Product Lifecycle

SkillAI & models

Route a product through its full lifecycle — discovery, strategy, portfolio choice, roadmap, UX and requirements, experimentation, delivery handoff, adoption, success, and lifecycle review — by composing existing specialist product skills with phase-entry evidence, handoff artifacts, and escalation rules. Use when evaluating a new product idea, managing a product through its lifecycle, or connecting product phases that currently operate in isolation. Do not use for a single product task that is already owned by a specialist skill (load that skill directly); do not use for software delivery lifecycle work (route to neckbeard); do not use to duplicate product discovery, strategy, UX, experimentation, analytics, release, or delivery methods.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Product Lifecycle skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by magnus919/agent-skills in product-lifecycle/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

A thin orchestration bundle that routes a product through nine lifecycle phases by composing existing specialist product skills. It provides cross-skill routing and evidence handoff — it does NOT duplicate any specialist's step-by-step methodology. Load this umbrella when you need to navigate a product across multiple lifecycle phases; load individual specialist skills directly when you only need one phase's capability.

Phase routing table

Each phase routes to one or more specialist skills. Entry evidence must exist before the phase starts. Output artifacts are handed off to the next phase through the lifecycle evidence ledger. Every phase has explicit escalation behavior and completion criteria. Full phase contracts are in references/phases.md.

#PhasePrimary specialist(s)Entry evidenceOutput artifactsEscalation behaviorCompletion criteria
1Discoveryproduct-discoveryProduct idea, market signal, or stakeholder requestProblem statement, stakeholder map, discovery log, product type classificationStop if: problem cannot be articulated in user terms; no stakeholder describes a real need; problem is already solved; out of organizational remitProblem statement exists that a stakeholder recognizes; product type classified; proceed/pause/stop decision recorded
2Strategy and portfolio choiceproduct-strategy, strategy-frameworksProblem statement and discovery log from Phase 1Strategic assessment, market sizing, portfolio recommendation, investment thesisStop if: opportunity conflicts with strategy; market evidence contradicts thesis; resource constraints are infeasible; strategic direction is ambiguousStrategic assessment with fit/no-fit reasoning; portfolio decision recorded; resource estimate recorded
3Roadmapproduct-roadmapping-and-portfolioStrategic assessment and portfolio decision from Phase 2Outcome roadmap entry, Now/Next/Later placement, strategic bet record, dependency map, capacity allocationStop if: dependencies cannot be resolved; capacity unavailable; confidence below threshold; conflicts with higher-priority betRoadmap entry exists; bet record complete with kill criteria; dependencies mapped and acknowledged
4UX and requirementsproduct-design-and-uxRoadmap entry and bet record from Phase 3; discovery logInformation architecture, task flows, interface contracts, acceptance criteriaStop if: UX reveals fundamentally different problem; user research contradicts hypothesis; behavior cannot be specified testably; constraints cannot be satisfiedIA and task flows documented; interface contracts exist; acceptance criteria are testable and traceable
5Experimentationproduct-experimentationUX contracts, assumptions register, risk assessmentExperiment brief, experiment readout, updated assumptions register, proceed/pivot/stop decisionStop if: experiment cannot be designed ethically; method infeasible; reveals safety/privacy/security risk; hypothesis disproved with no viable pivotExperiment brief exists with hypothesis and decision rule; readout exists; proceed/pivot/stop decision recorded with evidence
6Delivery handoffimplementation-planning, production-readiness, release-engineeringProceed decision, UX contracts, acceptance criteria, assumptions registerImplementation plan, formal spec, production-readiness verdict (Go/No-go/Defer/Exception), release planStop if: infeasible dependency; readiness returns No-go or blocked Exception; security/privacy/compliance blocks launch; release plan cannot satisfy change-governanceImplementation plan accepted by delivery team; readiness verdict recorded with evidence; release plan documented and reviewed
7Adoptionproduct-adoptionLaunch decision (Go), release evidence, target segments, success metricsAdoption plan, activation baseline, segmentation record, adoption metricsStop if: adoption materially below threshold after intervention; fundamental product-market mismatch; structural adoption problem beyond product changesAdoption plan executed; activation and adoption baselines measured; proceed/intervene/pivot/stop decision recorded
8Successproduct-analytics-and-measurementAdoption evidence, success criteria, experiment readoutsOutcome measurement, metric tree with actuals vs. targets, success/mixed/not-met assessmentStop if: outcomes materially below expectations with unknown root cause; measurement infrastructure insufficient; evidence contradicts investment thesisOutcome metrics measured against criteria; success assessment recorded; ledger complete for review
9Lifecycle reviewproduct-lifecycle-learningOutcome measurement, full evidence ledger, original assumptions registerOutcome review (expected vs. observed), assumption ledger update, continue/improve/harvest/pivot/pause/retire decision, retained learning recordStop if: retirement has material implications beyond team authority; retained learning contradicts foundational assumption; systemic pattern requires executive attentionOutcome review recorded; lifecycle decision recorded with rationale; retained learning captured; ledger closed

Supporting and cross-cutting skills

These skills are loaded on trigger, not by phase. They support multiple phases and are routed to when their specific capability is needed.

