QA Review

Screenshot-backed review. Checklist gate. Explicit ship / no-ship.

When to Use

• Before export or handoff
• After major modeling/lookdev milestones
• Reference-match final compare
• Periodic scene health checks

Workflow

Gather brief budgets → Screenshot key angles → Run checklists
  → List defects (severity) → Fix or reject → Re-verify → Verdict

Required Screenshots

1. 3/4 hero angle
2. Ortho or profile if proportion-critical
3. Wireframe or poly overview (optional but useful)
4. Material/light beauty
5. Vs reference (if reference task)

Use get_viewport_screenshot via MCP when connected.

Checklists (load as needed)

• ../references/validation-checklist.md
• ../references/visual-match-checklist.md (reference tasks)
• ../references/naming-conventions.md
• ../references/polycount-budgets.md

Defect Severity

Level	Meaning
Blocker	Wrong scale, broken normals, fails budget badly
Major	Silhouette/readability issues, bad pivots
Minor	Naming, minor shading, small gaps
Note	Optional polish

Verdict Template

## QA Verdict: [Asset]

**Result:** SHIP / SHIP WITH NOTES / NO-SHIP
**Budgets:** [tris/textures] vs target
**Screenshots:** [listed]
**Blockers:** ...
**Majors:** ...
**Minors:** ...
**Next actions:** ...

Constraints

MUST DO

• Give explicit verdict
• Attach or capture screenshots for visual claims
• Re-check after fixes before flipping to SHIP

MUST NOT DO

• Rubber-stamp without screenshots on visual tasks
• Ignore budget overruns without approval

Reference Guide

Topic	Reference	Load When
Qa Verdict Template	references/qa-verdict-template.md	When needed
Screenshot Angles	references/screenshot-angles.md	When needed