product-feedback-roadmap Stinger
SkillDev toolsCustomer-feedback-to-roadmap loop specialist — Userback, Canny, Featurebase, Productboard, Frill, Productlane — platform selection decision tree, in-app-widget vs portal vs voting-board taxonomy, de-duplication discipline, RICE/ICE prioritization, status-transition policy, public vs private roadmap playbook, and CRM/issue-tracker integration wiring. Use when the user says "set up a feedback system", "which feedback tool should I use", "Canny vs Featurebase", "our feature requests are a mess", "set up a public roadmap", "RICE scoring for our backlog", "Productlane + Linear", "voting board for our SaaS", or when product-feedback-roadmap-worker-bee is invoked. Do NOT use for the React UI of an embedded widget (react-worker-bee), the database schema for a custom-built feedback store (db-worker-bee), marketing copy on the public roadmap page (seo-aeo-worker-bee), or billing integration for premium feedback tiers (payments-worker-bee).
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the product-feedback-roadmap Stinger skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by legioncodeinc/vibe-coding-tools in src/skills/product-feedback-roadmap-stinger/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
You are the playbook for product-feedback-roadmap-worker-bee. Every invocation should produce one concrete artifact: a platform recommendation, a de-duplication policy, a scored RICE/ICE backlog table, a status-transition policy doc, or a public roadmap posture decision. The research in research/ backs every recommendation.
2026 landscape notes:
- Featurebase is pivoting toward live chat / support. Feedback features may receive less investment. Flag this risk to users choosing Featurebase as their primary feedback tool.
- Canny killed its free tier in 2023. Current plans: Free (limited), Core $19/mo, Pro $79/mo, Business (custom). "Starter" and "Growth" are legacy names.
- Productlane is the clear choice for teams on Linear who want CRM-integrated feedback.
- Frill is per-workspace (not per-seat), making it cost-effective for small teams needing basics.
When this stinger applies
Load for any of:
- Choosing a feedback collection platform (Userback, Canny, Featurebase, Productboard, Frill, Productlane).
- Designing or auditing a feedback collection surface (in-app widget, customer portal, public voting board).
- Establishing a de-duplication discipline for a bloated feature-request backlog.
- Authoring or reviewing a status-transition policy (
under review → planned → in progress → shipped → not planned). - Scoring and prioritizing feature requests with RICE or ICE frameworks.
- Deciding between a public and private roadmap, or designing a hybrid transparency posture.
- Wiring integrations between a feedback tool and a CRM or issue tracker (Productlane + Linear, Canny + Jira, Featurebase + Linear).
Do NOT load for:
- React/Next.js code for an embedded feedback widget — that is
react-worker-bee. - Database schema for a custom-built feedback store — that is
db-worker-bee. - SEO metadata on the public roadmap page — that is
seo-aeo-worker-bee. - Billing integration for premium feedback tiers — that is
payments-worker-bee. - Support conversation surface (Intercom, Plain, Help Scout) — that is
live-chat-support-worker-bee. Note: Featurebase is blurring this boundary in 2026; if a user wants Featurebase for both feedback AND live chat, involve both worker-bees.
First action when this stinger is loaded
- Read
guides/00-platform-selection.md— the decision tree and pricing table. - Triage the user's request against the six workflow intents below.
- Open the relevant guide(s) before producing any output.
Folder layout
product-feedback-roadmap-stinger/
+- SKILL.md (this file)
+- guides/
| +- 00-platform-selection.md (decision matrix: Userback vs Canny vs Featurebase vs Productboard vs Frill vs Productlane)
| +- 01-collection-surface-taxonomy.md (in-app widget vs portal vs voting board; channel stacks by goal)
| +- 02-deduplication-discipline.md (canonical merge workflow, semantic tagging, anti-patterns)
| +- 03-status-transition-policy.md (5-status model, entry/exit conditions, notification templates)
| +- 04-prioritization-frameworks.md (RICE vs ICE vs MoSCoW; scoring rubric; evolution path)
| +- 05-public-roadmap-playbook.md (transparency spectrum; 20% cap rule; no-dates discipline)
| +- 06-integration-wiring.md (Productlane+Linear, Canny+Jira, Featurebase+Linear, Userback+Slack)
+- examples/
| +- rice-scoring-worked.md (5 real-world requests scored end-to-end)
+- templates/
| +- rice-scoring-sheet.md (blank scoring sheet; Reach/Impact/Confidence/Effort rubric)
| +- status-transition-policy.md (policy doc template teams drop into Notion/Confluence)
| +- dedup-triage-template.md (weekly dedup session facilitation template)
+- reports/
| +- README.md (how audit reports accumulate)
+- research/
+- research-plan.md
+- research-summary.md
+- index.md
+- external/ (12 curated sources)
Critical directives (from Command Brief)
These apply on every invocation. Full justifications in the Command Brief at ai-tools/command-briefs/product-feedback-roadmap-worker-bee-command-brief.md.
- De-duplicate before scoring. Scoring 14 variants of "export to CSV" as separate items wastes prioritization budget and inflates apparent demand. The canonical merge step must precede any RICE/ICE run.
- Every status transition must trigger a customer notification. The loop is only "closed" when the customer hears back. A status that changes silently does not build trust and does not reduce support volume.
- Never commit public dates on a roadmap. Date commitments on a public roadmap become support tickets the moment a sprint slips. Use quarters, status-only, or "now/next/later" language.
- Scope the platform recommendation to one primary tool per surface. Running Canny for voting AND Userback for in-app widgets AND Productboard for internal scoring produces three drifting sources of truth. The recommendation must pick a primary and demote the others to integrations or deprecate them.
- Always surface "not planned" as a first-class status option. Refusing to say "no" publicly causes backlogs to grow without bound and erodes trust. Honest declination with a rationale is more valuable than indefinite limbo.
- Flag the Featurebase strategic pivot risk. Featurebase is shifting focus toward live chat/support in 2026. For teams choosing it as a primary feedback tool, this warrants a dedicated caveat.
Triage decision tree
User request → Triage intent
"which feedback tool?" / "Canny vs X" / "compare feedback platforms"
→ guides/00-platform-selection.md
"in-app widget" / "feedback board" / "portal" / "which collection surface?"
→ guides/01-collection-surface-taxonomy.md
"duplicate requests" / "same feature requested 10 times" / "de-duplicate"
→ guides/02-deduplication-discipline.md
"feature request status" / "status transitions" / "notify customers when shipped"
→ guides/03-status-transition-policy.md
"prioritize requests" / "RICE score" / "ICE score" / "what to build next"
→ guides/04-prioritization-frameworks.md
"public roadmap" / "should we publish our roadmap" / "roadmap transparency"
→ guides/05-public-roadmap-playbook.md
"Productlane + Linear" / "Canny + Jira" / "integrate feedback with issue tracker"
→ guides/06-integration-wiring.md
Full setup / audit → 00 → 01 → 02 → 03 → 04 → 05 → 06 in sequence
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 83
- Forks
- 37
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
product-feedback-roadmap-stinger- Source
- github.com/legioncodeinc/vibe-coding-tools