SkillWhen loaded
product-methodologyWhen a phase produces alternatives that need ranking (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, OST)
product-operations-and-governanceWhen setting up or changing governance; at phase boundaries needing formal decision authority
financial-modelingWhen unit economics, pricing, or business-model analysis is needed (Phases 2, 8)
go-to-marketWhen positioning, acquisition strategy, or growth modeling is needed (Phases 7, 8)
data-scientistWhen statistical design, causal inference, or rigorous experiment analysis is needed (Phases 5, 8)
spec-driven-developmentWhen formal specification with phase gates is needed (Phase 6)
privacy-engineeringWhen any phase handles PII, consent, retention, or data flows
secure-software-engineeringWhen any phase touches trust boundaries, auth, or sensitive data
verification-methodologyAt every phase gate where evidence is required
qa-methodologyWhen test strategy and quality gates are needed (Phase 6)
site-reliability-engineeringWhen reliability, SLOs, or operational readiness is needed (Phase 6)
platform-engineeringWhen infrastructure, CI/CD, or platform capabilities are needed (Phase 6)
neckbeardWhen the software delivery lifecycle (SDLC) change-request journey is needed for implementation (Phase 6)
production-excellence bundle (when available)When the full production-excellence bundle is available as a handoff target (Phase 6) — composes production-readiness, migration-engineering, resilience-and-recovery, capacity-and-cost-engineering, and incident-learning

Loading protocol

This umbrella is the guaranteed discoverable entry point. Nested skills and referenced specialists load on trigger — the umbrella does not pre-load them.

  1. Read this SKILL.md for the phase routing table and locate the current phase.
  2. Load the phase contract from references/phases.md for detailed entry evidence, escalation behavior, and completion criteria.
  3. Load the specialist skill(s) named in the phase row. Follow the specialist's method; do not re-derive it from the umbrella.
  4. Write phase outputs to the lifecycle evidence ledger (see references/phases.md for ledger fields and conventions).
  5. The next phase reads the ledger; it does not re-derive prior-phase evidence.
  6. When the lifecycle completes or stops, the ledger is the durable record.

For capability lookup without traversing the full lifecycle, use the references/capability-map.md.

When not to use

  • Single specialist task. If the work is entirely within one phase (e.g., a stakeholder interview, an experiment design, a roadmap update), load the specialist skill directly. The umbrella adds orchestration overhead that is unnecessary for single-phase work.
  • Software delivery lifecycle. If the work is a code change, bug fix, or feature implementation — not product-level decision-making — route to neckbeard.
  • Duplicate methodology. This bundle does NOT duplicate product-discovery, product-strategy, product-design-and-ux, product-experimentation, product-analytics-and-measurement, or release-engineering methods. Load those skills directly for their step-by-step instructions.
  • B2B SaaS assumption. This bundle does NOT assume a B2B SaaS product. Customer-success routing (Phase 8) is CONDITIONAL on product type. Internal tools, public-service products, transactional products, and consumer products proceed without loading conditional-customer-success.
  • Strategic frameworks. For standalone strategic analysis (Five Forces, Blue Ocean, Ansoff) without a lifecycle context, load strategy-frameworks directly.
  • Financial modeling. For standalone financial analysis without a lifecycle context, load financial-modeling directly.

File map

PathLoaded when
references/phases.mdEntering any lifecycle phase; defines entry evidence, output artifacts, escalation behavior, and completion criteria per phase
references/discovery-brief.mdUnderstanding the bundle boundary and how it compares to existing bundles
references/capability-map.mdLooking up which specialist skill owns a specific capability without traversing the full lifecycle
manifest.yamlMachine-readable composition contract (schema v1): purpose, audience, stages, included skills, prerequisites, outputs, handoffs, conflicts, and eval suite; consumed by the lifecycle capability matrix

Signals

GitHub stars
78
Forks
8
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
product-lifecycle
Source
github.com/magnus919/agent-skills