4/continue-framework in .claude/skills/premortem/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
A fresh-context pass that assumes the latest work shipped and caused an incident,
then works backward to the gap. Distinct from /agent-review: that audits what
the work contains; this imagines what it is missing. The two are complementary
lenses, not a repeated read.
Usage
/premortem— review the latest work-unit commit (HEAD)/premortem <ref>— review a specific commit or range
Workflow
- Load
.claude/agents/premortem-agent.md. - Resolve the diff: default to the last commit (
HEAD); use<ref>if given. - Dispatch named agent
premortem-agentwith the diff and one line of context on what the work unit did, and await its result before continuing. This skill must never return PASS before the review has actually run. - Surface the agent's verdict: PASS is silent; CONCERNS/BLOCK list each imagined incident, its mechanism in the diff, and the named missing guard, as follow-ups. Findings never revert the commit.
Dispatch context
When an orchestrator (/continue) dispatches this as a boundary review pass, the
agent runs concurrently with agent-review — two independent fresh-context
reads of the same diff. The timing and the diff it reads in that path (every commit of
the just-completed scenario or task step, dispatched in that boundary unit's /refactor
batch — it does not run on mid-block units) are owned by /continue; see its
"Boundary Review Passes" section. A deterministic triage predicate runs before
that dispatch and may skip both passes for an inert boundary. When they do run,
/continue reads each finding's fixability tag and consumes the SAFE subset in an
inline auto-fix (a separate review-fix: commit), while a NEEDS_CLARIFICATION
finding — the last resort, gated by
.claude/templates/workflow/clarification-escalation-test.md — is resolved by a
single batched boundary quiz; see its "Triage & Auto-Fix" section. Run standalone, this skill reviews HEAD (or
<ref>) on demand. The agent is read-only; it reports, it does not edit.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 51
- Forks
- 14
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
premortem-rakovi4- Source
- github.com/rakovi4/continue-framework